← All teams

Western Conference · 2026-27

Sacramento Kings SAC

1–9
2026-27 record
1336
Elo rating
with the forecast of Nov 8
107.8
Offensive rating
last 10 games
120.9
Defensive rating
last 10, lower is better
101.7
Pace
possessions per game
206 of 345 forecasts for SAC games picked the winner.

Hover the ball to see a season.

Every graded SAC game, one dot each, oldest at the center. 206 of 345 forecasts picked the winner (colored dots).

Elo rating, recent games

SAC pregame Elo over its last 82 games with a forecast, from 1478 to 1336 1250130013501400145015001550 new season 1336 Nov 2025 Nov 2026
Pregame Elo stored with each of SAC's last 82 forecasts. Dashed: 1500, the long-run average.

Upcoming

Schedule
Nov 10 10:00 PM ET
ORL Orlando Magic 2–7 –
@SAC Sacramento Kings (home) 1–9 –
Forecast coming Details
Nov 13 10:00 PM ET
POR Portland Trail Blazers 6–3 –
@SAC Sacramento Kings (home) 1–9 –
Forecast coming Details

Recent results

Archive
Nov 8 Final
MIA Miami Heat 123 114
@SAC Sacramento Kings (home) 118 108
MIA 65% 35% SAC

Why: Elo 5.5 → MIA · Season margin 0.8 → MIA

✓ Picked MIA Details
Nov 6 Final
SAS San Antonio Spurs 121 124
@SAC Sacramento Kings (home) 111 109
SAS 77% 23% SAC
✓ Picked SAS Details
Nov 4 Final
LAL Los Angeles Lakers 124 116
@SAC Sacramento Kings (home) 112 103
LAL 77% 23% SAC
✓ Picked LAL Details
Nov 2 Final
SAC Sacramento Kings 114 115
@DAL Dallas Mavericks (home) 123 100
SAC 26% 74% DAL

Why: Elo 3.9 → DAL · Offense, last 10 1.4 → DAL

Upset✗ Picked DAL Details
Oct 31 Final
SAC Sacramento Kings 119 105
@MEM Memphis Grizzlies (home) 122 136
SAC 41% 59% MEM

Why: Elo 1.8 → MEM · Pace 1.1 → SAC

✓ Picked MEM Details

Predictability

How closely the forecasts tracked SAC games. A team can be hard for this model to forecast whether it is good or bad: misses come from the model's limits, roster changes, missing information and ordinary game-to-game variation. Compare all 30 teams

2026-27 (in progress)

Small sample: 10 games. These figures are a running log, not a measurement, and no ranking is shown.

11.5 pts
average margin miss
90% interval 6.9 to 16.2
−6.7
average margin error
+ = better than forecast; 90% interval -13.1 to 0.1
13.7 pts
error variability
std. deviation; league margin miss 11.7
80%
winner picked
10 games involving SAC
1 / 3.3
actual / expected wins
gap −2.3
0.170
Brier score
0.25 = coin flip; lower is better

Expected and actual wins

SAC: cumulative expected wins from pregame win probabilities against actual wins 024 1 actual 3.3 exp. 1510 Game number in sample
Solid: actual wins. Dashed: expected wins, the running sum of SAC's pregame win probability in each game.

Margin error, game by game

SAC: margin forecast error in each game, actual minus predicted -30-150+15+30 Better than forecast Worse than forecast Games in date order
Each bar is one game: SAC's actual margin minus its predicted margin, in points. Positive bars sit above the line and negative bars below it, so direction does not depend on color.

How the errors are spread

SAC: distribution of 10 margin errors; mean -6.7 points 023 -40 to -36 pts: 0 games -36 to -32 pts: 0 games -32 to -28 pts: 0 games -28 to -24 pts: 1 games -24 to -20 pts: 0 games -20 to -16 pts: 1 games -16 to -12 pts: 1 games -12 to -8 pts: 2 games -8 to -4 pts: 1 games -4 to 0 pts: 3 games 0 to 4 pts: 0 games 4 to 8 pts: 0 games 8 to 12 pts: 0 games 12 to 16 pts: 0 games 16 to 20 pts: 0 games 20 to 24 pts: 0 games 24 to 28 pts: 1 games 28 to 32 pts: 0 games 32 to 36 pts: 0 games 36 to 40 pts: 0 games mean -6.7 -40-200+20+40 worse than forecast better than forecast
Each bar counts games whose margin error fell in a 4-point range (errors beyond ±40 are in the end bars). Dashed line: the average error.

SAC against the league

Average margin miss by team, 2026-27, smallest to largest; SAC is 12 of 30 3579111315171921232527 median 11.7 UTA: 6.70 points over 10 games, 90% interval 4.4–9.2 UTA 6.7 n=10 NOP: 7.70 points over 10 games, 90% interval 4.3–11.7 NOP 7.7 n=10 CLE: 8.50 points over 10 games, 90% interval 4.8–12.8 CLE 8.5 n=10 SAS: 8.50 points over 10 games, 90% interval 6.6–10.4 SAS 8.5 n=10 PHI: 8.82 points over 11 games, 90% interval 5.73–12.36 PHI 8.8 n=11 MIL: 9.00 points over 10 games, 90% interval 5.1–13.4 MIL 9.0 n=10 LAL: 9.64 points over 11 games, 90% interval 6.27–13 LAL 9.6 n=11 PHX: 9.88 points over 8 games, 90% interval 4.12–18.25 PHX 9.9 n=8 IND: 10.20 points over 10 games, 90% interval 6.8–14 IND 10.2 n=10 LAC: 11.33 points over 9 games, 90% interval 7.33–15.56 LAC 11.3 n=9 NYK: 11.33 points over 9 games, 90% interval 7.89–14.67 NYK 11.3 n=9 SAC: 11.50 points over 10 games, 90% interval 6.9–16.2 SAC 11.5 n=10 WAS: 11.50 points over 10 games, 90% interval 6.7–16.6 WAS 11.5 n=10 DET: 11.56 points over 9 games, 90% interval 8.56–15.56 DET 11.6 n=9 BOS: 11.70 points over 10 games, 90% interval 7.4–16.7 BOS 11.7 n=10 DEN: 11.75 points over 8 games, 90% interval 6.88–16.88 DEN 11.8 n=8 BKN: 11.90 points over 10 games, 90% interval 7.6–16.7 BKN 11.9 n=10 CHI: 12.00 points over 9 games, 90% interval 6.44–18.11 CHI 12.0 n=9 MIA: 12.00 points over 10 games, 90% interval 7.8–16 MIA 12.0 n=10 GSW: 12.50 points over 10 games, 90% interval 8.4–17.4 GSW 12.5 n=10 MIN: 12.55 points over 11 games, 90% interval 7.36–18.18 MIN 12.6 n=11 HOU: 13.10 points over 10 games, 90% interval 8.9–17.9 HOU 13.1 n=10 ATL: 13.55 points over 11 games, 90% interval 6.64–21.55 ATL 13.6 n=11 ORL: 13.67 points over 9 games, 90% interval 9.67–18.22 ORL 13.7 n=9 OKC: 14.20 points over 10 games, 90% interval 8.3–20.5 OKC 14.2 n=10 DAL: 14.70 points over 10 games, 90% interval 9.7–19.8 DAL 14.7 n=10 POR: 15.11 points over 9 games, 90% interval 8.89–22 POR 15.1 n=9 TOR: 15.33 points over 9 games, 90% interval 9.78–21.33 TOR 15.3 n=9 MEM: 15.56 points over 9 games, 90% interval 10.22–20.78 MEM 15.6 n=9 CHA: 17.30 points over 10 games, 90% interval 9.3–26.3 CHA 17.3 n=10 average margin miss, points (lower = easier to forecast)
Dots: average absolute margin error per team. Lines: 90% bootstrap intervals; overlapping lines mean the difference between those teams is not clear in this sample. Hollow dots: fewer than 20 games.
All 10 games in this sample
DateOpponentSAC win prob.ProjectedFinalPickMargin error
Nov 8 vs MIA 35% 118–123 L 108–114 ✓correct −1
Nov 6 vs SAS 23% 111–121 L 109–124 ✓correct −5
Nov 4 vs LAL 23% 112–124 L 103–116 ✓correct −1
Nov 2 at DAL 26% 114–123 W 115–100 ✗missed +24
Oct 31 at MEM 41% 119–122 L 105–136 ✓correct −28
Oct 29 at NOP 44% 120–122 L 120–132 ✓correct −10
Oct 27 at SAS 15% 108–123 L 103–130 ✓correct −12
Oct 25 vs MEM 56% 119–117 L 112–123 ✗missed −13
Oct 23 vs POR 36% 112–117 L 120–128 ✓correct −3
Oct 21 at LAC 31% 111–118 L 96–121 ✓correct −18

2025-26

Across 82 graded games, SAC finished an average of 3.3 points worse than the forecast margin (90% interval -5.8 to -0.8).

11.6 pts
average margin miss
90% interval 10.1 to 13.3; 17th smallest of 30
−3.3
average margin error
+ = better than forecast; 90% interval -5.8 to -0.8
14.4 pts
error variability
std. deviation; league margin miss 11.4
73%
winner picked
82 games involving SAC
22 / 27.4
actual / expected wins
gap −5.4
0.203
Brier score
0.25 = coin flip; lower is better

Expected and actual wins

SAC: cumulative expected wins from pregame win probabilities against actual wins 051015202530 22 actual 27.4 exp. 14182 Game number in sample
Solid: actual wins. Dashed: expected wins, the running sum of SAC's pregame win probability in each game.

Margin error, game by game

SAC: margin forecast error in each game, actual minus predicted -50-250+25+50 Better than forecast Worse than forecast Games in date order
Each bar is one game: SAC's actual margin minus its predicted margin, in points. Positive bars sit above the line and negative bars below it, so direction does not depend on color.

How the errors are spread

SAC: distribution of 82 margin errors; mean -3.3 points 0714 -40 to -36 pts: 1 games -36 to -32 pts: 0 games -32 to -28 pts: 2 games -28 to -24 pts: 5 games -24 to -20 pts: 2 games -20 to -16 pts: 6 games -16 to -12 pts: 4 games -12 to -8 pts: 5 games -8 to -4 pts: 14 games -4 to 0 pts: 7 games 0 to 4 pts: 13 games 4 to 8 pts: 5 games 8 to 12 pts: 7 games 12 to 16 pts: 0 games 16 to 20 pts: 7 games 20 to 24 pts: 1 games 24 to 28 pts: 2 games 28 to 32 pts: 1 games 32 to 36 pts: 0 games 36 to 40 pts: 0 games mean -3.3 -40-200+20+40 worse than forecast better than forecast
Each bar counts games whose margin error fell in a 4-point range (errors beyond ±40 are in the end bars). Dashed line: the average error.

SAC against the league

Average margin miss by team, 2025-26, smallest to largest; SAC is 18 of 30 79111315 median 11.5 NOP: 9.60 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.48–10.84 NOP 9.6 n=82 DAL: 9.67 points over 81 games, 90% interval 8.4–11.09 DAL 9.7 n=81 DET: 10.16 points over 95 games, 90% interval 8.67–11.82 DET 10.2 n=95 IND: 10.32 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.74–12.01 IND 10.3 n=82 SAS: 10.41 points over 103 games, 90% interval 9.12–11.82 SAS 10.4 n=103 GSW: 10.43 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.06–11.98 GSW 10.4 n=82 CLE: 10.56 points over 100 games, 90% interval 9.19–11.94 CLE 10.6 n=100 POR: 10.59 points over 87 games, 90% interval 9.22–12.23 POR 10.6 n=87 DEN: 10.67 points over 88 games, 90% interval 9.09–12.41 DEN 10.7 n=88 MEM: 10.72 points over 80 games, 90% interval 9.05–12.4 MEM 10.7 n=80 ORL: 10.76 points over 86 games, 90% interval 9.19–12.45 ORL 10.8 n=86 PHX: 10.87 points over 86 games, 90% interval 9.27–12.48 PHX 10.9 n=86 HOU: 10.93 points over 88 games, 90% interval 9.52–12.23 HOU 10.9 n=88 LAL: 11.25 points over 92 games, 90% interval 9.9–12.52 LAL 11.3 n=92 OKC: 11.48 points over 96 games, 90% interval 9.74–13.17 OKC 11.5 n=96 LAC: 11.50 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.93–13.07 LAC 11.5 n=82 CHI: 11.59 points over 82 games, 90% interval 10.02–13.22 CHI 11.6 n=82 SAC: 11.59 points over 82 games, 90% interval 10.06–13.29 SAC 11.6 n=82 PHI: 11.63 points over 93 games, 90% interval 10.02–13.37 PHI 11.6 n=93 BOS: 11.89 points over 89 games, 90% interval 10.47–13.35 BOS 11.9 n=89 WAS: 12.07 points over 82 games, 90% interval 10.65–13.57 WAS 12.1 n=82 UTA: 12.18 points over 82 games, 90% interval 10.29–14.11 UTA 12.2 n=82 BKN: 12.48 points over 82 games, 90% interval 10.94–14.34 BKN 12.5 n=82 MIN: 12.49 points over 94 games, 90% interval 11.06–14.07 MIN 12.5 n=94 ATL: 12.58 points over 88 games, 90% interval 10.92–14.49 ATL 12.6 n=88 TOR: 12.62 points over 89 games, 90% interval 11.03–14.24 TOR 12.6 n=89 MIA: 12.63 points over 82 games, 90% interval 11.02–14.3 MIA 12.6 n=82 MIL: 12.80 points over 82 games, 90% interval 11.06–14.59 MIL 12.8 n=82 CHA: 13.29 points over 82 games, 90% interval 11.57–15.17 CHA 13.3 n=82 NYK: 13.45 points over 99 games, 90% interval 11.64–15.37 NYK 13.4 n=99 average margin miss, points (lower = easier to forecast)
Dots: average absolute margin error per team. Lines: 90% bootstrap intervals; overlapping lines mean the difference between those teams is not clear in this sample. Hollow dots: fewer than 20 games.
All 82 games in this sample
DateOpponentSAC win prob.ProjectedFinalPickMargin error
Apr 12 at POR 17% 105–119 L 110–122 ✓correct +2
Apr 10 vs GSW 42% 114–117 W 124–118 ✗missed +9
Apr 7 at GSW 36% 111–116 L 105–110 ✓correct ±0
Apr 5 vs LAC 27% 110–119 L 109–138 ✓correct −20
Apr 3 vs NOP 44% 113–115 W 117–113 ✗missed +6
Apr 1 at TOR 22% 108–119 W 123–115 ✗missed +19
Mar 29 at BKN 56% 113–111 L 99–116 ✗missed −19
Mar 28 at ATL 19% 110–123 L 113–123 ✓correct +3
Mar 26 at ORL 19% 112–125 L 117–121 ✓correct +9
Mar 24 at CHA 13% 106–123 L 90–134 ✓correct −27
Mar 22 vs BKN 64% 116–111 W 126–122 ✓correct −1
Mar 19 vs PHI 44% 115–117 L 118–139 ✓correct −19
Mar 17 vs SAS 19% 112–125 L 104–132 ✓correct −15
Mar 15 vs UTA 56% 116–114 W 116–111 ✓correct +3
Mar 14 at LAC 14% 109–125 W 118–109 ✗missed +25
Mar 11 vs CHA 19% 106–119 L 109–117 ✓correct +5
Mar 10 vs IND 53% 118–117 W 114–109 ✓correct +4
Mar 8 vs CHI 42% 115–118 W 126–110 ✗missed +19
Mar 5 vs NOP 34% 113–119 L 123–133 ✓correct −4
Mar 3 vs PHX 39% 108–112 L 103–114 ✓correct −7
Mar 1 at LAL 19% 109–122 L 104–128 ✓correct −11
Feb 26 at DAL 31% 115–122 W 130–121 ✗missed +16
Feb 25 at HOU 19% 104–117 L 97–128 ✓correct −18
Feb 23 at MEM 29% 115–123 W 123–114 ✗missed +17
Feb 21 at SAS 8% 103–124 L 122–139 ✓correct +4
Feb 19 vs ORL 31% 108–115 L 94–131 ✓correct −30
Feb 11 at UTA 41% 113–116 L 93–121 ✓correct −25
Feb 9 at NOP 39% 111–115 L 94–120 ✓correct −22
Feb 7 vs CLE 27% 107–116 L 126–132 ✓correct +3
Feb 6 vs LAC 36% 110–115 L 111–114 ✓correct +2
Feb 4 vs MEM 47% 114–115 L 125–129 ✓correct −3
Feb 1 at WAS 61% 114–110 L 112–116 ✗missed −8
Jan 30 at BOS 29% 107–115 L 93–112 ✓correct −11
Jan 29 at PHI 36% 113–118 L 111–113 ✓correct +3
Jan 27 at NYK 26% 107–116 L 87–103 ✓correct −7
Jan 25 at DET 24% 108–118 L 116–139 ✓correct −13
Jan 23 at CLE 31% 112–119 L 118–123 ✓correct +2
Jan 21 vs TOR 42% 111–114 L 109–122 ✓correct −10
Jan 20 vs MIA 44% 116–118 L 117–130 ✓correct −11
Jan 18 vs POR 44% 112–114 L 110–117 ✓correct −5
Jan 16 vs WAS 64% 117–112 W 128–115 ✓correct +8
Jan 14 vs NYK 31% 110–117 W 112–101 ✗missed +18
Jan 12 vs LAL 36% 108–113 W 124–112 ✗missed +17
Jan 11 vs HOU 22% 106–117 W 111–98 ✗missed +24
Jan 9 at GSW 20% 108–120 L 103–137 ✓correct −22
Jan 6 vs DAL 39% 115–119 L 98–100 ✓correct +2
Jan 4 vs MIL 47% 113–114 L 98–115 ✓correct −16
Jan 2 at PHX 20% 107–119 L 102–129 ✓correct −15
Jan 1 vs BOS 29% 110–118 L 106–120 ✓correct −6
Dec 30 at LAC 24% 105–115 L 90–131 ✓correct −31
Dec 28 at LAL 31% 110–117 L 101–125 ✓correct −17
Dec 27 vs DAL 36% 114–119 W 113–107 ✗missed +11
Dec 23 vs DET 24% 112–122 L 127–136 ✓correct +1
Dec 21 vs HOU 24% 109–119 W 125–124 ✗missed +11
Dec 20 vs POR 39% 115–119 L 93–98 ✓correct −1
Dec 18 at POR 39% 115–119 L 133–134 ✓correct +3
Dec 14 at MIN 19% 109–122 L 103–117 ✓correct −1
Dec 11 vs DEN 20% 111–123 L 105–136 ✓correct −19
Dec 8 at IND 39% 113–117 L 105–116 ✓correct −7
Dec 6 at MIA 19% 111–124 W 127–111 ✗missed +29
Dec 3 at HOU 11% 106–124 L 95–121 ✓correct −8
Nov 30 vs MEM 42% 114–117 L 107–115 ✓correct −5
Nov 28 at UTA 47% 119–120 L 119–128 ✓correct −8
Nov 26 vs PHX 34% 114–120 L 100–112 ✓correct −6
Nov 24 vs MIN 22% 114–125 W 117–112 ✗missed +16
Nov 22 at DEN 13% 111–128 W 128–123 ✗missed +22
Nov 20 at MEM 53% 116–115 L 96–137 ✗missed −42
Nov 19 at OKC 7% 106–129 L 99–113 ✓correct +9
Nov 16 at SAS 31% 114–121 L 110–123 ✓correct −6
Nov 14 at MIN 17% 113–127 L 110–124 ✓correct ±0
Nov 12 vs ATL 31% 113–120 L 100–133 ✓correct −26
Nov 11 vs DEN 29% 113–121 L 108–122 ✓correct −6
Nov 9 vs MIN 47% 118–119 L 117–144 ✓correct −26
Nov 7 vs OKC 36% 113–118 L 101–132 ✓correct −26
Nov 5 vs GSW 42% 112–115 W 121–116 ✗missed +8
Nov 3 at DEN 39% 112–116 L 124–130 ✓correct −2
Nov 1 at MIL 36% 113–118 W 135–133 ✗missed +7
Oct 29 at CHI 31% 113–120 L 113–126 ✓correct −6
Oct 28 at OKC 29% 108–116 L 101–107 ✓correct +2
Oct 26 vs LAL 64% 112–107 L 120–127 ✗missed −12
Oct 24 vs UTA 64% 118–113 W 105–104 ✓correct −4
Oct 22 at PHX 58% 116–113 L 116–120 ✗missed −7

2024-25

11.8 pts
average margin miss
90% interval 10.1 to 13.4; 23rd smallest of 30
−1.5
average margin error
+ = better than forecast; 90% interval -4.2 to 1.2
15.2 pts
error variability
std. deviation; league margin miss 11.0
57%
winner picked
82 games involving SAC
40 / 44.9
actual / expected wins
gap −4.9
0.248
Brier score
0.25 = coin flip; lower is better

Expected and actual wins

SAC: cumulative expected wins from pregame win probabilities against actual wins 010203040 40 actual 44.9 exp. 14182 Game number in sample
Solid: actual wins. Dashed: expected wins, the running sum of SAC's pregame win probability in each game.

Margin error, game by game

SAC: margin forecast error in each game, actual minus predicted -40-200+20+40 Better than forecast Worse than forecast Games in date order
Each bar is one game: SAC's actual margin minus its predicted margin, in points. Positive bars sit above the line and negative bars below it, so direction does not depend on color.

How the errors are spread

SAC: distribution of 82 margin errors; mean -1.5 points 0714 -40 to -36 pts: 0 games -36 to -32 pts: 1 games -32 to -28 pts: 3 games -28 to -24 pts: 2 games -24 to -20 pts: 2 games -20 to -16 pts: 7 games -16 to -12 pts: 4 games -12 to -8 pts: 4 games -8 to -4 pts: 9 games -4 to 0 pts: 9 games 0 to 4 pts: 14 games 4 to 8 pts: 7 games 8 to 12 pts: 7 games 12 to 16 pts: 2 games 16 to 20 pts: 4 games 20 to 24 pts: 2 games 24 to 28 pts: 2 games 28 to 32 pts: 0 games 32 to 36 pts: 3 games 36 to 40 pts: 0 games mean -1.5 -40-200+20+40 worse than forecast better than forecast
Each bar counts games whose margin error fell in a 4-point range (errors beyond ±40 are in the end bars). Dashed line: the average error.

SAC against the league

Average margin miss by team, 2024-25, smallest to largest; SAC is 24 of 30 79111315 median 11.0 CHA: 9.26 points over 82 games, 90% interval 7.61–10.89 CHA 9.3 n=82 PHX: 9.49 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.11–10.93 PHX 9.5 n=82 HOU: 9.50 points over 88 games, 90% interval 8.27–10.78 HOU 9.5 n=88 ORL: 10.00 points over 87 games, 90% interval 8.64–11.37 ORL 10.0 n=87 DET: 10.03 points over 88 games, 90% interval 8.78–11.4 DET 10.0 n=88 PHI: 10.11 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.54–11.87 PHI 10.1 n=82 UTA: 10.12 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.48–12.02 UTA 10.1 n=82 NOP: 10.21 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.57–11.82 NOP 10.2 n=82 MIL: 10.27 points over 86 games, 90% interval 8.88–11.77 MIL 10.3 n=86 IND: 10.33 points over 103 games, 90% interval 9.13–11.63 IND 10.3 n=103 SAS: 10.68 points over 80 games, 90% interval 8.99–12.45 SAS 10.7 n=80 ATL: 10.74 points over 81 games, 90% interval 9.4–12.17 ATL 10.7 n=81 BKN: 10.80 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.33–12.39 BKN 10.8 n=82 WAS: 10.84 points over 81 games, 90% interval 9.32–12.23 WAS 10.8 n=81 MIN: 10.93 points over 97 games, 90% interval 9.53–12.36 MIN 10.9 n=97 DAL: 10.99 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.71–12.43 DAL 11.0 n=82 MIA: 11.04 points over 85 games, 90% interval 9.36–12.89 MIA 11.0 n=85 CLE: 11.07 points over 91 games, 90% interval 9.54–12.6 CLE 11.1 n=91 TOR: 11.09 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.52–12.88 TOR 11.1 n=82 LAC: 11.30 points over 89 games, 90% interval 9.74–13 LAC 11.3 n=89 BOS: 11.54 points over 93 games, 90% interval 10.13–13.06 BOS 11.5 n=93 OKC: 11.69 points over 104 games, 90% interval 10.11–13.16 OKC 11.7 n=104 MEM: 11.77 points over 86 games, 90% interval 10.07–13.73 MEM 11.8 n=86 SAC: 11.77 points over 82 games, 90% interval 10.07–13.39 SAC 11.8 n=82 NYK: 11.86 points over 100 games, 90% interval 10.5–13.1 NYK 11.9 n=100 LAL: 11.89 points over 87 games, 90% interval 10.06–13.62 LAL 11.9 n=87 DEN: 11.91 points over 96 games, 90% interval 10.55–13.48 DEN 11.9 n=96 GSW: 12.33 points over 94 games, 90% interval 10.68–13.97 GSW 12.3 n=94 CHI: 12.41 points over 82 games, 90% interval 10.89–13.89 CHI 12.4 n=82 POR: 13.05 points over 82 games, 90% interval 11.32–14.91 POR 13.1 n=82 average margin miss, points (lower = easier to forecast)
Dots: average absolute margin error per team. Lines: 90% bootstrap intervals; overlapping lines mean the difference between those teams is not clear in this sample. Hollow dots: fewer than 20 games.
All 82 games in this sample
DateOpponentSAC win prob.ProjectedFinalPickMargin error
Apr 13 vs PHX 71% 116–108 W 109–98 ✓correct +3
Apr 11 vs LAC 36% 109–115 L 100–101 ✓correct +5
Apr 9 vs DEN 49% 114–115 L 116–124 ✓correct −7
Apr 7 at DET 33% 111–117 W 127–117 ✗missed +16
Apr 6 at CLE 31% 112–119 W 120–113 ✗missed +14
Apr 4 at CHA 66% 115–108 W 125–102 ✓correct +16
Apr 2 at WAS 66% 121–114 L 111–116 ✗missed −12
Mar 31 at IND 36% 112–117 L 109–111 ✓correct +3
Mar 29 at ORL 51% 111–110 L 91–121 ✗missed −31
Mar 27 vs POR 49% 112–113 W 128–107 ✗missed +22
Mar 25 vs OKC 29% 110–119 L 105–121 ✓correct −7
Mar 24 vs BOS 27% 109–119 L 95–113 ✓correct −8
Mar 22 vs MIL 46% 114–116 L 108–114 ✓correct −4
Mar 20 vs CHI 67% 121–115 L 116–128 ✗missed −18
Mar 19 vs CLE 34% 111–118 W 123–119 ✗missed +11
Mar 17 vs MEM 62% 118–114 W 132–122 ✓correct +6
Mar 14 at PHX 59% 117–113 L 106–122 ✗missed −20
Mar 13 at GSW 46% 113–114 L 104–130 ✓correct −25
Mar 10 vs NYK 67% 113–107 L 104–133 ✗missed −35
Mar 9 at LAC 41% 107–110 L 110–111 ✓correct +2
Mar 7 vs SAS 73% 122–113 W 127–109 ✓correct +9
Mar 5 at DEN 33% 112–118 L 110–116 ✓correct ±0
Mar 3 at DAL 51% 115–114 W 122–98 ✓correct +23
Mar 1 at HOU 38% 110–114 W 113–103 ✗missed +14
Feb 26 at UTA 64% 121–115 W 118–101 ✓correct +11
Feb 24 vs CHA 73% 117–108 W 130–88 ✓correct +33
Feb 21 vs GSW 64% 118–113 L 108–132 ✗missed −29
Feb 13 at NOP 75% 125–114 L 133–140 ✗missed −18
Feb 12 at NOP 71% 123–114 W 119–111 ✓correct −1
Feb 10 at DAL 38% 118–122 W 129–128 ✗missed +5
Feb 8 vs NOP 73% 123–114 W 123–118 ✓correct −4
Feb 6 at POR 46% 114–115 L 102–108 ✓correct −5
Feb 5 vs ORL 69% 118–111 L 111–130 ✗missed −26
Feb 3 at MIN 33% 114–120 W 116–114 ✗missed +8
Feb 1 at OKC 21% 112–124 L 110–144 ✓correct −22
Jan 29 at PHI 61% 118–113 L 104–117 ✗missed −18
Jan 27 at BKN 69% 118–110 W 110–96 ✓correct +6
Jan 25 at NYK 41% 115–118 L 120–143 ✓correct −20
Jan 23 at DEN 33% 112–118 L 123–132 ✓correct −3
Jan 22 vs GSW 69% 117–110 W 123–117 ✓correct −1
Jan 19 vs WAS 88% 128–110 W 123–100 ✓correct +5
Jan 16 vs HOU 59% 114–111 W 132–127 ✓correct +2
Jan 14 at MIL 46% 114–115 L 115–130 ✓correct −14
Jan 12 at CHI 56% 117–114 W 124–119 ✓correct +2
Jan 10 at BOS 29% 107–115 W 114–97 ✗missed +25
Jan 6 vs MIA 64% 116–111 W 123–118 ✓correct ±0
Jan 5 at GSW 41% 114–117 W 129–99 ✗missed +33
Jan 3 vs MEM 54% 117–116 W 138–133 ✓correct +4
Jan 1 vs PHI 71% 117–109 W 113–107 ✓correct −2
Dec 30 vs DAL 64% 119–114 W 110–100 ✓correct +5
Dec 28 at LAL 41% 113–116 L 122–132 ✓correct −7
Dec 26 vs DET 69% 122–115 L 113–114 ✗missed −8
Dec 22 vs IND 64% 120–115 L 95–122 ✗missed −32
Dec 21 vs LAL 71% 118–110 L 99–103 ✗missed −12
Dec 19 vs LAL 67% 118–112 L 100–113 ✗missed −19
Dec 16 vs DEN 54% 119–118 L 129–130 ✗missed −2
Dec 12 at NOP 71% 122–113 W 111–109 ✓correct −7
Dec 8 vs UTA 77% 120–109 W 141–97 ✓correct +33
Dec 6 at SAS 54% 114–112 W 140–113 ✓correct +25
Dec 5 at MEM 29% 113–121 L 110–115 ✓correct +3
Dec 3 vs HOU 49% 115–116 W 120–111 ✗missed +10
Dec 1 vs SAS 44% 110–113 L 125–127 ✓correct +1
Nov 29 at POR 54% 113–111 L 106–115 ✗missed −11
Nov 27 at MIN 31% 106–113 W 115–104 ✗missed +18
Nov 25 vs OKC 49% 110–111 L 109–130 ✓correct −20
Nov 24 vs BKN 71% 114–106 L 103–108 ✗missed −13
Nov 22 at LAC 46% 108–109 L 88–104 ✓correct −15
Nov 18 vs ATL 59% 121–118 L 108–109 ✗missed −4
Nov 16 vs UTA 62% 115–111 W 121–117 ✓correct ±0
Nov 15 vs MIN 62% 112–108 L 126–130 ✗missed −8
Nov 13 vs PHX 67% 115–109 W 127–104 ✓correct +17
Nov 11 at SAS 59% 112–108 L 96–116 ✗missed −24
Nov 10 at PHX 43% 112–114 W 127–118 ✗missed +11
Nov 8 vs LAC 64% 113–108 L 98–107 ✗missed −14
Nov 6 vs TOR 81% 125–112 W 122–107 ✓correct +2
Nov 4 at MIA 46% 109–110 W 111–110 ✗missed +2
Nov 2 at TOR 69% 119–111 L 128–131 ✗missed −11
Nov 1 at ATL 64% 119–113 W 123–115 ✓correct +2
Oct 29 at UTA 64% 117–111 W 113–96 ✓correct +11
Oct 28 vs POR 75% 116–106 W 111–98 ✓correct +3
Oct 26 at LAL 41% 109–112 L 127–131 ✓correct −1
Oct 24 vs MIN 62% 111–107 L 115–117 ✗missed −6

2023-24

12.4 pts
average margin miss
90% interval 10.7 to 14.1; 26th smallest of 30
−0.5
average margin error
+ = better than forecast; 90% interval -3.4 to 2.4
15.7 pts
error variability
std. deviation; league margin miss 11.3
55%
winner picked
82 games involving SAC
46 / 44.5
actual / expected wins
gap +1.6
0.241
Brier score
0.25 = coin flip; lower is better

Expected and actual wins

SAC: cumulative expected wins from pregame win probabilities against actual wins 01020304050 46 actual 44.5 exp. 14182 Game number in sample
Solid: actual wins. Dashed: expected wins, the running sum of SAC's pregame win probability in each game.

Margin error, game by game

SAC: margin forecast error in each game, actual minus predicted -40-200+20+40 Better than forecast Worse than forecast Games in date order
Each bar is one game: SAC's actual margin minus its predicted margin, in points. Positive bars sit above the line and negative bars below it, so direction does not depend on color.

How the errors are spread

SAC: distribution of 82 margin errors; mean -0.5 points 0612 -40 to -36 pts: 2 games -36 to -32 pts: 1 games -32 to -28 pts: 2 games -28 to -24 pts: 0 games -24 to -20 pts: 3 games -20 to -16 pts: 5 games -16 to -12 pts: 7 games -12 to -8 pts: 4 games -8 to -4 pts: 6 games -4 to 0 pts: 9 games 0 to 4 pts: 8 games 4 to 8 pts: 8 games 8 to 12 pts: 12 games 12 to 16 pts: 3 games 16 to 20 pts: 4 games 20 to 24 pts: 3 games 24 to 28 pts: 2 games 28 to 32 pts: 2 games 32 to 36 pts: 0 games 36 to 40 pts: 1 games mean -0.5 -40-200+20+40 worse than forecast better than forecast
Each bar counts games whose margin error fell in a 4-point range (errors beyond ±40 are in the end bars). Dashed line: the average error.

SAC against the league

Average margin miss by team, 2023-24, smallest to largest; SAC is 26 of 30 79111315 median 11.0 PHX: 9.80 points over 86 games, 90% interval 8.63–11.01 PHX 9.8 n=86 WAS: 9.90 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.41–11.39 WAS 9.9 n=82 DET: 9.91 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.51–11.34 DET 9.9 n=82 CHI: 9.93 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.67–11.28 CHI 9.9 n=82 GSW: 10.13 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.49–11.84 GSW 10.1 n=82 DEN: 10.16 points over 94 games, 90% interval 8.71–11.82 DEN 10.2 n=94 LAC: 10.31 points over 88 games, 90% interval 8.94–11.67 LAC 10.3 n=88 HOU: 10.49 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.09–11.87 HOU 10.5 n=82 CHA: 10.60 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.87–12.37 CHA 10.6 n=82 SAS: 10.68 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.16–12.34 SAS 10.7 n=82 TOR: 10.71 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.94–12.41 TOR 10.7 n=82 PHI: 10.78 points over 88 games, 90% interval 9.32–12.18 PHI 10.8 n=88 LAL: 10.83 points over 87 games, 90% interval 9.3–12.37 LAL 10.8 n=87 MIN: 10.89 points over 98 games, 90% interval 9.4–12.27 MIN 10.9 n=98 ORL: 10.98 points over 89 games, 90% interval 9.61–12.31 ORL 11.0 n=89 MIA: 10.99 points over 87 games, 90% interval 9.3–12.83 MIA 11.0 n=87 MEM: 11.02 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.62–12.49 MEM 11.0 n=82 POR: 11.09 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.3–12.93 POR 11.1 n=82 BKN: 11.41 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.83–13.12 BKN 11.4 n=82 ATL: 11.43 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.74–13.3 ATL 11.4 n=82 NYK: 11.46 points over 95 games, 90% interval 10.13–12.84 NYK 11.5 n=95 CLE: 11.88 points over 94 games, 90% interval 10.45–13.49 CLE 11.9 n=94 UTA: 11.94 points over 82 games, 90% interval 10.29–13.62 UTA 11.9 n=82 OKC: 12.10 points over 92 games, 90% interval 10.34–13.93 OKC 12.1 n=92 MIL: 12.23 points over 88 games, 90% interval 10.58–13.77 MIL 12.2 n=88 SAC: 12.38 points over 82 games, 90% interval 10.73–14.11 SAC 12.4 n=82 IND: 12.71 points over 99 games, 90% interval 11.15–14.27 IND 12.7 n=99 BOS: 12.86 points over 101 games, 90% interval 11.3–14.57 BOS 12.9 n=101 DAL: 13.09 points over 104 games, 90% interval 11.49–14.72 DAL 13.1 n=104 NOP: 13.56 points over 86 games, 90% interval 11.94–15.36 NOP 13.6 n=86 average margin miss, points (lower = easier to forecast)
Dots: average absolute margin error per team. Lines: 90% bootstrap intervals; overlapping lines mean the difference between those teams is not clear in this sample. Hollow dots: fewer than 20 games.
All 82 games in this sample
DateOpponentSAC win prob.ProjectedFinalPickMargin error
Apr 14 vs POR 82% 115–99 W 121–82 ✓correct +23
Apr 12 vs PHX 57% 110–109 L 107–108 ✗missed −2
Apr 11 vs NOP 57% 108–107 L 123–135 ✗missed −13
Apr 9 at OKC 35% 108–113 L 105–112 ✓correct −2
Apr 7 at BKN 57% 113–107 W 107–77 ✓correct +24
Apr 5 at BOS 47% 109–108 L 100–101 ✗missed −2
Apr 4 at NYK 34% 104–110 L 109–120 ✓correct −5
Apr 2 vs LAC 53% 108–109 W 109–95 ✗missed +15
Mar 31 vs UTA 75% 115–104 W 127–106 ✓correct +10
Mar 29 vs DAL 57% 113–112 L 103–107 ✗missed −5
Mar 26 vs DAL 63% 114–110 L 96–132 ✗missed −40
Mar 25 vs PHI 65% 112–107 W 108–96 ✓correct +7
Mar 23 at ORL 39% 108–111 W 109–107 ✗missed +5
Mar 21 at WAS 63% 122–113 L 102–109 ✗missed −16
Mar 20 at TOR 75% 122–106 W 123–89 ✓correct +18
Mar 18 vs MEM 78% 115–102 W 121–111 ✓correct −3
Mar 16 vs NYK 59% 110–108 L 91–98 ✗missed −9
Mar 13 vs LAL 61% 118–115 W 120–107 ✓correct +10
Mar 12 vs MIL 51% 113–115 W 129–94 ✗missed +37
Mar 10 vs HOU 61% 117–114 L 104–112 ✗missed −11
Mar 7 vs SAS 76% 122–110 W 131–129 ✓correct −10
Mar 6 at LAL 43% 117–118 W 130–120 ✗missed +11
Mar 4 vs CHI 57% 113–112 L 109–113 ✗missed −5
Mar 1 at MIN 37% 113–117 W 124–120 ✗missed +8
Feb 28 at DEN 34% 111–117 L 96–117 ✓correct −15
Feb 26 vs MIA 72% 122–113 L 110–121 ✗missed −20
Feb 25 at LAC 30% 113–121 W 123–107 ✗missed +24
Feb 22 vs SAS 73% 121–111 W 127–122 ✓correct −5
Feb 14 at DEN 34% 110–116 W 102–98 ✗missed +10
Feb 13 at PHX 34% 114–120 L 125–130 ✓correct +1
Feb 11 at OKC 32% 112–119 L 113–127 ✓correct −7
Feb 9 vs DEN 51% 114–116 W 135–106 ✗missed +31
Feb 7 vs DET 82% 127–111 L 120–133 ✗missed −29
Feb 5 at CLE 34% 112–118 L 110–136 ✓correct −20
Feb 3 at CHI 43% 116–117 W 123–115 ✗missed +9
Feb 2 at IND 41% 116–118 W 133–122 ✗missed +13
Jan 31 at MIA 55% 115–110 L 106–115 ✗missed −14
Jan 29 at MEM 59% 116–109 W 103–94 ✓correct +2
Jan 27 at DAL 53% 122–118 W 120–115 ✓correct +1
Jan 25 at GSW 53% 122–118 W 134–133 ✓correct −3
Jan 22 vs ATL 72% 124–115 W 122–107 ✓correct +6
Jan 18 vs IND 57% 118–117 L 121–126 ✗missed −6
Jan 16 at PHX 43% 116–117 L 117–119 ✓correct −1
Jan 14 at MIL 39% 115–118 L 142–143 ✓correct +2
Jan 12 at PHI 41% 112–114 L 93–112 ✓correct −17
Jan 10 at CHA 59% 117–110 W 123–98 ✓correct +18
Jan 9 at DET 55% 121–116 W 131–110 ✓correct +16
Jan 7 vs NOP 59% 116–114 L 100–133 ✗missed −35
Jan 5 vs TOR 61% 118–115 W 135–130 ✓correct +2
Jan 3 vs ORL 61% 118–115 W 138–135 ✓correct ±0
Jan 2 vs CHA 81% 123–108 L 104–111 ✗missed −22
Dec 31 at MEM 51% 117–114 W 123–92 ✓correct +28
Dec 29 at ATL 49% 122–120 W 117–110 ✓correct +5
Dec 26 at POR 53% 119–115 L 113–130 ✗missed −21
Dec 23 vs MIN 59% 118–116 L 98–110 ✗missed −14
Dec 22 vs PHX 61% 120–117 W 120–105 ✓correct +12
Dec 20 vs BOS 63% 118–114 L 119–144 ✗missed −29
Dec 18 vs WAS 70% 121–113 W 143–131 ✓correct +4
Dec 16 vs UTA 76% 122–110 W 125–104 ✓correct +9
Dec 14 vs OKC 59% 116–114 W 128–123 ✓correct +3
Dec 12 at LAC 34% 112–118 L 99–119 ✓correct −14
Dec 11 vs BKN 61% 117–114 W 131–118 ✓correct +10
Dec 8 at PHX 49% 117–115 W 114–106 ✓correct +6
Dec 4 vs NOP 61% 119–116 L 117–127 ✗missed −13
Dec 2 vs DEN 57% 116–115 W 123–117 ✓correct +5
Nov 29 vs LAC 65% 117–112 L 117–131 ✗missed −19
Nov 28 vs GSW 61% 118–115 W 124–123 ✓correct −2
Nov 24 at MIN 32% 110–117 W 124–111 ✗missed +20
Nov 22 at NOP 43% 116–117 L 112–117 ✓correct −4
Nov 20 at NOP 49% 116–114 L 93–129 ✗missed −38
Nov 19 at DAL 37% 116–120 W 129–113 ✗missed +20
Nov 17 at SAS 59% 120–113 W 129–120 ✓correct +2
Nov 15 at LAL 41% 112–114 W 125–110 ✗missed +17
Nov 13 vs CLE 57% 112–111 W 132–120 ✓correct +11
Nov 10 vs OKC 53% 114–115 W 105–98 ✗missed +8
Nov 8 vs POR 67% 117–111 W 121–118 ✓correct −3
Nov 6 at HOU 43% 113–114 L 97–122 ✓correct −24
Nov 4 at HOU 49% 117–115 L 89–107 ✗missed −20
Nov 1 at GSW 27% 109–119 L 101–102 ✓correct +9
Oct 29 vs LAL 57% 116–115 W 132–127 ✓correct +4
Oct 27 vs GSW 59% 116–114 L 114–122 ✗missed −10
Oct 25 at UTA 55% 118–113 W 130–114 ✓correct +11

2022-23

11.0 pts
average margin miss
90% interval 9.4 to 12.6; 22nd smallest of 30
+1.4
average margin error
+ = better than forecast; 90% interval -1.0 to 3.7
14.0 pts
error variability
std. deviation; league margin miss 10.3
52%
winner picked
89 games involving SAC
51 / 46.1
actual / expected wins
gap +4.9
0.259
Brier score
0.25 = coin flip; lower is better

Expected and actual wins

SAC: cumulative expected wins from pregame win probabilities against actual wins 01020304050 51 actual 46.1 exp. 14589 Game number in sample
Solid: actual wins. Dashed: expected wins, the running sum of SAC's pregame win probability in each game.

Margin error, game by game

SAC: margin forecast error in each game, actual minus predicted -50-250+25+50 Better than forecast Worse than forecast Games in date order
Each bar is one game: SAC's actual margin minus its predicted margin, in points. Positive bars sit above the line and negative bars below it, so direction does not depend on color.

How the errors are spread

SAC: distribution of 89 margin errors; mean +1.4 points 0816 -40 to -36 pts: 1 games -36 to -32 pts: 0 games -32 to -28 pts: 1 games -28 to -24 pts: 1 games -24 to -20 pts: 4 games -20 to -16 pts: 4 games -16 to -12 pts: 2 games -12 to -8 pts: 3 games -8 to -4 pts: 14 games -4 to 0 pts: 7 games 0 to 4 pts: 10 games 4 to 8 pts: 16 games 8 to 12 pts: 7 games 12 to 16 pts: 5 games 16 to 20 pts: 6 games 20 to 24 pts: 3 games 24 to 28 pts: 0 games 28 to 32 pts: 4 games 32 to 36 pts: 0 games 36 to 40 pts: 1 games mean +1.4 -40-200+20+40 worse than forecast better than forecast
Each bar counts games whose margin error fell in a 4-point range (errors beyond ±40 are in the end bars). Dashed line: the average error.

SAC against the league

Average margin miss by team, 2022-23, smallest to largest; SAC is 22 of 30 68101214 median 10.2 UTA: 8.74 points over 82 games, 90% interval 7.41–10.06 UTA 8.7 n=82 DET: 8.82 points over 82 games, 90% interval 7.57–10.1 DET 8.8 n=82 HOU: 9.06 points over 82 games, 90% interval 7.78–10.33 HOU 9.1 n=82 IND: 9.06 points over 82 games, 90% interval 7.91–10.26 IND 9.1 n=82 LAL: 9.19 points over 98 games, 90% interval 8.13–10.45 LAL 9.2 n=98 TOR: 9.30 points over 82 games, 90% interval 7.98–10.65 TOR 9.3 n=82 MIA: 9.42 points over 105 games, 90% interval 8.16–10.73 MIA 9.4 n=105 CLE: 9.63 points over 87 games, 90% interval 8.48–10.79 CLE 9.6 n=87 NYK: 9.65 points over 93 games, 90% interval 8.48–10.83 NYK 9.7 n=93 ORL: 9.88 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.6–11.21 ORL 9.9 n=82 DAL: 9.90 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.27–11.59 DAL 9.9 n=82 LAC: 9.90 points over 87 games, 90% interval 8.76–11.17 LAC 9.9 n=87 WAS: 10.06 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.61–11.52 WAS 10.1 n=82 ATL: 10.20 points over 88 games, 90% interval 8.92–11.51 ATL 10.2 n=88 PHI: 10.20 points over 93 games, 90% interval 8.81–11.6 PHI 10.2 n=93 MIN: 10.21 points over 87 games, 90% interval 8.99–11.47 MIN 10.2 n=87 OKC: 10.23 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.93–11.55 OKC 10.2 n=82 DEN: 10.51 points over 102 games, 90% interval 9.1–11.93 DEN 10.5 n=102 PHX: 10.81 points over 93 games, 90% interval 9.25–12.28 PHX 10.8 n=93 NOP: 10.82 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.34–12.26 NOP 10.8 n=82 CHA: 10.84 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.38–12.3 CHA 10.8 n=82 SAC: 10.99 points over 89 games, 90% interval 9.44–12.58 SAC 11.0 n=89 GSW: 11.24 points over 95 games, 90% interval 9.8–12.77 GSW 11.2 n=95 MEM: 11.40 points over 88 games, 90% interval 9.83–13.05 MEM 11.4 n=88 POR: 11.41 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.96–12.94 POR 11.4 n=82 BKN: 11.45 points over 86 games, 90% interval 9.79–13.3 BKN 11.4 n=86 BOS: 11.54 points over 102 games, 90% interval 9.99–13.05 BOS 11.5 n=102 CHI: 11.72 points over 82 games, 90% interval 10.11–13.48 CHI 11.7 n=82 MIL: 11.77 points over 87 games, 90% interval 10.3–13.32 MIL 11.8 n=87 SAS: 12.16 points over 82 games, 90% interval 10.54–13.79 SAS 12.2 n=82 average margin miss, points (lower = easier to forecast)
Dots: average absolute margin error per team. Lines: 90% bootstrap intervals; overlapping lines mean the difference between those teams is not clear in this sample. Hollow dots: fewer than 20 games.
All 89 games in this sample
DateOpponentSAC win prob.ProjectedFinalPickMargin error
Apr 30 PO vs GSW 53% 111–110 L 100–120 ✗missed −21
Apr 28 PO at GSW 28% 109–118 W 118–99 ✗missed +28
Apr 26 PO vs GSW 53% 115–114 L 116–123 ✗missed −8
Apr 23 PO at GSW 30% 108–116 L 125–126 ✓correct +7
Apr 20 PO at GSW 28% 108–117 L 97–114 ✓correct −8
Apr 17 PO vs GSW 63% 116–111 W 114–106 ✓correct +3
Apr 15 PO vs GSW 70% 121–113 W 126–123 ✓correct −5
Apr 9 at DEN 65% 117–111 L 95–109 ✗missed −20
Apr 7 vs GSW 58% 118–115 L 97–119 ✗missed −25
Apr 5 at DAL 47% 119–120 L 119–123 ✓correct −3
Apr 4 at NOP 45% 115–117 W 121–103 ✗missed +20
Apr 2 vs SAS 90% 124–103 L 134–142 ✗missed −29
Mar 31 at POR 80% 127–114 W 138–114 ✓correct +11
Mar 29 at POR 76% 127–116 W 120–80 ✓correct +29
Mar 27 vs MIN 60% 120–116 L 115–119 ✗missed −8
Mar 25 vs UTA 68% 123–116 W 121–113 ✓correct +1
Mar 24 vs PHX 60% 122–118 W 135–127 ✓correct +4
Mar 21 vs BOS 37% 111–116 L 109–132 ✓correct −18
Mar 20 at UTA 68% 126–119 L 120–128 ✗missed −15
Mar 18 at WAS 47% 114–115 W 132–118 ✗missed +15
Mar 16 at BKN 47% 118–119 W 101–96 ✗missed +6
Mar 15 at CHI 40% 115–119 W 117–114 ✗missed +7
Mar 13 vs MIL 47% 118–119 L 124–133 ✓correct −8
Mar 11 at PHX 30% 113–121 W 128–119 ✗missed +17
Mar 9 vs NYK 45% 117–119 W 122–117 ✗missed +7
Mar 6 vs NOP 45% 113–115 W 123–108 ✗missed +17
Mar 4 vs MIN 53% 117–116 L 134–138 ✗missed −5
Mar 3 vs LAC 60% 120–116 W 128–127 ✓correct −3
Feb 28 at OKC 42% 117–120 W 123–117 ✗missed +9
Feb 26 at OKC 37% 117–122 W 124–115 ✗missed +14
Feb 24 at LAC 45% 114–116 W 176–175 ✗missed +3
Feb 23 vs POR 68% 126–119 W 133–116 ✓correct +10
Feb 14 at PHX 45% 113–115 L 109–120 ✓correct −9
Feb 11 vs DAL 47% 113–114 W 133–128 ✗missed +6
Feb 10 vs DAL 65% 114–108 L 114–122 ✗missed −14
Feb 8 at HOU 60% 121–117 W 130–128 ✓correct −2
Feb 6 at HOU 60% 121–117 W 140–120 ✓correct +16
Feb 5 at NOP 72% 118–109 L 104–136 ✗missed −41
Feb 3 at IND 60% 123–119 L 104–107 ✗missed −7
Feb 1 at SAS 60% 123–119 W 119–109 ✓correct +6
Jan 30 at MIN 40% 117–121 W 118–111 ✗missed +11
Jan 28 at MIN 45% 117–119 L 110–117 ✓correct −5
Jan 25 vs TOR 58% 116–113 L 95–113 ✗missed −21
Jan 23 vs MEM 58% 119–116 W 133–100 ✓correct +30
Jan 21 vs PHI 45% 115–117 L 127–129 ✓correct ±0
Jan 20 vs OKC 60% 119–115 W 118–113 ✓correct +1
Jan 18 at LAL 47% 119–120 W 116–111 ✗missed +6
Jan 15 at SAS 60% 124–120 W 132–119 ✓correct +9
Jan 13 vs HOU 83% 123–108 W 139–114 ✓correct +10
Jan 11 vs HOU 80% 123–110 W 135–115 ✓correct +7
Jan 9 vs ORL 63% 122–117 W 136–111 ✓correct +20
Jan 7 vs LAL 53% 119–118 L 134–136 ✗missed −3
Jan 4 vs ATL 55% 119–117 L 117–120 ✗missed −5
Jan 3 at UTA 47% 116–117 W 117–115 ✗missed +3
Jan 1 at MEM 42% 112–115 L 108–118 ✓correct −7
Dec 30 vs UTA 58% 117–114 W 126–125 ✓correct −2
Dec 28 vs DEN 37% 114–119 W 127–126 ✗missed +6
Dec 27 vs DEN 45% 116–118 L 106–113 ✓correct −5
Dec 23 vs WAS 65% 119–113 L 111–125 ✗missed −20
Dec 21 vs LAL 65% 119–113 W 134–120 ✓correct +8
Dec 19 vs CHA 83% 121–106 L 119–125 ✗missed −21
Dec 16 at DET 70% 120–112 W 122–113 ✓correct +1
Dec 14 at TOR 42% 111–114 W 124–123 ✗missed +4
Dec 13 at PHI 45% 111–113 L 103–123 ✓correct −18
Dec 11 at NYK 45% 111–113 L 99–112 ✓correct −11
Dec 9 at CLE 37% 106–111 W 106–95 ✗missed +16
Dec 7 at MIL 35% 111–117 L 113–126 ✓correct −7
Dec 4 vs CHI 65% 119–113 W 110–101 ✓correct +3
Dec 3 at LAC 47% 116–117 W 123–96 ✗missed +28
Nov 30 vs IND 53% 119–118 W 137–114 ✓correct +22
Nov 28 vs PHX 45% 117–119 L 117–122 ✓correct −3
Nov 25 at BOS 35% 114–120 L 104–122 ✓correct −12
Nov 23 at ATL 32% 113–120 L 106–115 ✓correct −2
Nov 22 at MEM 28% 111–120 W 113–109 ✗missed +13
Nov 20 vs DET 83% 122–107 W 137–129 ✓correct −7
Nov 17 vs SAS 81% 121–107 W 130–112 ✓correct +4
Nov 15 vs BKN 40% 109–113 W 153–121 ✗missed +36
Nov 13 vs GSW 37% 114–119 W 122–115 ✗missed +12
Nov 11 at LAL 63% 113–108 W 120–114 ✓correct +1
Nov 9 vs CLE 26% 105–115 W 127–120 ✗missed +17
Nov 7 at GSW 42% 111–114 L 113–116 ✓correct ±0
Nov 5 at ORL 47% 113–114 W 126–123 ✗missed +4
Nov 2 at MIA 30% 106–114 L 107–110 ✓correct +5
Oct 31 at CHA 24% 108–119 W 115–108 ✗missed +18
Oct 29 vs MIA 35% 106–112 W 119–113 ✗missed +12
Oct 27 vs MEM 32% 111–118 L 110–125 ✓correct −8
Oct 23 at GSW 28% 106–115 L 125–130 ✓correct +4
Oct 22 vs LAC 35% 110–116 L 109–111 ✓correct +4
Oct 19 vs POR 81% 116–102 L 108–115 ✗missed −21

2022-23 to 2026-27

11.7 pts
average margin miss
90% interval 10.8 to 12.5; 28th smallest of 30
−1.1
average margin error
+ = better than forecast; 90% interval -2.4 to 0.2
14.8 pts
error variability
std. deviation; league margin miss 11.0
60%
winner picked
345 games involving SAC
160 / 166.2
actual / expected wins
gap −6.2
0.236
Brier score
0.25 = coin flip; lower is better

Expected and actual wins

SAC: cumulative expected wins from pregame win probabilities against actual wins 0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170 160 actual 166.2 exp. 1173345 Game number in sample
Solid: actual wins. Dashed: expected wins, the running sum of SAC's pregame win probability in each game.

Margin error, game by game

SAC: margin forecast error in each game, actual minus predicted -50-250+25+50 Better than forecast Worse than forecast Games in date order
Each bar is one game: SAC's actual margin minus its predicted margin, in points. Positive bars sit above the line and negative bars below it, so direction does not depend on color.

How the errors are spread

SAC: distribution of 345 margin errors; mean -1.1 points 02345 -40 to -36 pts: 4 games -36 to -32 pts: 2 games -32 to -28 pts: 8 games -28 to -24 pts: 9 games -24 to -20 pts: 11 games -20 to -16 pts: 23 games -16 to -12 pts: 18 games -12 to -8 pts: 18 games -8 to -4 pts: 44 games -4 to 0 pts: 35 games 0 to 4 pts: 45 games 4 to 8 pts: 36 games 8 to 12 pts: 33 games 12 to 16 pts: 10 games 16 to 20 pts: 21 games 20 to 24 pts: 9 games 24 to 28 pts: 7 games 28 to 32 pts: 7 games 32 to 36 pts: 3 games 36 to 40 pts: 2 games mean -1.1 -40-200+20+40 worse than forecast better than forecast
Each bar counts games whose margin error fell in a 4-point range (errors beyond ±40 are in the end bars). Dashed line: the average error.

SAC against the league

Average margin miss by team, 2022-23 to 2026-27, smallest to largest; SAC is 28 of 30 891011121314 median 11.0 DET: 9.80 points over 356 games, 90% interval 9.17–10.47 DET 9.8 n=356 HOU: 10.09 points over 350 games, 90% interval 9.46–10.73 HOU 10.1 n=350 PHX: 10.25 points over 355 games, 90% interval 9.56–10.97 PHX 10.3 n=355 ORL: 10.50 points over 353 games, 90% interval 9.8–11.22 ORL 10.5 n=353 UTA: 10.63 points over 338 games, 90% interval 9.81–11.47 UTA 10.6 n=338 PHI: 10.64 points over 367 games, 90% interval 9.93–11.41 PHI 10.6 n=367 IND: 10.67 points over 376 games, 90% interval 9.99–11.4 IND 10.7 n=376 LAL: 10.71 points over 375 games, 90% interval 10.03–11.43 LAL 10.7 n=375 CLE: 10.74 points over 382 games, 90% interval 10.07–11.47 CLE 10.7 n=382 WAS: 10.74 points over 337 games, 90% interval 10.06–11.49 WAS 10.7 n=337 LAC: 10.76 points over 355 games, 90% interval 10.03–11.52 LAC 10.8 n=355 DEN: 10.83 points over 388 games, 90% interval 10.1–11.61 DEN 10.8 n=388 SAS: 10.88 points over 357 games, 90% interval 10.14–11.63 SAS 10.9 n=357 MIA: 10.95 points over 369 games, 90% interval 10.19–11.7 MIA 10.9 n=369 NOP: 10.98 points over 342 games, 90% interval 10.27–11.74 NOP 11.0 n=342 TOR: 11.08 points over 344 games, 90% interval 10.29–11.88 TOR 11.1 n=344 GSW: 11.12 points over 363 games, 90% interval 10.4–11.91 GSW 11.1 n=363 DAL: 11.15 points over 359 games, 90% interval 10.45–11.87 DAL 11.2 n=359 CHA: 11.18 points over 338 games, 90% interval 10.34–12.05 CHA 11.2 n=338 MIN: 11.18 points over 387 games, 90% interval 10.53–11.91 MIN 11.2 n=387 ATL: 11.32 points over 350 games, 90% interval 10.57–12.13 ATL 11.3 n=350 MEM: 11.35 points over 345 games, 90% interval 10.54–12.23 MEM 11.3 n=345 CHI: 11.43 points over 337 games, 90% interval 10.66–12.23 CHI 11.4 n=337 OKC: 11.49 points over 384 games, 90% interval 10.7–12.29 OKC 11.5 n=384 BKN: 11.55 points over 342 games, 90% interval 10.75–12.41 BKN 11.6 n=342 POR: 11.61 points over 342 games, 90% interval 10.75–12.42 POR 11.6 n=342 NYK: 11.63 points over 396 games, 90% interval 10.88–12.36 NYK 11.6 n=396 SAC: 11.66 points over 345 games, 90% interval 10.84–12.46 SAC 11.7 n=345 MIL: 11.68 points over 353 games, 90% interval 10.92–12.46 MIL 11.7 n=353 BOS: 11.96 points over 395 games, 90% interval 11.24–12.73 BOS 12.0 n=395 average margin miss, points (lower = easier to forecast)
Dots: average absolute margin error per team. Lines: 90% bootstrap intervals; overlapping lines mean the difference between those teams is not clear in this sample. Hollow dots: fewer than 20 games.
All 345 games in this sample
DateOpponentSAC win prob.ProjectedFinalPickMargin error
Nov 8 vs MIA 35% 118–123 L 108–114 ✓correct −1
Nov 6 vs SAS 23% 111–121 L 109–124 ✓correct −5
Nov 4 vs LAL 23% 112–124 L 103–116 ✓correct −1
Nov 2 at DAL 26% 114–123 W 115–100 ✗missed +24
Oct 31 at MEM 41% 119–122 L 105–136 ✓correct −28
Oct 29 at NOP 44% 120–122 L 120–132 ✓correct −10
Oct 27 at SAS 15% 108–123 L 103–130 ✓correct −12
Oct 25 vs MEM 56% 119–117 L 112–123 ✗missed −13
Oct 23 vs POR 36% 112–117 L 120–128 ✓correct −3
Oct 21 at LAC 31% 111–118 L 96–121 ✓correct −18
Apr 12 at POR 17% 105–119 L 110–122 ✓correct +2
Apr 10 vs GSW 42% 114–117 W 124–118 ✗missed +9
Apr 7 at GSW 36% 111–116 L 105–110 ✓correct ±0
Apr 5 vs LAC 27% 110–119 L 109–138 ✓correct −20
Apr 3 vs NOP 44% 113–115 W 117–113 ✗missed +6
Apr 1 at TOR 22% 108–119 W 123–115 ✗missed +19
Mar 29 at BKN 56% 113–111 L 99–116 ✗missed −19
Mar 28 at ATL 19% 110–123 L 113–123 ✓correct +3
Mar 26 at ORL 19% 112–125 L 117–121 ✓correct +9
Mar 24 at CHA 13% 106–123 L 90–134 ✓correct −27
Mar 22 vs BKN 64% 116–111 W 126–122 ✓correct −1
Mar 19 vs PHI 44% 115–117 L 118–139 ✓correct −19
Mar 17 vs SAS 19% 112–125 L 104–132 ✓correct −15
Mar 15 vs UTA 56% 116–114 W 116–111 ✓correct +3
Mar 14 at LAC 14% 109–125 W 118–109 ✗missed +25
Mar 11 vs CHA 19% 106–119 L 109–117 ✓correct +5
Mar 10 vs IND 53% 118–117 W 114–109 ✓correct +4
Mar 8 vs CHI 42% 115–118 W 126–110 ✗missed +19
Mar 5 vs NOP 34% 113–119 L 123–133 ✓correct −4
Mar 3 vs PHX 39% 108–112 L 103–114 ✓correct −7
Mar 1 at LAL 19% 109–122 L 104–128 ✓correct −11
Feb 26 at DAL 31% 115–122 W 130–121 ✗missed +16
Feb 25 at HOU 19% 104–117 L 97–128 ✓correct −18
Feb 23 at MEM 29% 115–123 W 123–114 ✗missed +17
Feb 21 at SAS 8% 103–124 L 122–139 ✓correct +4
Feb 19 vs ORL 31% 108–115 L 94–131 ✓correct −30
Feb 11 at UTA 41% 113–116 L 93–121 ✓correct −25
Feb 9 at NOP 39% 111–115 L 94–120 ✓correct −22
Feb 7 vs CLE 27% 107–116 L 126–132 ✓correct +3
Feb 6 vs LAC 36% 110–115 L 111–114 ✓correct +2
Feb 4 vs MEM 47% 114–115 L 125–129 ✓correct −3
Feb 1 at WAS 61% 114–110 L 112–116 ✗missed −8
Jan 30 at BOS 29% 107–115 L 93–112 ✓correct −11
Jan 29 at PHI 36% 113–118 L 111–113 ✓correct +3
Jan 27 at NYK 26% 107–116 L 87–103 ✓correct −7
Jan 25 at DET 24% 108–118 L 116–139 ✓correct −13
Jan 23 at CLE 31% 112–119 L 118–123 ✓correct +2
Jan 21 vs TOR 42% 111–114 L 109–122 ✓correct −10
Jan 20 vs MIA 44% 116–118 L 117–130 ✓correct −11
Jan 18 vs POR 44% 112–114 L 110–117 ✓correct −5
Jan 16 vs WAS 64% 117–112 W 128–115 ✓correct +8
Jan 14 vs NYK 31% 110–117 W 112–101 ✗missed +18
Jan 12 vs LAL 36% 108–113 W 124–112 ✗missed +17
Jan 11 vs HOU 22% 106–117 W 111–98 ✗missed +24
Jan 9 at GSW 20% 108–120 L 103–137 ✓correct −22
Jan 6 vs DAL 39% 115–119 L 98–100 ✓correct +2
Jan 4 vs MIL 47% 113–114 L 98–115 ✓correct −16
Jan 2 at PHX 20% 107–119 L 102–129 ✓correct −15
Jan 1 vs BOS 29% 110–118 L 106–120 ✓correct −6
Dec 30 at LAC 24% 105–115 L 90–131 ✓correct −31
Dec 28 at LAL 31% 110–117 L 101–125 ✓correct −17
Dec 27 vs DAL 36% 114–119 W 113–107 ✗missed +11
Dec 23 vs DET 24% 112–122 L 127–136 ✓correct +1
Dec 21 vs HOU 24% 109–119 W 125–124 ✗missed +11
Dec 20 vs POR 39% 115–119 L 93–98 ✓correct −1
Dec 18 at POR 39% 115–119 L 133–134 ✓correct +3
Dec 14 at MIN 19% 109–122 L 103–117 ✓correct −1
Dec 11 vs DEN 20% 111–123 L 105–136 ✓correct −19
Dec 8 at IND 39% 113–117 L 105–116 ✓correct −7
Dec 6 at MIA 19% 111–124 W 127–111 ✗missed +29
Dec 3 at HOU 11% 106–124 L 95–121 ✓correct −8
Nov 30 vs MEM 42% 114–117 L 107–115 ✓correct −5
Nov 28 at UTA 47% 119–120 L 119–128 ✓correct −8
Nov 26 vs PHX 34% 114–120 L 100–112 ✓correct −6
Nov 24 vs MIN 22% 114–125 W 117–112 ✗missed +16
Nov 22 at DEN 13% 111–128 W 128–123 ✗missed +22
Nov 20 at MEM 53% 116–115 L 96–137 ✗missed −42
Nov 19 at OKC 7% 106–129 L 99–113 ✓correct +9
Nov 16 at SAS 31% 114–121 L 110–123 ✓correct −6
Nov 14 at MIN 17% 113–127 L 110–124 ✓correct ±0
Nov 12 vs ATL 31% 113–120 L 100–133 ✓correct −26
Nov 11 vs DEN 29% 113–121 L 108–122 ✓correct −6
Nov 9 vs MIN 47% 118–119 L 117–144 ✓correct −26
Nov 7 vs OKC 36% 113–118 L 101–132 ✓correct −26
Nov 5 vs GSW 42% 112–115 W 121–116 ✗missed +8
Nov 3 at DEN 39% 112–116 L 124–130 ✓correct −2
Nov 1 at MIL 36% 113–118 W 135–133 ✗missed +7
Oct 29 at CHI 31% 113–120 L 113–126 ✓correct −6
Oct 28 at OKC 29% 108–116 L 101–107 ✓correct +2
Oct 26 vs LAL 64% 112–107 L 120–127 ✗missed −12
Oct 24 vs UTA 64% 118–113 W 105–104 ✓correct −4
Oct 22 at PHX 58% 116–113 L 116–120 ✗missed −7
Apr 13 vs PHX 71% 116–108 W 109–98 ✓correct +3
Apr 11 vs LAC 36% 109–115 L 100–101 ✓correct +5
Apr 9 vs DEN 49% 114–115 L 116–124 ✓correct −7
Apr 7 at DET 33% 111–117 W 127–117 ✗missed +16
Apr 6 at CLE 31% 112–119 W 120–113 ✗missed +14
Apr 4 at CHA 66% 115–108 W 125–102 ✓correct +16
Apr 2 at WAS 66% 121–114 L 111–116 ✗missed −12
Mar 31 at IND 36% 112–117 L 109–111 ✓correct +3
Mar 29 at ORL 51% 111–110 L 91–121 ✗missed −31
Mar 27 vs POR 49% 112–113 W 128–107 ✗missed +22
Mar 25 vs OKC 29% 110–119 L 105–121 ✓correct −7
Mar 24 vs BOS 27% 109–119 L 95–113 ✓correct −8
Mar 22 vs MIL 46% 114–116 L 108–114 ✓correct −4
Mar 20 vs CHI 67% 121–115 L 116–128 ✗missed −18
Mar 19 vs CLE 34% 111–118 W 123–119 ✗missed +11
Mar 17 vs MEM 62% 118–114 W 132–122 ✓correct +6
Mar 14 at PHX 59% 117–113 L 106–122 ✗missed −20
Mar 13 at GSW 46% 113–114 L 104–130 ✓correct −25
Mar 10 vs NYK 67% 113–107 L 104–133 ✗missed −35
Mar 9 at LAC 41% 107–110 L 110–111 ✓correct +2
Mar 7 vs SAS 73% 122–113 W 127–109 ✓correct +9
Mar 5 at DEN 33% 112–118 L 110–116 ✓correct ±0
Mar 3 at DAL 51% 115–114 W 122–98 ✓correct +23
Mar 1 at HOU 38% 110–114 W 113–103 ✗missed +14
Feb 26 at UTA 64% 121–115 W 118–101 ✓correct +11
Feb 24 vs CHA 73% 117–108 W 130–88 ✓correct +33
Feb 21 vs GSW 64% 118–113 L 108–132 ✗missed −29
Feb 13 at NOP 75% 125–114 L 133–140 ✗missed −18
Feb 12 at NOP 71% 123–114 W 119–111 ✓correct −1
Feb 10 at DAL 38% 118–122 W 129–128 ✗missed +5
Feb 8 vs NOP 73% 123–114 W 123–118 ✓correct −4
Feb 6 at POR 46% 114–115 L 102–108 ✓correct −5
Feb 5 vs ORL 69% 118–111 L 111–130 ✗missed −26
Feb 3 at MIN 33% 114–120 W 116–114 ✗missed +8
Feb 1 at OKC 21% 112–124 L 110–144 ✓correct −22
Jan 29 at PHI 61% 118–113 L 104–117 ✗missed −18
Jan 27 at BKN 69% 118–110 W 110–96 ✓correct +6
Jan 25 at NYK 41% 115–118 L 120–143 ✓correct −20
Jan 23 at DEN 33% 112–118 L 123–132 ✓correct −3
Jan 22 vs GSW 69% 117–110 W 123–117 ✓correct −1
Jan 19 vs WAS 88% 128–110 W 123–100 ✓correct +5
Jan 16 vs HOU 59% 114–111 W 132–127 ✓correct +2
Jan 14 at MIL 46% 114–115 L 115–130 ✓correct −14
Jan 12 at CHI 56% 117–114 W 124–119 ✓correct +2
Jan 10 at BOS 29% 107–115 W 114–97 ✗missed +25
Jan 6 vs MIA 64% 116–111 W 123–118 ✓correct ±0
Jan 5 at GSW 41% 114–117 W 129–99 ✗missed +33
Jan 3 vs MEM 54% 117–116 W 138–133 ✓correct +4
Jan 1 vs PHI 71% 117–109 W 113–107 ✓correct −2
Dec 30 vs DAL 64% 119–114 W 110–100 ✓correct +5
Dec 28 at LAL 41% 113–116 L 122–132 ✓correct −7
Dec 26 vs DET 69% 122–115 L 113–114 ✗missed −8
Dec 22 vs IND 64% 120–115 L 95–122 ✗missed −32
Dec 21 vs LAL 71% 118–110 L 99–103 ✗missed −12
Dec 19 vs LAL 67% 118–112 L 100–113 ✗missed −19
Dec 16 vs DEN 54% 119–118 L 129–130 ✗missed −2
Dec 12 at NOP 71% 122–113 W 111–109 ✓correct −7
Dec 8 vs UTA 77% 120–109 W 141–97 ✓correct +33
Dec 6 at SAS 54% 114–112 W 140–113 ✓correct +25
Dec 5 at MEM 29% 113–121 L 110–115 ✓correct +3
Dec 3 vs HOU 49% 115–116 W 120–111 ✗missed +10
Dec 1 vs SAS 44% 110–113 L 125–127 ✓correct +1
Nov 29 at POR 54% 113–111 L 106–115 ✗missed −11
Nov 27 at MIN 31% 106–113 W 115–104 ✗missed +18
Nov 25 vs OKC 49% 110–111 L 109–130 ✓correct −20
Nov 24 vs BKN 71% 114–106 L 103–108 ✗missed −13
Nov 22 at LAC 46% 108–109 L 88–104 ✓correct −15
Nov 18 vs ATL 59% 121–118 L 108–109 ✗missed −4
Nov 16 vs UTA 62% 115–111 W 121–117 ✓correct ±0
Nov 15 vs MIN 62% 112–108 L 126–130 ✗missed −8
Nov 13 vs PHX 67% 115–109 W 127–104 ✓correct +17
Nov 11 at SAS 59% 112–108 L 96–116 ✗missed −24
Nov 10 at PHX 43% 112–114 W 127–118 ✗missed +11
Nov 8 vs LAC 64% 113–108 L 98–107 ✗missed −14
Nov 6 vs TOR 81% 125–112 W 122–107 ✓correct +2
Nov 4 at MIA 46% 109–110 W 111–110 ✗missed +2
Nov 2 at TOR 69% 119–111 L 128–131 ✗missed −11
Nov 1 at ATL 64% 119–113 W 123–115 ✓correct +2
Oct 29 at UTA 64% 117–111 W 113–96 ✓correct +11
Oct 28 vs POR 75% 116–106 W 111–98 ✓correct +3
Oct 26 at LAL 41% 109–112 L 127–131 ✓correct −1
Oct 24 vs MIN 62% 111–107 L 115–117 ✗missed −6
Apr 14 vs POR 82% 115–99 W 121–82 ✓correct +23
Apr 12 vs PHX 57% 110–109 L 107–108 ✗missed −2
Apr 11 vs NOP 57% 108–107 L 123–135 ✗missed −13
Apr 9 at OKC 35% 108–113 L 105–112 ✓correct −2
Apr 7 at BKN 57% 113–107 W 107–77 ✓correct +24
Apr 5 at BOS 47% 109–108 L 100–101 ✗missed −2
Apr 4 at NYK 34% 104–110 L 109–120 ✓correct −5
Apr 2 vs LAC 53% 108–109 W 109–95 ✗missed +15
Mar 31 vs UTA 75% 115–104 W 127–106 ✓correct +10
Mar 29 vs DAL 57% 113–112 L 103–107 ✗missed −5
Mar 26 vs DAL 63% 114–110 L 96–132 ✗missed −40
Mar 25 vs PHI 65% 112–107 W 108–96 ✓correct +7
Mar 23 at ORL 39% 108–111 W 109–107 ✗missed +5
Mar 21 at WAS 63% 122–113 L 102–109 ✗missed −16
Mar 20 at TOR 75% 122–106 W 123–89 ✓correct +18
Mar 18 vs MEM 78% 115–102 W 121–111 ✓correct −3
Mar 16 vs NYK 59% 110–108 L 91–98 ✗missed −9
Mar 13 vs LAL 61% 118–115 W 120–107 ✓correct +10
Mar 12 vs MIL 51% 113–115 W 129–94 ✗missed +37
Mar 10 vs HOU 61% 117–114 L 104–112 ✗missed −11
Mar 7 vs SAS 76% 122–110 W 131–129 ✓correct −10
Mar 6 at LAL 43% 117–118 W 130–120 ✗missed +11
Mar 4 vs CHI 57% 113–112 L 109–113 ✗missed −5
Mar 1 at MIN 37% 113–117 W 124–120 ✗missed +8
Feb 28 at DEN 34% 111–117 L 96–117 ✓correct −15
Feb 26 vs MIA 72% 122–113 L 110–121 ✗missed −20
Feb 25 at LAC 30% 113–121 W 123–107 ✗missed +24
Feb 22 vs SAS 73% 121–111 W 127–122 ✓correct −5
Feb 14 at DEN 34% 110–116 W 102–98 ✗missed +10
Feb 13 at PHX 34% 114–120 L 125–130 ✓correct +1
Feb 11 at OKC 32% 112–119 L 113–127 ✓correct −7
Feb 9 vs DEN 51% 114–116 W 135–106 ✗missed +31
Feb 7 vs DET 82% 127–111 L 120–133 ✗missed −29
Feb 5 at CLE 34% 112–118 L 110–136 ✓correct −20
Feb 3 at CHI 43% 116–117 W 123–115 ✗missed +9
Feb 2 at IND 41% 116–118 W 133–122 ✗missed +13
Jan 31 at MIA 55% 115–110 L 106–115 ✗missed −14
Jan 29 at MEM 59% 116–109 W 103–94 ✓correct +2
Jan 27 at DAL 53% 122–118 W 120–115 ✓correct +1
Jan 25 at GSW 53% 122–118 W 134–133 ✓correct −3
Jan 22 vs ATL 72% 124–115 W 122–107 ✓correct +6
Jan 18 vs IND 57% 118–117 L 121–126 ✗missed −6
Jan 16 at PHX 43% 116–117 L 117–119 ✓correct −1
Jan 14 at MIL 39% 115–118 L 142–143 ✓correct +2
Jan 12 at PHI 41% 112–114 L 93–112 ✓correct −17
Jan 10 at CHA 59% 117–110 W 123–98 ✓correct +18
Jan 9 at DET 55% 121–116 W 131–110 ✓correct +16
Jan 7 vs NOP 59% 116–114 L 100–133 ✗missed −35
Jan 5 vs TOR 61% 118–115 W 135–130 ✓correct +2
Jan 3 vs ORL 61% 118–115 W 138–135 ✓correct ±0
Jan 2 vs CHA 81% 123–108 L 104–111 ✗missed −22
Dec 31 at MEM 51% 117–114 W 123–92 ✓correct +28
Dec 29 at ATL 49% 122–120 W 117–110 ✓correct +5
Dec 26 at POR 53% 119–115 L 113–130 ✗missed −21
Dec 23 vs MIN 59% 118–116 L 98–110 ✗missed −14
Dec 22 vs PHX 61% 120–117 W 120–105 ✓correct +12
Dec 20 vs BOS 63% 118–114 L 119–144 ✗missed −29
Dec 18 vs WAS 70% 121–113 W 143–131 ✓correct +4
Dec 16 vs UTA 76% 122–110 W 125–104 ✓correct +9
Dec 14 vs OKC 59% 116–114 W 128–123 ✓correct +3
Dec 12 at LAC 34% 112–118 L 99–119 ✓correct −14
Dec 11 vs BKN 61% 117–114 W 131–118 ✓correct +10
Dec 8 at PHX 49% 117–115 W 114–106 ✓correct +6
Dec 4 vs NOP 61% 119–116 L 117–127 ✗missed −13
Dec 2 vs DEN 57% 116–115 W 123–117 ✓correct +5
Nov 29 vs LAC 65% 117–112 L 117–131 ✗missed −19
Nov 28 vs GSW 61% 118–115 W 124–123 ✓correct −2
Nov 24 at MIN 32% 110–117 W 124–111 ✗missed +20
Nov 22 at NOP 43% 116–117 L 112–117 ✓correct −4
Nov 20 at NOP 49% 116–114 L 93–129 ✗missed −38
Nov 19 at DAL 37% 116–120 W 129–113 ✗missed +20
Nov 17 at SAS 59% 120–113 W 129–120 ✓correct +2
Nov 15 at LAL 41% 112–114 W 125–110 ✗missed +17
Nov 13 vs CLE 57% 112–111 W 132–120 ✓correct +11
Nov 10 vs OKC 53% 114–115 W 105–98 ✗missed +8
Nov 8 vs POR 67% 117–111 W 121–118 ✓correct −3
Nov 6 at HOU 43% 113–114 L 97–122 ✓correct −24
Nov 4 at HOU 49% 117–115 L 89–107 ✗missed −20
Nov 1 at GSW 27% 109–119 L 101–102 ✓correct +9
Oct 29 vs LAL 57% 116–115 W 132–127 ✓correct +4
Oct 27 vs GSW 59% 116–114 L 114–122 ✗missed −10
Oct 25 at UTA 55% 118–113 W 130–114 ✓correct +11
Apr 30 PO vs GSW 53% 111–110 L 100–120 ✗missed −21
Apr 28 PO at GSW 28% 109–118 W 118–99 ✗missed +28
Apr 26 PO vs GSW 53% 115–114 L 116–123 ✗missed −8
Apr 23 PO at GSW 30% 108–116 L 125–126 ✓correct +7
Apr 20 PO at GSW 28% 108–117 L 97–114 ✓correct −8
Apr 17 PO vs GSW 63% 116–111 W 114–106 ✓correct +3
Apr 15 PO vs GSW 70% 121–113 W 126–123 ✓correct −5
Apr 9 at DEN 65% 117–111 L 95–109 ✗missed −20
Apr 7 vs GSW 58% 118–115 L 97–119 ✗missed −25
Apr 5 at DAL 47% 119–120 L 119–123 ✓correct −3
Apr 4 at NOP 45% 115–117 W 121–103 ✗missed +20
Apr 2 vs SAS 90% 124–103 L 134–142 ✗missed −29
Mar 31 at POR 80% 127–114 W 138–114 ✓correct +11
Mar 29 at POR 76% 127–116 W 120–80 ✓correct +29
Mar 27 vs MIN 60% 120–116 L 115–119 ✗missed −8
Mar 25 vs UTA 68% 123–116 W 121–113 ✓correct +1
Mar 24 vs PHX 60% 122–118 W 135–127 ✓correct +4
Mar 21 vs BOS 37% 111–116 L 109–132 ✓correct −18
Mar 20 at UTA 68% 126–119 L 120–128 ✗missed −15
Mar 18 at WAS 47% 114–115 W 132–118 ✗missed +15
Mar 16 at BKN 47% 118–119 W 101–96 ✗missed +6
Mar 15 at CHI 40% 115–119 W 117–114 ✗missed +7
Mar 13 vs MIL 47% 118–119 L 124–133 ✓correct −8
Mar 11 at PHX 30% 113–121 W 128–119 ✗missed +17
Mar 9 vs NYK 45% 117–119 W 122–117 ✗missed +7
Mar 6 vs NOP 45% 113–115 W 123–108 ✗missed +17
Mar 4 vs MIN 53% 117–116 L 134–138 ✗missed −5
Mar 3 vs LAC 60% 120–116 W 128–127 ✓correct −3
Feb 28 at OKC 42% 117–120 W 123–117 ✗missed +9
Feb 26 at OKC 37% 117–122 W 124–115 ✗missed +14
Feb 24 at LAC 45% 114–116 W 176–175 ✗missed +3
Feb 23 vs POR 68% 126–119 W 133–116 ✓correct +10
Feb 14 at PHX 45% 113–115 L 109–120 ✓correct −9
Feb 11 vs DAL 47% 113–114 W 133–128 ✗missed +6
Feb 10 vs DAL 65% 114–108 L 114–122 ✗missed −14
Feb 8 at HOU 60% 121–117 W 130–128 ✓correct −2
Feb 6 at HOU 60% 121–117 W 140–120 ✓correct +16
Feb 5 at NOP 72% 118–109 L 104–136 ✗missed −41
Feb 3 at IND 60% 123–119 L 104–107 ✗missed −7
Feb 1 at SAS 60% 123–119 W 119–109 ✓correct +6
Jan 30 at MIN 40% 117–121 W 118–111 ✗missed +11
Jan 28 at MIN 45% 117–119 L 110–117 ✓correct −5
Jan 25 vs TOR 58% 116–113 L 95–113 ✗missed −21
Jan 23 vs MEM 58% 119–116 W 133–100 ✓correct +30
Jan 21 vs PHI 45% 115–117 L 127–129 ✓correct ±0
Jan 20 vs OKC 60% 119–115 W 118–113 ✓correct +1
Jan 18 at LAL 47% 119–120 W 116–111 ✗missed +6
Jan 15 at SAS 60% 124–120 W 132–119 ✓correct +9
Jan 13 vs HOU 83% 123–108 W 139–114 ✓correct +10
Jan 11 vs HOU 80% 123–110 W 135–115 ✓correct +7
Jan 9 vs ORL 63% 122–117 W 136–111 ✓correct +20
Jan 7 vs LAL 53% 119–118 L 134–136 ✗missed −3
Jan 4 vs ATL 55% 119–117 L 117–120 ✗missed −5
Jan 3 at UTA 47% 116–117 W 117–115 ✗missed +3
Jan 1 at MEM 42% 112–115 L 108–118 ✓correct −7
Dec 30 vs UTA 58% 117–114 W 126–125 ✓correct −2
Dec 28 vs DEN 37% 114–119 W 127–126 ✗missed +6
Dec 27 vs DEN 45% 116–118 L 106–113 ✓correct −5
Dec 23 vs WAS 65% 119–113 L 111–125 ✗missed −20
Dec 21 vs LAL 65% 119–113 W 134–120 ✓correct +8
Dec 19 vs CHA 83% 121–106 L 119–125 ✗missed −21
Dec 16 at DET 70% 120–112 W 122–113 ✓correct +1
Dec 14 at TOR 42% 111–114 W 124–123 ✗missed +4
Dec 13 at PHI 45% 111–113 L 103–123 ✓correct −18
Dec 11 at NYK 45% 111–113 L 99–112 ✓correct −11
Dec 9 at CLE 37% 106–111 W 106–95 ✗missed +16
Dec 7 at MIL 35% 111–117 L 113–126 ✓correct −7
Dec 4 vs CHI 65% 119–113 W 110–101 ✓correct +3
Dec 3 at LAC 47% 116–117 W 123–96 ✗missed +28
Nov 30 vs IND 53% 119–118 W 137–114 ✓correct +22
Nov 28 vs PHX 45% 117–119 L 117–122 ✓correct −3
Nov 25 at BOS 35% 114–120 L 104–122 ✓correct −12
Nov 23 at ATL 32% 113–120 L 106–115 ✓correct −2
Nov 22 at MEM 28% 111–120 W 113–109 ✗missed +13
Nov 20 vs DET 83% 122–107 W 137–129 ✓correct −7
Nov 17 vs SAS 81% 121–107 W 130–112 ✓correct +4
Nov 15 vs BKN 40% 109–113 W 153–121 ✗missed +36
Nov 13 vs GSW 37% 114–119 W 122–115 ✗missed +12
Nov 11 at LAL 63% 113–108 W 120–114 ✓correct +1
Nov 9 vs CLE 26% 105–115 W 127–120 ✗missed +17
Nov 7 at GSW 42% 111–114 L 113–116 ✓correct ±0
Nov 5 at ORL 47% 113–114 W 126–123 ✗missed +4
Nov 2 at MIA 30% 106–114 L 107–110 ✓correct +5
Oct 31 at CHA 24% 108–119 W 115–108 ✗missed +18
Oct 29 vs MIA 35% 106–112 W 119–113 ✗missed +12
Oct 27 vs MEM 32% 111–118 L 110–125 ✓correct −8
Oct 23 at GSW 28% 106–115 L 125–130 ✓correct +4
Oct 22 vs LAC 35% 110–116 L 109–111 ✓correct +4
Oct 19 vs POR 81% 116–102 L 108–115 ✗missed −21

Surprise games

All SAC surprises

Across every graded season. The percentage is the pregame chance the forecast gave the team that won.

Most unexpected SAC wins

  1. 13%SAC beat DEN128–123Nov 22, 2025-26 · forecast DEN128–111 · missed margin by 22
  2. 14%SAC beat LAC118–109Mar 14, 2025-26 · forecast LAC125–109 · missed margin by 25
  3. 19%SAC beat MIA127–111Dec 6, 2025-26 · forecast MIA124–111 · missed margin by 29
  4. 22%SAC beat TOR123–115Apr 1, 2025-26 · forecast TOR119–108 · missed margin by 19
  5. 22%SAC beat HOU111–98Jan 11, 2025-26 · forecast HOU117–106 · missed margin by 24

Most unexpected SAC losses

  1. 10%SAS beat SAC142–134Apr 2, 2022-23 · forecast SAC124–103 · missed margin by 29
  2. 17%CHA beat SAC125–119Dec 19, 2022-23 · forecast SAC121–106 · missed margin by 21
  3. 18%DET beat SAC133–120Feb 7, 2023-24 · forecast SAC127–111 · missed margin by 29
  4. 19%POR beat SAC115–108Oct 19, 2022-23 · forecast SAC116–102 · missed margin by 21
  5. 19%CHA beat SAC111–104Jan 2, 2023-24 · forecast SAC123–108 · missed margin by 22

Largest margin misses

  1. 47%MEM beat SAC137–96Nov 20, 2025-26 · forecast SAC116–115 · missed margin by 42
  2. 28%NOP beat SAC136–104Feb 5, 2022-23 · forecast SAC118–109 · missed margin by 41
  3. 37%DAL beat SAC132–96Mar 26, 2023-24 · forecast SAC114–110 · missed margin by 40
  4. 51%NOP beat SAC129–93Nov 20, 2023-24 · forecast SAC116–114 · missed margin by 38
  5. 51%SAC beat MIL129–94Mar 12, 2023-24 · forecast MIL115–113 · missed margin by 37

Recent results the forecast got wrong

  1. 26%SAC beat DAL115–100Nov 2, 2026-27 · forecast DAL123–114 · missed margin by 24
  2. 44%MEM beat SAC123–112Oct 25, 2026-27 · forecast SAC119–117 · missed margin by 13
  3. 42%SAC beat GSW124–118Apr 10, 2025-26 · forecast GSW117–114 · missed margin by 9
  4. 44%SAC beat NOP117–113Apr 3, 2025-26 · forecast NOP115–113 · missed margin by 6
  5. 22%SAC beat TOR123–115Apr 1, 2025-26 · forecast TOR119–108 · missed margin by 19

Definitions

Expected wins
The sum of the team's pregame win probabilities over the games in the sample (home: the stored home win probability; road: one minus it).
Wins vs expectation
Actual wins minus expected wins. It describes results relative to the forecasts, not why they differed.
Margin error
The team's actual margin minus its forecast margin, in points. Positive means the team did better than forecast.
Error variability
The sample standard deviation of margin errors. Higher means the forecasts for this team's games were less consistent.
Winner picked
The share of the team's games in which the forecast winner won, whichever team that was. Teams play different mixes of close and lopsided games, so this alone is not a fair measure of how hard a team is to forecast.
Average margin miss
The mean absolute margin error. This is the headline measure of how hard a team's games were for this model to forecast.
Average margin error
The mean signed margin error. Consistently positive means the model underrated the team in this sample; negative, overrated.
Brier score
The mean squared difference between the team's pregame win probability and the result (1 for a win, 0 for a loss). It rewards confident correct forecasts and penalises confident wrong ones.
Intervals and samples
Ranges are 90% bootstrap intervals (1,000 resamples of the team's games). Under 20 games no ranking is shown; 20 to 59 games is exploratory; 60 or more is roughly a full season.

More on how forecasts are made and tested: Methodology.