← All teams

Western Conference · 2026-27

New Orleans Pelicans NOP

4–6
2026-27 record
1433
Elo rating
with the forecast of Nov 8
113.5
Offensive rating
last 10 games
112.9
Defensive rating
last 10, lower is better
103.1
Pace
possessions per game
226 of 342 forecasts for NOP games picked the winner.

Hover the ball to see a season.

Every graded NOP game, one dot each, oldest at the center. 226 of 342 forecasts picked the winner (colored dots).

Elo rating, recent games

NOP pregame Elo over its last 82 games with a forecast, from 1335 to 1433 1250130013501400145015001550 new season 1433 Nov 2025 Nov 2026
Pregame Elo stored with each of NOP's last 82 forecasts. Dashed: 1500, the long-run average.

Upcoming

Schedule
Nov 9 10:00 PM ET
NOP New Orleans Pelicans 4–6 –
@GSW Golden State Warriors (home) 7–3 –
Forecast coming Details
Nov 11 8:00 PM ET
BKN Brooklyn Nets 2–8 –
@NOP New Orleans Pelicans (home) 4–6 –
Forecast coming Details
Nov 13 8:00 PM ET
MEM Memphis Grizzlies 6–3 –
@NOP New Orleans Pelicans (home) 4–6 –
Forecast coming Details
Nov 14 7:00 PM ET
DEN Denver Nuggets 5–3 –
@NOP New Orleans Pelicans (home) 4–6 –
Forecast coming Details

Recent results

Archive
Nov 8 Final
NOP New Orleans Pelicans 115 123
@LAC Los Angeles Clippers (home) 119 139
NOP 39% 61% LAC

Why: Elo 1.7 → LAC · Pace 1.2 → LAC

✓ Picked LAC Details
Nov 6 Final
MIN Minnesota Timberwolves 122 115
@NOP New Orleans Pelicans (home) 115 109
MIN 70% 30% NOP
✓ Picked MIN Details
Nov 4 Final
UTA Utah Jazz 114 113
@NOP New Orleans Pelicans (home) 122 120
UTA 27% 73% NOP
✓ Picked NOP Details
Nov 2 Final
NOP New Orleans Pelicans 118 135
@MEM Memphis Grizzlies (home) 120 134
NOP 44% 56% MEM

Why: Injuries 1.5 → MEM · Pace 1.4 → NOP

✗ Picked MEM Details
Oct 31 Final
ATL Atlanta Hawks 123 99
@NOP New Orleans Pelicans (home) 118 121
ATL 64% 36% NOP

Why: Elo 5.0 → ATL · Injuries 1.8 → ATL

✗ Picked ATL Details

Predictability

How closely the forecasts tracked NOP games. A team can be hard for this model to forecast whether it is good or bad: misses come from the model's limits, roster changes, missing information and ordinary game-to-game variation. Compare all 30 teams

2026-27 (in progress)

Small sample: 10 games. These figures are a running log, not a measurement, and no ranking is shown.

7.7 pts
average margin miss
90% interval 4.3 to 11.7
+1.3
average margin error
+ = better than forecast; 90% interval -4.0 to 7.0
11.2 pts
error variability
std. deviation; league margin miss 11.7
60%
winner picked
10 games involving NOP
4 / 4.6
actual / expected wins
gap −0.6
0.212
Brier score
0.25 = coin flip; lower is better

Expected and actual wins

NOP: cumulative expected wins from pregame win probabilities against actual wins 024 4 actual 4.6 exp. 1510 Game number in sample
Solid: actual wins. Dashed: expected wins, the running sum of NOP's pregame win probability in each game.

Margin error, game by game

NOP: margin forecast error in each game, actual minus predicted -30-150+15+30 Better than forecast Worse than forecast Games in date order
Each bar is one game: NOP's actual margin minus its predicted margin, in points. Positive bars sit above the line and negative bars below it, so direction does not depend on color.

How the errors are spread

NOP: distribution of 10 margin errors; mean +1.3 points 012 -40 to -36 pts: 0 games -36 to -32 pts: 0 games -32 to -28 pts: 0 games -28 to -24 pts: 0 games -24 to -20 pts: 0 games -20 to -16 pts: 0 games -16 to -12 pts: 0 games -12 to -8 pts: 2 games -8 to -4 pts: 1 games -4 to 0 pts: 2 games 0 to 4 pts: 2 games 4 to 8 pts: 1 games 8 to 12 pts: 1 games 12 to 16 pts: 0 games 16 to 20 pts: 0 games 20 to 24 pts: 0 games 24 to 28 pts: 1 games 28 to 32 pts: 0 games 32 to 36 pts: 0 games 36 to 40 pts: 0 games mean +1.3 -40-200+20+40 worse than forecast better than forecast
Each bar counts games whose margin error fell in a 4-point range (errors beyond ±40 are in the end bars). Dashed line: the average error.

NOP against the league

Average margin miss by team, 2026-27, smallest to largest; NOP is 2 of 30 3579111315171921232527 median 11.7 UTA: 6.70 points over 10 games, 90% interval 4.4–9.2 UTA 6.7 n=10 NOP: 7.70 points over 10 games, 90% interval 4.3–11.7 NOP 7.7 n=10 CLE: 8.50 points over 10 games, 90% interval 4.8–12.8 CLE 8.5 n=10 SAS: 8.50 points over 10 games, 90% interval 6.6–10.4 SAS 8.5 n=10 PHI: 8.82 points over 11 games, 90% interval 5.73–12.36 PHI 8.8 n=11 MIL: 9.00 points over 10 games, 90% interval 5.1–13.4 MIL 9.0 n=10 LAL: 9.64 points over 11 games, 90% interval 6.27–13 LAL 9.6 n=11 PHX: 9.88 points over 8 games, 90% interval 4.12–18.25 PHX 9.9 n=8 IND: 10.20 points over 10 games, 90% interval 6.8–14 IND 10.2 n=10 LAC: 11.33 points over 9 games, 90% interval 7.33–15.56 LAC 11.3 n=9 NYK: 11.33 points over 9 games, 90% interval 7.89–14.67 NYK 11.3 n=9 SAC: 11.50 points over 10 games, 90% interval 6.9–16.2 SAC 11.5 n=10 WAS: 11.50 points over 10 games, 90% interval 6.7–16.6 WAS 11.5 n=10 DET: 11.56 points over 9 games, 90% interval 8.56–15.56 DET 11.6 n=9 BOS: 11.70 points over 10 games, 90% interval 7.4–16.7 BOS 11.7 n=10 DEN: 11.75 points over 8 games, 90% interval 6.88–16.88 DEN 11.8 n=8 BKN: 11.90 points over 10 games, 90% interval 7.6–16.7 BKN 11.9 n=10 CHI: 12.00 points over 9 games, 90% interval 6.44–18.11 CHI 12.0 n=9 MIA: 12.00 points over 10 games, 90% interval 7.8–16 MIA 12.0 n=10 GSW: 12.50 points over 10 games, 90% interval 8.4–17.4 GSW 12.5 n=10 MIN: 12.55 points over 11 games, 90% interval 7.36–18.18 MIN 12.6 n=11 HOU: 13.10 points over 10 games, 90% interval 8.9–17.9 HOU 13.1 n=10 ATL: 13.55 points over 11 games, 90% interval 6.64–21.55 ATL 13.6 n=11 ORL: 13.67 points over 9 games, 90% interval 9.67–18.22 ORL 13.7 n=9 OKC: 14.20 points over 10 games, 90% interval 8.3–20.5 OKC 14.2 n=10 DAL: 14.70 points over 10 games, 90% interval 9.7–19.8 DAL 14.7 n=10 POR: 15.11 points over 9 games, 90% interval 8.89–22 POR 15.1 n=9 TOR: 15.33 points over 9 games, 90% interval 9.78–21.33 TOR 15.3 n=9 MEM: 15.56 points over 9 games, 90% interval 10.22–20.78 MEM 15.6 n=9 CHA: 17.30 points over 10 games, 90% interval 9.3–26.3 CHA 17.3 n=10 average margin miss, points (lower = easier to forecast)
Dots: average absolute margin error per team. Lines: 90% bootstrap intervals; overlapping lines mean the difference between those teams is not clear in this sample. Hollow dots: fewer than 20 games.
All 10 games in this sample
DateOpponentNOP win prob.ProjectedFinalPickMargin error
Nov 8 at LAC 39% 115–119 L 123–139 ✓correct −12
Nov 6 vs MIN 30% 115–122 L 109–115 ✓correct +1
Nov 4 vs UTA 73% 122–114 W 120–113 ✓correct −1
Nov 2 at MEM 44% 118–120 W 135–134 ✗missed +3
Oct 31 vs ATL 36% 118–123 W 121–99 ✗missed +27
Oct 29 vs SAC 56% 122–120 W 132–120 ✓correct +10
Oct 28 vs DEN 41% 118–121 L 91–104 ✓correct −10
Oct 24 at DEN 24% 113–123 L 135–141 ✓correct +4
Oct 23 at UTA 56% 123–121 L 119–120 ✗missed −3
Oct 21 vs IND 59% 124–121 L 120–123 ✗missed −6

2025-26

9.6 pts
average margin miss
90% interval 8.5 to 10.8; 1st smallest of 30
+1.4
average margin error
+ = better than forecast; 90% interval -0.8 to 3.4
11.7 pts
error variability
std. deviation; league margin miss 11.4
71%
winner picked
82 games involving NOP
26 / 28.9
actual / expected wins
gap −3.0
0.173
Brier score
0.25 = coin flip; lower is better

Expected and actual wins

NOP: cumulative expected wins from pregame win probabilities against actual wins 051015202530 26 actual 28.9 exp. 14182 Game number in sample
Solid: actual wins. Dashed: expected wins, the running sum of NOP's pregame win probability in each game.

Margin error, game by game

NOP: margin forecast error in each game, actual minus predicted -40-200+20+40 Better than forecast Worse than forecast Games in date order
Each bar is one game: NOP's actual margin minus its predicted margin, in points. Positive bars sit above the line and negative bars below it, so direction does not depend on color.

How the errors are spread

NOP: distribution of 82 margin errors; mean +1.4 points 0918 -40 to -36 pts: 0 games -36 to -32 pts: 1 games -32 to -28 pts: 0 games -28 to -24 pts: 0 games -24 to -20 pts: 1 games -20 to -16 pts: 3 games -16 to -12 pts: 5 games -12 to -8 pts: 6 games -8 to -4 pts: 11 games -4 to 0 pts: 7 games 0 to 4 pts: 8 games 4 to 8 pts: 18 games 8 to 12 pts: 6 games 12 to 16 pts: 6 games 16 to 20 pts: 4 games 20 to 24 pts: 5 games 24 to 28 pts: 0 games 28 to 32 pts: 1 games 32 to 36 pts: 0 games 36 to 40 pts: 0 games mean +1.4 -40-200+20+40 worse than forecast better than forecast
Each bar counts games whose margin error fell in a 4-point range (errors beyond ±40 are in the end bars). Dashed line: the average error.

NOP against the league

Average margin miss by team, 2025-26, smallest to largest; NOP is 1 of 30 79111315 median 11.5 NOP: 9.60 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.48–10.84 NOP 9.6 n=82 DAL: 9.67 points over 81 games, 90% interval 8.4–11.09 DAL 9.7 n=81 DET: 10.16 points over 95 games, 90% interval 8.67–11.82 DET 10.2 n=95 IND: 10.32 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.74–12.01 IND 10.3 n=82 SAS: 10.41 points over 103 games, 90% interval 9.12–11.82 SAS 10.4 n=103 GSW: 10.43 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.06–11.98 GSW 10.4 n=82 CLE: 10.56 points over 100 games, 90% interval 9.19–11.94 CLE 10.6 n=100 POR: 10.59 points over 87 games, 90% interval 9.22–12.23 POR 10.6 n=87 DEN: 10.67 points over 88 games, 90% interval 9.09–12.41 DEN 10.7 n=88 MEM: 10.72 points over 80 games, 90% interval 9.05–12.4 MEM 10.7 n=80 ORL: 10.76 points over 86 games, 90% interval 9.19–12.45 ORL 10.8 n=86 PHX: 10.87 points over 86 games, 90% interval 9.27–12.48 PHX 10.9 n=86 HOU: 10.93 points over 88 games, 90% interval 9.52–12.23 HOU 10.9 n=88 LAL: 11.25 points over 92 games, 90% interval 9.9–12.52 LAL 11.3 n=92 OKC: 11.48 points over 96 games, 90% interval 9.74–13.17 OKC 11.5 n=96 LAC: 11.50 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.93–13.07 LAC 11.5 n=82 CHI: 11.59 points over 82 games, 90% interval 10.02–13.22 CHI 11.6 n=82 SAC: 11.59 points over 82 games, 90% interval 10.06–13.29 SAC 11.6 n=82 PHI: 11.63 points over 93 games, 90% interval 10.02–13.37 PHI 11.6 n=93 BOS: 11.89 points over 89 games, 90% interval 10.47–13.35 BOS 11.9 n=89 WAS: 12.07 points over 82 games, 90% interval 10.65–13.57 WAS 12.1 n=82 UTA: 12.18 points over 82 games, 90% interval 10.29–14.11 UTA 12.2 n=82 BKN: 12.48 points over 82 games, 90% interval 10.94–14.34 BKN 12.5 n=82 MIN: 12.49 points over 94 games, 90% interval 11.06–14.07 MIN 12.5 n=94 ATL: 12.58 points over 88 games, 90% interval 10.92–14.49 ATL 12.6 n=88 TOR: 12.62 points over 89 games, 90% interval 11.03–14.24 TOR 12.6 n=89 MIA: 12.63 points over 82 games, 90% interval 11.02–14.3 MIA 12.6 n=82 MIL: 12.80 points over 82 games, 90% interval 11.06–14.59 MIL 12.8 n=82 CHA: 13.29 points over 82 games, 90% interval 11.57–15.17 CHA 13.3 n=82 NYK: 13.45 points over 99 games, 90% interval 11.64–15.37 NYK 13.4 n=99 average margin miss, points (lower = easier to forecast)
Dots: average absolute margin error per team. Lines: 90% bootstrap intervals; overlapping lines mean the difference between those teams is not clear in this sample. Hollow dots: fewer than 20 games.
All 82 games in this sample
DateOpponentNOP win prob.ProjectedFinalPickMargin error
Apr 12 at MIN 15% 107–122 L 126–132 ✓correct +9
Apr 10 at BOS 15% 105–120 L 118–144 ✓correct −11
Apr 7 vs UTA 59% 120–117 W 156–137 ✓correct +16
Apr 5 vs ORL 31% 111–118 L 108–112 ✓correct +3
Apr 3 at SAC 56% 115–113 L 113–117 ✗missed −6
Apr 2 at POR 31% 111–118 L 106–118 ✓correct −5
Mar 29 vs HOU 53% 115–114 L 102–134 ✗missed −33
Mar 27 at TOR 34% 113–119 L 106–119 ✓correct −7
Mar 26 at DET 31% 112–119 L 108–129 ✓correct −14
Mar 24 at NYK 34% 112–118 L 116–121 ✓correct +1
Mar 21 vs CLE 53% 116–115 L 106–111 ✗missed −6
Mar 19 vs LAC 47% 117–118 W 105–99 ✗missed +7
Mar 18 vs LAC 44% 118–120 W 124–109 ✗missed +17
Mar 16 vs DAL 67% 121–115 W 129–111 ✓correct +12
Mar 13 at HOU 34% 115–121 L 105–107 ✓correct +4
Mar 11 vs TOR 42% 115–118 W 122–111 ✗missed +14
Mar 8 vs WAS 71% 123–115 W 138–118 ✓correct +12
Mar 6 at PHX 53% 111–110 L 116–118 ✗missed −3
Mar 5 at SAC 66% 119–113 W 133–123 ✓correct +4
Mar 3 at LAL 34% 114–120 L 101–110 ✓correct −3
Mar 1 at LAC 39% 112–116 L 117–137 ✓correct −16
Feb 28 at UTA 64% 117–112 W 115–105 ✓correct +5
Feb 26 at UTA 64% 117–112 W 129–118 ✓correct +6
Feb 24 vs GSW 42% 112–115 W 113–109 ✗missed +7
Feb 21 vs PHI 47% 113–114 W 126–111 ✗missed +16
Feb 20 vs MIL 44% 109–111 L 118–139 ✓correct −19
Feb 11 vs MIA 44% 114–116 L 111–123 ✓correct −10
Feb 9 vs SAC 61% 115–111 W 120–94 ✓correct +22
Feb 6 at MIN 24% 112–122 W 119–115 ✗missed +14
Feb 4 at MIL 58% 112–109 L 137–141 ✗missed −7
Feb 2 at CHA 24% 108–118 L 95–102 ✓correct +3
Jan 31 at PHI 36% 112–117 L 114–124 ✓correct −5
Jan 30 vs MEM 56% 115–113 W 114–106 ✓correct +6
Jan 27 at OKC 14% 110–126 L 95–104 ✓correct +7
Jan 25 at SAS 20% 109–121 W 104–95 ✗missed +21
Jan 23 at MEM 34% 113–119 W 133–127 ✗missed +12
Jan 21 vs DET 22% 108–119 L 104–112 ✓correct +3
Jan 18 at HOU 24% 106–116 L 110–119 ✓correct +1
Jan 16 at IND 44% 116–118 L 119–127 ✓correct −6
Jan 14 vs BKN 47% 113–114 W 116–113 ✗missed +4
Jan 13 vs DEN 47% 114–115 L 116–122 ✓correct −5
Jan 11 at ORL 24% 112–122 L 118–128 ✓correct ±0
Jan 9 at WAS 44% 116–118 W 128–107 ✗missed +23
Jan 7 at ATL 36% 118–123 L 100–117 ✓correct −12
Jan 6 vs LAL 34% 115–121 L 103–111 ✓correct −2
Jan 4 at MIA 22% 112–123 L 106–125 ✓correct −8
Jan 2 vs POR 39% 116–120 L 109–122 ✓correct −9
Dec 31 at CHI 53% 119–118 L 118–134 ✗missed −17
Dec 29 vs NYK 22% 115–126 L 125–130 ✓correct +6
Dec 27 vs PHX 42% 115–118 L 114–123 ✓correct −6
Dec 26 vs PHX 42% 117–120 L 108–115 ✓correct −4
Dec 23 at CLE 26% 116–125 L 118–141 ✓correct −14
Dec 22 vs DAL 44% 118–120 W 119–113 ✗missed +8
Dec 20 vs IND 44% 115–117 W 128–109 ✗missed +21
Dec 18 vs HOU 20% 113–125 W 133–128 ✗missed +17
Dec 14 at CHI 44% 119–121 W 114–104 ✗missed +12
Dec 11 vs POR 31% 114–121 W 143–120 ✗missed +30
Dec 8 vs SAS 24% 115–125 L 132–135 ✓correct +7
Dec 6 at BKN 39% 112–116 L 101–119 ✓correct −14
Dec 4 vs MIN 19% 111–124 L 116–125 ✓correct +4
Dec 2 vs MIN 15% 109–124 L 142–149 ✓correct +8
Nov 30 at LAL 10% 107–126 L 121–133 ✓correct +7
Nov 29 at GSW 20% 109–121 L 96–104 ✓correct +4
Nov 26 vs MEM 39% 114–118 L 128–133 ✓correct −1
Nov 24 vs CHI 31% 116–123 W 143–130 ✗missed +20
Nov 22 vs ATL 22% 112–123 L 98–115 ✓correct −6
Nov 21 at DAL 34% 111–117 L 115–118 ✓correct +3
Nov 19 vs DEN 17% 112–126 L 118–125 ✓correct +7
Nov 17 vs OKC 15% 112–127 L 109–126 ✓correct −2
Nov 16 vs GSW 31% 110–117 L 106–124 ✓correct −11
Nov 14 vs LAL 24% 109–119 L 104–118 ✓correct −4
Nov 12 vs POR 19% 110–123 L 117–125 ✓correct +5
Nov 10 at PHX 22% 111–122 L 98–121 ✓correct −12
Nov 8 at SAS 14% 106–122 L 119–126 ✓correct +9
Nov 5 at DAL 29% 111–119 W 101–99 ✗missed +10
Nov 4 vs CHA 47% 115–116 W 116–112 ✗missed +5
Nov 2 at OKC 15% 104–119 L 106–137 ✓correct −16
Oct 31 at LAC 19% 103–116 L 124–126 ✓correct +11
Oct 29 at DEN 15% 108–123 L 88–122 ✓correct −19
Oct 27 vs BOS 27% 107–116 L 90–122 ✓correct −23
Oct 24 vs SAS 34% 114–120 L 116–120 ✓correct +2
Oct 22 at MEM 20% 109–121 L 122–128 ✓correct +6

2024-25

Across 82 graded games, NOP finished an average of 2.9 points worse than the forecast margin (90% interval -5.1 to -0.5).

10.2 pts
average margin miss
90% interval 8.6 to 11.8; 8th smallest of 30
−2.9
average margin error
+ = better than forecast; 90% interval -5.1 to -0.5
13.3 pts
error variability
std. deviation; league margin miss 11.0
74%
winner picked
82 games involving NOP
21 / 28.6
actual / expected wins
gap −7.6
0.164
Brier score
0.25 = coin flip; lower is better

Expected and actual wins

NOP: cumulative expected wins from pregame win probabilities against actual wins 051015202530 21 actual 28.6 exp. 14182 Game number in sample
Solid: actual wins. Dashed: expected wins, the running sum of NOP's pregame win probability in each game.

Margin error, game by game

NOP: margin forecast error in each game, actual minus predicted -40-200+20+40 Better than forecast Worse than forecast Games in date order
Each bar is one game: NOP's actual margin minus its predicted margin, in points. Positive bars sit above the line and negative bars below it, so direction does not depend on color.

How the errors are spread

NOP: distribution of 82 margin errors; mean -2.9 points 0815 -40 to -36 pts: 1 games -36 to -32 pts: 2 games -32 to -28 pts: 2 games -28 to -24 pts: 2 games -24 to -20 pts: 5 games -20 to -16 pts: 3 games -16 to -12 pts: 3 games -12 to -8 pts: 3 games -8 to -4 pts: 9 games -4 to 0 pts: 10 games 0 to 4 pts: 11 games 4 to 8 pts: 15 games 8 to 12 pts: 7 games 12 to 16 pts: 6 games 16 to 20 pts: 2 games 20 to 24 pts: 1 games 24 to 28 pts: 0 games 28 to 32 pts: 0 games 32 to 36 pts: 0 games 36 to 40 pts: 0 games mean -2.9 -40-200+20+40 worse than forecast better than forecast
Each bar counts games whose margin error fell in a 4-point range (errors beyond ±40 are in the end bars). Dashed line: the average error.

NOP against the league

Average margin miss by team, 2024-25, smallest to largest; NOP is 8 of 30 79111315 median 11.0 CHA: 9.26 points over 82 games, 90% interval 7.61–10.89 CHA 9.3 n=82 PHX: 9.49 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.11–10.93 PHX 9.5 n=82 HOU: 9.50 points over 88 games, 90% interval 8.27–10.78 HOU 9.5 n=88 ORL: 10.00 points over 87 games, 90% interval 8.64–11.37 ORL 10.0 n=87 DET: 10.03 points over 88 games, 90% interval 8.78–11.4 DET 10.0 n=88 PHI: 10.11 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.54–11.87 PHI 10.1 n=82 UTA: 10.12 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.48–12.02 UTA 10.1 n=82 NOP: 10.21 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.57–11.82 NOP 10.2 n=82 MIL: 10.27 points over 86 games, 90% interval 8.88–11.77 MIL 10.3 n=86 IND: 10.33 points over 103 games, 90% interval 9.13–11.63 IND 10.3 n=103 SAS: 10.68 points over 80 games, 90% interval 8.99–12.45 SAS 10.7 n=80 ATL: 10.74 points over 81 games, 90% interval 9.4–12.17 ATL 10.7 n=81 BKN: 10.80 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.33–12.39 BKN 10.8 n=82 WAS: 10.84 points over 81 games, 90% interval 9.32–12.23 WAS 10.8 n=81 MIN: 10.93 points over 97 games, 90% interval 9.53–12.36 MIN 10.9 n=97 DAL: 10.99 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.71–12.43 DAL 11.0 n=82 MIA: 11.04 points over 85 games, 90% interval 9.36–12.89 MIA 11.0 n=85 CLE: 11.07 points over 91 games, 90% interval 9.54–12.6 CLE 11.1 n=91 TOR: 11.09 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.52–12.88 TOR 11.1 n=82 LAC: 11.30 points over 89 games, 90% interval 9.74–13 LAC 11.3 n=89 BOS: 11.54 points over 93 games, 90% interval 10.13–13.06 BOS 11.5 n=93 OKC: 11.69 points over 104 games, 90% interval 10.11–13.16 OKC 11.7 n=104 MEM: 11.77 points over 86 games, 90% interval 10.07–13.73 MEM 11.8 n=86 SAC: 11.77 points over 82 games, 90% interval 10.07–13.39 SAC 11.8 n=82 NYK: 11.86 points over 100 games, 90% interval 10.5–13.1 NYK 11.9 n=100 LAL: 11.89 points over 87 games, 90% interval 10.06–13.62 LAL 11.9 n=87 DEN: 11.91 points over 96 games, 90% interval 10.55–13.48 DEN 11.9 n=96 GSW: 12.33 points over 94 games, 90% interval 10.68–13.97 GSW 12.3 n=94 CHI: 12.41 points over 82 games, 90% interval 10.89–13.89 CHI 12.4 n=82 POR: 13.05 points over 82 games, 90% interval 11.32–14.91 POR 13.1 n=82 average margin miss, points (lower = easier to forecast)
Dots: average absolute margin error per team. Lines: 90% bootstrap intervals; overlapping lines mean the difference between those teams is not clear in this sample. Hollow dots: fewer than 20 games.
All 82 games in this sample
DateOpponentNOP win prob.ProjectedFinalPickMargin error
Apr 13 vs OKC 21% 112–125 L 100–115 ✓correct −2
Apr 11 vs MIA 18% 104–119 L 104–153 ✓correct −34
Apr 10 at MIL 12% 104–122 L 111–136 ✓correct −7
Apr 8 at BKN 51% 108–107 L 114–119 ✗missed −6
Apr 6 vs MIL 21% 107–120 L 107–111 ✓correct +9
Apr 4 at LAL 21% 107–119 L 108–124 ✓correct −4
Apr 2 at LAC 18% 105–119 L 98–114 ✓correct −2
Mar 30 vs CHA 44% 109–112 W 98–94 ✗missed +7
Mar 28 vs GSW 23% 108–120 L 95–111 ✓correct −4
Mar 24 vs PHI 46% 113–115 W 112–99 ✗missed +15
Mar 23 at DET 21% 110–122 L 130–136 ✓correct +6
Mar 21 at MIN 25% 107–117 L 93–134 ✓correct −31
Mar 19 at MIN 25% 107–117 W 119–115 ✗missed +14
Mar 17 vs DET 34% 114–121 L 81–127 ✓correct −39
Mar 15 at SAS 38% 114–118 L 115–119 ✓correct ±0
Mar 13 vs ORL 49% 112–113 L 93–113 ✓correct −19
Mar 11 vs LAC 39% 109–114 W 127–120 ✗missed +12
Mar 9 vs MEM 36% 117–123 L 104–107 ✓correct +3
Mar 8 at HOU 29% 111–119 L 117–146 ✓correct −21
Mar 6 vs HOU 44% 114–117 L 97–109 ✓correct −9
Mar 4 at LAL 29% 110–118 L 115–136 ✓correct −13
Mar 2 at UTA 61% 119–114 W 128–121 ✓correct +2
Feb 28 at PHX 33% 117–123 L 108–125 ✓correct −11
Feb 27 at PHX 33% 115–121 W 124–116 ✗missed +14
Feb 25 vs SAS 46% 117–119 W 109–103 ✗missed +8
Feb 23 vs SAS 44% 116–119 W 114–96 ✗missed +21
Feb 21 at DAL 23% 114–125 L 103–111 ✓correct +3
Feb 13 vs SAC 25% 114–125 W 140–133 ✗missed +18
Feb 12 vs SAC 29% 114–123 L 111–119 ✓correct +1
Feb 10 at OKC 11% 112–131 L 101–137 ✓correct −17
Feb 8 at SAC 27% 114–123 L 118–123 ✓correct +4
Feb 5 at DEN 15% 112–128 L 119–144 ✓correct −9
Feb 3 at DEN 21% 113–125 L 113–125 ✓correct ±0
Jan 31 vs BOS 41% 112–116 L 116–118 ✓correct +2
Jan 29 vs DAL 41% 114–118 L 136–137 ✓correct +3
Jan 27 at TOR 41% 112–115 L 104–113 ✓correct −6
Jan 25 at CHA 54% 114–112 L 92–123 ✗missed −33
Jan 24 at MEM 23% 112–123 L 126–139 ✓correct −2
Jan 20 vs UTA 62% 115–111 W 123–119 ✓correct ±0
Jan 17 vs UTA 59% 113–110 W 136–123 ✓correct +10
Jan 15 vs DAL 46% 113–115 W 119–116 ✗missed +5
Jan 14 at CHI 29% 114–122 W 119–113 ✗missed +14
Jan 12 at BOS 18% 106–120 L 119–120 ✓correct +13
Jan 10 at PHI 23% 105–116 W 123–115 ✗missed +19
Jan 8 vs POR 57% 116–114 L 100–119 ✗missed −21
Jan 7 vs MIN 44% 111–114 L 97–104 ✓correct −4
Jan 5 at WAS 61% 118–113 W 110–98 ✓correct +7
Jan 3 vs WAS 64% 119–114 W 132–120 ✓correct +7
Jan 1 at MIA 25% 106–116 L 108–119 ✓correct −1
Dec 30 vs LAC 29% 112–121 L 113–116 ✓correct +6
Dec 27 vs MEM 25% 111–122 L 124–132 ✓correct +3
Dec 26 vs HOU 27% 110–120 L 111–128 ✓correct −7
Dec 22 vs DEN 25% 115–126 L 129–132 ✓correct +8
Dec 21 vs NYK 27% 108–118 L 93–104 ✓correct −1
Dec 19 at HOU 18% 105–119 L 113–133 ✓correct −6
Dec 15 at IND 31% 111–118 L 104–119 ✓correct −8
Dec 12 vs SAC 29% 113–122 L 109–111 ✓correct +7
Dec 8 at SAS 25% 111–121 L 116–121 ✓correct +5
Dec 7 vs OKC 27% 107–117 L 109–119 ✓correct ±0
Dec 5 vs PHX 41% 110–114 W 126–124 ✗missed +6
Dec 2 at ATL 31% 110–117 L 112–124 ✓correct −5
Dec 1 at NYK 18% 105–119 L 85–118 ✓correct −19
Nov 29 at MEM 16% 108–123 L 109–120 ✓correct +4
Nov 27 vs TOR 62% 109–105 L 93–119 ✗missed −30
Nov 25 at IND 29% 106–114 L 110–114 ✓correct +4
Nov 22 vs GSW 32% 107–115 L 108–112 ✓correct +4
Nov 20 at CLE 21% 109–121 L 100–128 ✓correct −16
Nov 19 at DAL 18% 104–118 L 91–132 ✓correct −27
Nov 16 vs LAL 29% 108–117 L 99–104 ✓correct +4
Nov 15 vs DEN 41% 110–114 W 101–94 ✗missed +11
Nov 13 at OKC 16% 108–123 L 88–106 ✓correct −3
Nov 11 vs BKN 36% 109–115 L 105–107 ✓correct +4
Nov 8 at ORL 38% 109–113 L 88–115 ✓correct −23
Nov 6 vs CLE 34% 108–115 L 122–131 ✓correct −2
Nov 4 vs POR 64% 113–108 L 100–118 ✗missed −23
Nov 3 vs ATL 69% 118–111 L 111–126 ✗missed −22
Nov 1 vs IND 46% 110–112 W 125–118 ✗missed +9
Oct 30 at GSW 27% 108–117 L 89–104 ✓correct −6
Oct 29 at GSW 36% 111–116 L 106–124 ✓correct −13
Oct 27 at POR 59% 112–108 L 103–125 ✗missed −26
Oct 25 at POR 66% 115–108 W 105–103 ✓correct −5
Oct 23 vs CHI 62% 110–106 W 123–111 ✓correct +8

2023-24

13.6 pts
average margin miss
90% interval 11.9 to 15.4; 30th smallest of 30
+1.1
average margin error
+ = better than forecast; 90% interval -2.0 to 3.9
16.6 pts
error variability
std. deviation; league margin miss 11.3
54%
winner picked
86 games involving NOP
49 / 46.8
actual / expected wins
gap +2.2
0.248
Brier score
0.25 = coin flip; lower is better

Expected and actual wins

NOP: cumulative expected wins from pregame win probabilities against actual wins 01020304050 49 actual 46.8 exp. 14386 Game number in sample
Solid: actual wins. Dashed: expected wins, the running sum of NOP's pregame win probability in each game.

Margin error, game by game

NOP: margin forecast error in each game, actual minus predicted -50-250+25+50 Better than forecast Worse than forecast Games in date order
Each bar is one game: NOP's actual margin minus its predicted margin, in points. Positive bars sit above the line and negative bars below it, so direction does not depend on color.

How the errors are spread

NOP: distribution of 86 margin errors; mean +1.1 points 0612 -40 to -36 pts: 1 games -36 to -32 pts: 1 games -32 to -28 pts: 0 games -28 to -24 pts: 3 games -24 to -20 pts: 4 games -20 to -16 pts: 4 games -16 to -12 pts: 3 games -12 to -8 pts: 12 games -8 to -4 pts: 6 games -4 to 0 pts: 6 games 0 to 4 pts: 6 games 4 to 8 pts: 9 games 8 to 12 pts: 7 games 12 to 16 pts: 8 games 16 to 20 pts: 4 games 20 to 24 pts: 2 games 24 to 28 pts: 4 games 28 to 32 pts: 2 games 32 to 36 pts: 3 games 36 to 40 pts: 1 games mean +1.1 -40-200+20+40 worse than forecast better than forecast
Each bar counts games whose margin error fell in a 4-point range (errors beyond ±40 are in the end bars). Dashed line: the average error.

NOP against the league

Average margin miss by team, 2023-24, smallest to largest; NOP is 30 of 30 79111315 median 11.0 PHX: 9.80 points over 86 games, 90% interval 8.63–11.01 PHX 9.8 n=86 WAS: 9.90 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.41–11.39 WAS 9.9 n=82 DET: 9.91 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.51–11.34 DET 9.9 n=82 CHI: 9.93 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.67–11.28 CHI 9.9 n=82 GSW: 10.13 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.49–11.84 GSW 10.1 n=82 DEN: 10.16 points over 94 games, 90% interval 8.71–11.82 DEN 10.2 n=94 LAC: 10.31 points over 88 games, 90% interval 8.94–11.67 LAC 10.3 n=88 HOU: 10.49 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.09–11.87 HOU 10.5 n=82 CHA: 10.60 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.87–12.37 CHA 10.6 n=82 SAS: 10.68 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.16–12.34 SAS 10.7 n=82 TOR: 10.71 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.94–12.41 TOR 10.7 n=82 PHI: 10.78 points over 88 games, 90% interval 9.32–12.18 PHI 10.8 n=88 LAL: 10.83 points over 87 games, 90% interval 9.3–12.37 LAL 10.8 n=87 MIN: 10.89 points over 98 games, 90% interval 9.4–12.27 MIN 10.9 n=98 ORL: 10.98 points over 89 games, 90% interval 9.61–12.31 ORL 11.0 n=89 MIA: 10.99 points over 87 games, 90% interval 9.3–12.83 MIA 11.0 n=87 MEM: 11.02 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.62–12.49 MEM 11.0 n=82 POR: 11.09 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.3–12.93 POR 11.1 n=82 BKN: 11.41 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.83–13.12 BKN 11.4 n=82 ATL: 11.43 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.74–13.3 ATL 11.4 n=82 NYK: 11.46 points over 95 games, 90% interval 10.13–12.84 NYK 11.5 n=95 CLE: 11.88 points over 94 games, 90% interval 10.45–13.49 CLE 11.9 n=94 UTA: 11.94 points over 82 games, 90% interval 10.29–13.62 UTA 11.9 n=82 OKC: 12.10 points over 92 games, 90% interval 10.34–13.93 OKC 12.1 n=92 MIL: 12.23 points over 88 games, 90% interval 10.58–13.77 MIL 12.2 n=88 SAC: 12.38 points over 82 games, 90% interval 10.73–14.11 SAC 12.4 n=82 IND: 12.71 points over 99 games, 90% interval 11.15–14.27 IND 12.7 n=99 BOS: 12.86 points over 101 games, 90% interval 11.3–14.57 BOS 12.9 n=101 DAL: 13.09 points over 104 games, 90% interval 11.49–14.72 DAL 13.1 n=104 NOP: 13.56 points over 86 games, 90% interval 11.94–15.36 NOP 13.6 n=86 average margin miss, points (lower = easier to forecast)
Dots: average absolute margin error per team. Lines: 90% bootstrap intervals; overlapping lines mean the difference between those teams is not clear in this sample. Hollow dots: fewer than 20 games.
All 86 games in this sample
DateOpponentNOP win prob.ProjectedFinalPickMargin error
Apr 29 PO vs OKC 51% 105–107 L 89–97 ✓correct −6
Apr 27 PO vs OKC 59% 110–108 L 85–106 ✗missed −23
Apr 24 PO at OKC 32% 106–113 L 92–124 ✓correct −25
Apr 21 PO at OKC 32% 107–114 L 92–94 ✓correct +5
Apr 14 vs LAL 65% 117–112 L 108–124 ✗missed −21
Apr 12 at GSW 43% 110–111 W 114–109 ✗missed +6
Apr 11 at SAC 43% 107–108 W 135–123 ✗missed +13
Apr 9 at POR 61% 114–106 W 110–100 ✓correct +2
Apr 7 at PHX 34% 106–112 W 113–105 ✗missed +14
Apr 5 vs SAS 73% 112–102 L 109–111 ✗missed −12
Apr 3 vs ORL 57% 106–105 L 108–117 ✗missed −10
Apr 1 vs PHX 65% 111–106 L 111–124 ✗missed −18
Mar 30 vs BOS 43% 102–108 L 92–104 ✓correct −6
Mar 28 vs MIL 65% 112–107 W 107–100 ✓correct +2
Mar 26 vs OKC 63% 113–109 L 112–119 ✗missed −11
Mar 24 at DET 71% 119–106 W 114–101 ✓correct ±0
Mar 22 at MIA 41% 106–108 W 111–88 ✗missed +25
Mar 21 at ORL 43% 107–108 L 106–121 ✓correct −14
Mar 19 at BKN 47% 112–111 W 104–91 ✓correct +12
Mar 16 vs POR 78% 114–101 W 126–107 ✓correct +6
Mar 15 vs LAC 65% 113–108 W 112–104 ✓correct +3
Mar 13 vs CLE 68% 114–107 L 95–116 ✗missed −28
Mar 10 at ATL 53% 112–108 W 116–103 ✓correct +9
Mar 8 at PHI 51% 111–108 W 103–95 ✓correct +5
Mar 5 at TOR 61% 120–112 W 139–98 ✓correct +33
Mar 1 vs IND 68% 117–110 W 129–102 ✓correct +20
Feb 28 at IND 41% 116–118 L 114–123 ✓correct −7
Feb 27 at NYK 39% 109–112 W 115–92 ✗missed +26
Feb 25 vs CHI 61% 112–109 L 106–114 ✗missed −11
Feb 23 vs MIA 65% 113–108 L 95–106 ✗missed −16
Feb 22 vs HOU 67% 117–111 W 127–105 ✓correct +16
Feb 14 vs WAS 82% 121–105 W 133–126 ✓correct −9
Feb 12 at MEM 59% 117–110 W 96–87 ✓correct +2
Feb 10 at POR 65% 122–112 W 93–84 ✓correct −1
Feb 9 at LAL 47% 117–116 L 122–139 ✗missed −18
Feb 7 at LAC 35% 112–117 W 117–106 ✗missed +16
Feb 5 vs TOR 72% 121–112 W 138–100 ✓correct +29
Feb 2 at SAS 57% 119–113 W 114–113 ✓correct −5
Jan 31 at HOU 51% 118–115 W 110–99 ✓correct +8
Jan 29 at BOS 41% 114–116 L 112–118 ✓correct −4
Jan 27 at MIL 39% 114–117 L 117–141 ✓correct −21
Jan 26 vs OKC 57% 115–114 L 83–107 ✗missed −25
Jan 23 vs UTA 61% 117–114 W 153–124 ✓correct +26
Jan 19 vs PHX 61% 111–108 L 109–123 ✗missed −17
Jan 17 vs CHA 82% 118–102 W 132–112 ✓correct +4
Jan 15 at DAL 59% 118–111 L 120–125 ✗missed −12
Jan 13 at DAL 43% 113–114 W 118–108 ✗missed +11
Jan 12 at DEN 39% 109–112 L 113–125 ✓correct −9
Jan 10 at GSW 51% 117–114 W 141–105 ✓correct +33
Jan 7 at SAC 41% 114–116 W 133–100 ✗missed +35
Jan 5 vs LAC 57% 112–111 L 95–111 ✗missed −17
Jan 3 at MIN 34% 109–115 W 117–106 ✗missed +17
Jan 2 vs BKN 67% 118–112 W 112–85 ✓correct +21
Dec 31 vs LAL 72% 122–113 W 129–109 ✓correct +11
Dec 28 vs UTA 72% 121–112 W 112–105 ✓correct −2
Dec 26 vs MEM 67% 119–113 L 115–116 ✗missed −7
Dec 23 vs HOU 67% 119–113 L 104–106 ✗missed −8
Dec 21 at CLE 47% 115–114 W 123–104 ✓correct +18
Dec 19 vs MEM 70% 120–112 L 113–115 ✗missed −10
Dec 17 at SAS 55% 120–115 W 146–110 ✓correct +31
Dec 15 at CHA 61% 120–112 W 112–107 ✓correct −3
Dec 13 at WAS 61% 123–115 W 142–122 ✓correct +12
Dec 11 vs MIN 61% 116–113 W 121–107 ✓correct +11
Dec 7 at LAL 39% 112–115 L 89–133 ✓correct −41
Dec 4 at SAC 39% 116–119 W 127–117 ✗missed +13
Dec 2 at CHI 53% 112–108 L 118–124 ✗missed −10
Dec 1 vs SAS 79% 125–111 W 121–106 ✓correct +1
Nov 29 vs PHI 51% 111–113 W 124–114 ✗missed +12
Nov 27 at UTA 49% 117–115 L 112–114 ✗missed −4
Nov 25 at UTA 59% 123–116 L 100–105 ✗missed −12
Nov 24 at LAC 41% 113–115 W 116–106 ✗missed +12
Nov 22 vs SAC 57% 117–116 W 117–112 ✓correct +4
Nov 20 vs SAC 51% 114–116 W 129–93 ✗missed +38
Nov 18 vs MIN 45% 112–117 L 120–121 ✓correct +4
Nov 17 vs DEN 49% 111–114 W 115–110 ✗missed +8
Nov 14 vs DAL 47% 113–117 W 131–110 ✗missed +25
Nov 12 vs DAL 57% 115–114 L 124–136 ✗missed −13
Nov 10 at HOU 43% 112–113 L 101–104 ✓correct −2
Nov 8 at MIN 28% 108–117 L 101–122 ✓correct −12
Nov 6 at DEN 34% 108–114 L 116–134 ✓correct −12
Nov 4 vs ATL 63% 118–114 L 105–123 ✗missed −22
Nov 2 vs DET 65% 114–109 W 125–116 ✓correct +4
Nov 1 at OKC 35% 112–117 W 110–106 ✗missed +9
Oct 30 vs GSW 65% 115–110 L 102–130 ✗missed −33
Oct 28 vs NYK 63% 113–109 W 96–87 ✓correct +5
Oct 25 at MEM 35% 110–115 W 111–104 ✗missed +12

2022-23

10.8 pts
average margin miss
90% interval 9.3 to 12.3; 20th smallest of 30
+0.6
average margin error
+ = better than forecast; 90% interval -1.8 to 3.0
13.7 pts
error variability
std. deviation; league margin miss 10.3
67%
winner picked
82 games involving NOP
42 / 43.6
actual / expected wins
gap −1.6
0.217
Brier score
0.25 = coin flip; lower is better

Expected and actual wins

NOP: cumulative expected wins from pregame win probabilities against actual wins 010203040 42 actual 43.6 exp. 14182 Game number in sample
Solid: actual wins. Dashed: expected wins, the running sum of NOP's pregame win probability in each game.

Margin error, game by game

NOP: margin forecast error in each game, actual minus predicted -50-250+25+50 Better than forecast Worse than forecast Games in date order
Each bar is one game: NOP's actual margin minus its predicted margin, in points. Positive bars sit above the line and negative bars below it, so direction does not depend on color.

How the errors are spread

NOP: distribution of 82 margin errors; mean +0.6 points 0612 -40 to -36 pts: 0 games -36 to -32 pts: 0 games -32 to -28 pts: 0 games -28 to -24 pts: 1 games -24 to -20 pts: 2 games -20 to -16 pts: 4 games -16 to -12 pts: 7 games -12 to -8 pts: 8 games -8 to -4 pts: 12 games -4 to 0 pts: 10 games 0 to 4 pts: 7 games 4 to 8 pts: 6 games 8 to 12 pts: 10 games 12 to 16 pts: 5 games 16 to 20 pts: 3 games 20 to 24 pts: 1 games 24 to 28 pts: 4 games 28 to 32 pts: 0 games 32 to 36 pts: 0 games 36 to 40 pts: 2 games mean +0.6 -40-200+20+40 worse than forecast better than forecast
Each bar counts games whose margin error fell in a 4-point range (errors beyond ±40 are in the end bars). Dashed line: the average error.

NOP against the league

Average margin miss by team, 2022-23, smallest to largest; NOP is 20 of 30 68101214 median 10.2 UTA: 8.74 points over 82 games, 90% interval 7.41–10.06 UTA 8.7 n=82 DET: 8.82 points over 82 games, 90% interval 7.57–10.1 DET 8.8 n=82 HOU: 9.06 points over 82 games, 90% interval 7.78–10.33 HOU 9.1 n=82 IND: 9.06 points over 82 games, 90% interval 7.91–10.26 IND 9.1 n=82 LAL: 9.19 points over 98 games, 90% interval 8.13–10.45 LAL 9.2 n=98 TOR: 9.30 points over 82 games, 90% interval 7.98–10.65 TOR 9.3 n=82 MIA: 9.42 points over 105 games, 90% interval 8.16–10.73 MIA 9.4 n=105 CLE: 9.63 points over 87 games, 90% interval 8.48–10.79 CLE 9.6 n=87 NYK: 9.65 points over 93 games, 90% interval 8.48–10.83 NYK 9.7 n=93 ORL: 9.88 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.6–11.21 ORL 9.9 n=82 DAL: 9.90 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.27–11.59 DAL 9.9 n=82 LAC: 9.90 points over 87 games, 90% interval 8.76–11.17 LAC 9.9 n=87 WAS: 10.06 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.61–11.52 WAS 10.1 n=82 ATL: 10.20 points over 88 games, 90% interval 8.92–11.51 ATL 10.2 n=88 PHI: 10.20 points over 93 games, 90% interval 8.81–11.6 PHI 10.2 n=93 MIN: 10.21 points over 87 games, 90% interval 8.99–11.47 MIN 10.2 n=87 OKC: 10.23 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.93–11.55 OKC 10.2 n=82 DEN: 10.51 points over 102 games, 90% interval 9.1–11.93 DEN 10.5 n=102 PHX: 10.81 points over 93 games, 90% interval 9.25–12.28 PHX 10.8 n=93 NOP: 10.82 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.34–12.26 NOP 10.8 n=82 CHA: 10.84 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.38–12.3 CHA 10.8 n=82 SAC: 10.99 points over 89 games, 90% interval 9.44–12.58 SAC 11.0 n=89 GSW: 11.24 points over 95 games, 90% interval 9.8–12.77 GSW 11.2 n=95 MEM: 11.40 points over 88 games, 90% interval 9.83–13.05 MEM 11.4 n=88 POR: 11.41 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.96–12.94 POR 11.4 n=82 BKN: 11.45 points over 86 games, 90% interval 9.79–13.3 BKN 11.4 n=86 BOS: 11.54 points over 102 games, 90% interval 9.99–13.05 BOS 11.5 n=102 CHI: 11.72 points over 82 games, 90% interval 10.11–13.48 CHI 11.7 n=82 MIL: 11.77 points over 87 games, 90% interval 10.3–13.32 MIL 11.8 n=87 SAS: 12.16 points over 82 games, 90% interval 10.54–13.79 SAS 12.2 n=82 average margin miss, points (lower = easier to forecast)
Dots: average absolute margin error per team. Lines: 90% bootstrap intervals; overlapping lines mean the difference between those teams is not clear in this sample. Hollow dots: fewer than 20 games.
All 82 games in this sample
DateOpponentNOP win prob.ProjectedFinalPickMargin error
Apr 9 at MIN 53% 115–114 L 108–113 ✗missed −6
Apr 7 vs NYK 63% 119–114 W 113–105 ✓correct +3
Apr 5 vs MEM 47% 114–115 W 138–131 ✗missed +8
Apr 4 vs SAC 55% 117–115 L 103–121 ✗missed −20
Apr 1 vs LAC 63% 116–111 W 122–114 ✓correct +3
Mar 30 at DEN 32% 109–116 W 107–88 ✗missed +26
Mar 28 at GSW 40% 114–118 L 109–120 ✓correct −7
Mar 27 at POR 80% 121–108 W 124–90 ✓correct +21
Mar 25 at LAC 37% 109–114 W 131–110 ✗missed +26
Mar 23 vs CHA 68% 115–108 W 115–96 ✓correct +12
Mar 21 vs SAS 76% 123–112 W 119–84 ✓correct +24
Mar 19 at HOU 58% 116–113 W 117–107 ✓correct +7
Mar 17 at HOU 60% 119–115 L 112–114 ✗missed −6
Mar 14 vs LAL 45% 113–115 L 108–123 ✓correct −13
Mar 12 vs POR 55% 115–113 W 127–110 ✓correct +15
Mar 11 vs OKC 47% 118–119 L 96–110 ✓correct −13
Mar 8 vs DAL 45% 115–117 W 113–106 ✗missed +9
Mar 6 at SAC 55% 115–113 L 108–123 ✗missed −17
Mar 3 at GSW 40% 112–116 L 99–108 ✓correct −5
Mar 1 at POR 53% 119–118 W 121–110 ✓correct +10
Feb 27 vs ORL 45% 112–114 L 93–101 ✓correct −6
Feb 25 at NYK 35% 109–115 L 106–128 ✓correct −16
Feb 23 at TOR 42% 114–117 L 110–115 ✓correct −2
Feb 15 at LAL 60% 120–116 L 102–120 ✗missed −22
Feb 13 at OKC 42% 117–120 W 103–100 ✗missed +6
Feb 10 vs CLE 47% 110–111 L 107–118 ✓correct −10
Feb 7 vs ATL 45% 116–118 W 116–107 ✗missed +11
Feb 5 vs SAC 28% 109–118 W 136–104 ✗missed +41
Feb 4 vs LAL 37% 112–117 W 131–126 ✗missed +10
Feb 2 at DAL 45% 110–112 L 106–111 ✓correct −3
Jan 31 at DEN 30% 108–116 L 113–122 ✓correct −1
Jan 29 at MIL 28% 110–119 L 110–135 ✓correct −16
Jan 28 vs WAS 53% 116–115 L 103–113 ✗missed −11
Jan 25 vs MIN 55% 117–115 L 102–111 ✗missed −11
Jan 24 vs DEN 40% 112–116 L 98–99 ✓correct +3
Jan 22 at MIA 42% 110–113 L 96–100 ✓correct −1
Jan 20 at ORL 63% 120–115 L 110–123 ✗missed −18
Jan 18 vs MIA 47% 109–110 L 98–124 ✓correct −25
Jan 16 at CLE 42% 111–114 L 103–113 ✓correct −7
Jan 13 at DET 63% 120–115 W 116–110 ✓correct +1
Jan 11 at BOS 22% 107–119 L 114–125 ✓correct +1
Jan 9 at WAS 55% 114–112 W 132–112 ✓correct +18
Jan 7 at DAL 47% 111–112 L 117–127 ✓correct −9
Jan 6 vs BKN 60% 115–111 L 102–108 ✗missed −10
Jan 4 vs HOU 76% 116–105 W 119–108 ✓correct ±0
Jan 2 at PHI 42% 114–117 L 111–120 ✓correct −6
Dec 31 at MEM 37% 112–117 L 101–116 ✓correct −10
Dec 30 vs PHI 58% 116–113 W 127–116 ✓correct +8
Dec 28 vs MIN 68% 117–110 W 119–118 ✓correct −6
Dec 26 vs IND 65% 116–110 W 113–93 ✓correct +14
Dec 23 at OKC 63% 117–112 W 128–125 ✓correct −2
Dec 22 vs SAS 81% 118–104 W 126–117 ✓correct −5
Dec 19 vs MIL 60% 116–112 L 119–128 ✗missed −13
Dec 17 at PHX 47% 111–112 L 114–118 ✓correct −3
Dec 15 at UTA 47% 113–114 L 129–132 ✓correct −2
Dec 13 at UTA 45% 115–117 L 100–121 ✓correct −19
Dec 11 vs PHX 68% 113–106 W 129–124 ✓correct −2
Dec 9 vs PHX 60% 114–110 W 128–117 ✓correct +7
Dec 7 vs DET 80% 120–107 W 104–98 ✓correct −7
Dec 4 vs DEN 70% 114–106 W 121–106 ✓correct +7
Dec 2 at SAS 72% 120–111 W 117–99 ✓correct +9
Nov 30 vs TOR 53% 112–111 W 126–108 ✓correct +17
Nov 28 vs OKC 70% 119–111 W 105–101 ✓correct −4
Nov 25 at MEM 53% 113–112 L 111–132 ✗missed −22
Nov 23 at SAS 68% 118–111 W 129–110 ✓correct +12
Nov 21 vs GSW 60% 117–113 W 128–83 ✓correct +41
Nov 18 vs BOS 53% 114–113 L 109–117 ✗missed −9
Nov 16 vs CHI 58% 113–110 W 124–110 ✓correct +11
Nov 15 vs MEM 53% 110–109 W 113–102 ✓correct +10
Nov 12 vs HOU 72% 116–107 W 119–106 ✓correct +4
Nov 10 vs POR 63% 113–108 L 95–106 ✗missed −16
Nov 9 at CHI 63% 115–110 W 115–111 ✓correct −1
Nov 7 at IND 70% 119–111 L 122–129 ✗missed −15
Nov 5 at ATL 58% 111–108 L 121–124 ✗missed −6
Nov 4 vs GSW 63% 118–113 W 114–105 ✓correct +4
Nov 2 at LAL 68% 116–109 L 117–120 ✗missed −10
Oct 30 at LAC 55% 112–110 W 112–91 ✓correct +19
Oct 28 at PHX 35% 105–111 L 111–124 ✓correct −7
Oct 25 vs DAL 32% 104–111 W 113–111 ✗missed +9
Oct 23 vs UTA 45% 107–109 L 121–122 ✓correct +1
Oct 21 at CHA 45% 113–115 W 124–112 ✗missed +14
Oct 19 at BKN 42% 110–113 W 130–108 ✗missed +25

2022-23 to 2026-27

11.0 pts
average margin miss
90% interval 10.3 to 11.7; 15th smallest of 30
+0.1
average margin error
+ = better than forecast; 90% interval -1.1 to 1.3
13.9 pts
error variability
std. deviation; league margin miss 11.0
66%
winner picked
342 games involving NOP
142 / 152.5
actual / expected wins
gap −10.5
0.202
Brier score
0.25 = coin flip; lower is better

Expected and actual wins

NOP: cumulative expected wins from pregame win probabilities against actual wins 0102030405060708090100110120130140150 142 actual 152.5 exp. 1171342 Game number in sample
Solid: actual wins. Dashed: expected wins, the running sum of NOP's pregame win probability in each game.

Margin error, game by game

NOP: margin forecast error in each game, actual minus predicted -50-250+25+50 Better than forecast Worse than forecast Games in date order
Each bar is one game: NOP's actual margin minus its predicted margin, in points. Positive bars sit above the line and negative bars below it, so direction does not depend on color.

How the errors are spread

NOP: distribution of 342 margin errors; mean +0.1 points 02549 -40 to -36 pts: 2 games -36 to -32 pts: 4 games -32 to -28 pts: 2 games -28 to -24 pts: 6 games -24 to -20 pts: 12 games -20 to -16 pts: 14 games -16 to -12 pts: 18 games -12 to -8 pts: 31 games -8 to -4 pts: 39 games -4 to 0 pts: 35 games 0 to 4 pts: 34 games 4 to 8 pts: 49 games 8 to 12 pts: 31 games 12 to 16 pts: 25 games 16 to 20 pts: 13 games 20 to 24 pts: 9 games 24 to 28 pts: 9 games 28 to 32 pts: 3 games 32 to 36 pts: 3 games 36 to 40 pts: 3 games mean +0.1 -40-200+20+40 worse than forecast better than forecast
Each bar counts games whose margin error fell in a 4-point range (errors beyond ±40 are in the end bars). Dashed line: the average error.

NOP against the league

Average margin miss by team, 2022-23 to 2026-27, smallest to largest; NOP is 15 of 30 891011121314 median 11.0 DET: 9.80 points over 356 games, 90% interval 9.17–10.47 DET 9.8 n=356 HOU: 10.09 points over 350 games, 90% interval 9.46–10.73 HOU 10.1 n=350 PHX: 10.25 points over 355 games, 90% interval 9.56–10.97 PHX 10.3 n=355 ORL: 10.50 points over 353 games, 90% interval 9.8–11.22 ORL 10.5 n=353 UTA: 10.63 points over 338 games, 90% interval 9.81–11.47 UTA 10.6 n=338 PHI: 10.64 points over 367 games, 90% interval 9.93–11.41 PHI 10.6 n=367 IND: 10.67 points over 376 games, 90% interval 9.99–11.4 IND 10.7 n=376 LAL: 10.71 points over 375 games, 90% interval 10.03–11.43 LAL 10.7 n=375 CLE: 10.74 points over 382 games, 90% interval 10.07–11.47 CLE 10.7 n=382 WAS: 10.74 points over 337 games, 90% interval 10.06–11.49 WAS 10.7 n=337 LAC: 10.76 points over 355 games, 90% interval 10.03–11.52 LAC 10.8 n=355 DEN: 10.83 points over 388 games, 90% interval 10.1–11.61 DEN 10.8 n=388 SAS: 10.88 points over 357 games, 90% interval 10.14–11.63 SAS 10.9 n=357 MIA: 10.95 points over 369 games, 90% interval 10.19–11.7 MIA 10.9 n=369 NOP: 10.98 points over 342 games, 90% interval 10.27–11.74 NOP 11.0 n=342 TOR: 11.08 points over 344 games, 90% interval 10.29–11.88 TOR 11.1 n=344 GSW: 11.12 points over 363 games, 90% interval 10.4–11.91 GSW 11.1 n=363 DAL: 11.15 points over 359 games, 90% interval 10.45–11.87 DAL 11.2 n=359 CHA: 11.18 points over 338 games, 90% interval 10.34–12.05 CHA 11.2 n=338 MIN: 11.18 points over 387 games, 90% interval 10.53–11.91 MIN 11.2 n=387 ATL: 11.32 points over 350 games, 90% interval 10.57–12.13 ATL 11.3 n=350 MEM: 11.35 points over 345 games, 90% interval 10.54–12.23 MEM 11.3 n=345 CHI: 11.43 points over 337 games, 90% interval 10.66–12.23 CHI 11.4 n=337 OKC: 11.49 points over 384 games, 90% interval 10.7–12.29 OKC 11.5 n=384 BKN: 11.55 points over 342 games, 90% interval 10.75–12.41 BKN 11.6 n=342 POR: 11.61 points over 342 games, 90% interval 10.75–12.42 POR 11.6 n=342 NYK: 11.63 points over 396 games, 90% interval 10.88–12.36 NYK 11.6 n=396 SAC: 11.66 points over 345 games, 90% interval 10.84–12.46 SAC 11.7 n=345 MIL: 11.68 points over 353 games, 90% interval 10.92–12.46 MIL 11.7 n=353 BOS: 11.96 points over 395 games, 90% interval 11.24–12.73 BOS 12.0 n=395 average margin miss, points (lower = easier to forecast)
Dots: average absolute margin error per team. Lines: 90% bootstrap intervals; overlapping lines mean the difference between those teams is not clear in this sample. Hollow dots: fewer than 20 games.
All 342 games in this sample
DateOpponentNOP win prob.ProjectedFinalPickMargin error
Nov 8 at LAC 39% 115–119 L 123–139 ✓correct −12
Nov 6 vs MIN 30% 115–122 L 109–115 ✓correct +1
Nov 4 vs UTA 73% 122–114 W 120–113 ✓correct −1
Nov 2 at MEM 44% 118–120 W 135–134 ✗missed +3
Oct 31 vs ATL 36% 118–123 W 121–99 ✗missed +27
Oct 29 vs SAC 56% 122–120 W 132–120 ✓correct +10
Oct 28 vs DEN 41% 118–121 L 91–104 ✓correct −10
Oct 24 at DEN 24% 113–123 L 135–141 ✓correct +4
Oct 23 at UTA 56% 123–121 L 119–120 ✗missed −3
Oct 21 vs IND 59% 124–121 L 120–123 ✗missed −6
Apr 12 at MIN 15% 107–122 L 126–132 ✓correct +9
Apr 10 at BOS 15% 105–120 L 118–144 ✓correct −11
Apr 7 vs UTA 59% 120–117 W 156–137 ✓correct +16
Apr 5 vs ORL 31% 111–118 L 108–112 ✓correct +3
Apr 3 at SAC 56% 115–113 L 113–117 ✗missed −6
Apr 2 at POR 31% 111–118 L 106–118 ✓correct −5
Mar 29 vs HOU 53% 115–114 L 102–134 ✗missed −33
Mar 27 at TOR 34% 113–119 L 106–119 ✓correct −7
Mar 26 at DET 31% 112–119 L 108–129 ✓correct −14
Mar 24 at NYK 34% 112–118 L 116–121 ✓correct +1
Mar 21 vs CLE 53% 116–115 L 106–111 ✗missed −6
Mar 19 vs LAC 47% 117–118 W 105–99 ✗missed +7
Mar 18 vs LAC 44% 118–120 W 124–109 ✗missed +17
Mar 16 vs DAL 67% 121–115 W 129–111 ✓correct +12
Mar 13 at HOU 34% 115–121 L 105–107 ✓correct +4
Mar 11 vs TOR 42% 115–118 W 122–111 ✗missed +14
Mar 8 vs WAS 71% 123–115 W 138–118 ✓correct +12
Mar 6 at PHX 53% 111–110 L 116–118 ✗missed −3
Mar 5 at SAC 66% 119–113 W 133–123 ✓correct +4
Mar 3 at LAL 34% 114–120 L 101–110 ✓correct −3
Mar 1 at LAC 39% 112–116 L 117–137 ✓correct −16
Feb 28 at UTA 64% 117–112 W 115–105 ✓correct +5
Feb 26 at UTA 64% 117–112 W 129–118 ✓correct +6
Feb 24 vs GSW 42% 112–115 W 113–109 ✗missed +7
Feb 21 vs PHI 47% 113–114 W 126–111 ✗missed +16
Feb 20 vs MIL 44% 109–111 L 118–139 ✓correct −19
Feb 11 vs MIA 44% 114–116 L 111–123 ✓correct −10
Feb 9 vs SAC 61% 115–111 W 120–94 ✓correct +22
Feb 6 at MIN 24% 112–122 W 119–115 ✗missed +14
Feb 4 at MIL 58% 112–109 L 137–141 ✗missed −7
Feb 2 at CHA 24% 108–118 L 95–102 ✓correct +3
Jan 31 at PHI 36% 112–117 L 114–124 ✓correct −5
Jan 30 vs MEM 56% 115–113 W 114–106 ✓correct +6
Jan 27 at OKC 14% 110–126 L 95–104 ✓correct +7
Jan 25 at SAS 20% 109–121 W 104–95 ✗missed +21
Jan 23 at MEM 34% 113–119 W 133–127 ✗missed +12
Jan 21 vs DET 22% 108–119 L 104–112 ✓correct +3
Jan 18 at HOU 24% 106–116 L 110–119 ✓correct +1
Jan 16 at IND 44% 116–118 L 119–127 ✓correct −6
Jan 14 vs BKN 47% 113–114 W 116–113 ✗missed +4
Jan 13 vs DEN 47% 114–115 L 116–122 ✓correct −5
Jan 11 at ORL 24% 112–122 L 118–128 ✓correct ±0
Jan 9 at WAS 44% 116–118 W 128–107 ✗missed +23
Jan 7 at ATL 36% 118–123 L 100–117 ✓correct −12
Jan 6 vs LAL 34% 115–121 L 103–111 ✓correct −2
Jan 4 at MIA 22% 112–123 L 106–125 ✓correct −8
Jan 2 vs POR 39% 116–120 L 109–122 ✓correct −9
Dec 31 at CHI 53% 119–118 L 118–134 ✗missed −17
Dec 29 vs NYK 22% 115–126 L 125–130 ✓correct +6
Dec 27 vs PHX 42% 115–118 L 114–123 ✓correct −6
Dec 26 vs PHX 42% 117–120 L 108–115 ✓correct −4
Dec 23 at CLE 26% 116–125 L 118–141 ✓correct −14
Dec 22 vs DAL 44% 118–120 W 119–113 ✗missed +8
Dec 20 vs IND 44% 115–117 W 128–109 ✗missed +21
Dec 18 vs HOU 20% 113–125 W 133–128 ✗missed +17
Dec 14 at CHI 44% 119–121 W 114–104 ✗missed +12
Dec 11 vs POR 31% 114–121 W 143–120 ✗missed +30
Dec 8 vs SAS 24% 115–125 L 132–135 ✓correct +7
Dec 6 at BKN 39% 112–116 L 101–119 ✓correct −14
Dec 4 vs MIN 19% 111–124 L 116–125 ✓correct +4
Dec 2 vs MIN 15% 109–124 L 142–149 ✓correct +8
Nov 30 at LAL 10% 107–126 L 121–133 ✓correct +7
Nov 29 at GSW 20% 109–121 L 96–104 ✓correct +4
Nov 26 vs MEM 39% 114–118 L 128–133 ✓correct −1
Nov 24 vs CHI 31% 116–123 W 143–130 ✗missed +20
Nov 22 vs ATL 22% 112–123 L 98–115 ✓correct −6
Nov 21 at DAL 34% 111–117 L 115–118 ✓correct +3
Nov 19 vs DEN 17% 112–126 L 118–125 ✓correct +7
Nov 17 vs OKC 15% 112–127 L 109–126 ✓correct −2
Nov 16 vs GSW 31% 110–117 L 106–124 ✓correct −11
Nov 14 vs LAL 24% 109–119 L 104–118 ✓correct −4
Nov 12 vs POR 19% 110–123 L 117–125 ✓correct +5
Nov 10 at PHX 22% 111–122 L 98–121 ✓correct −12
Nov 8 at SAS 14% 106–122 L 119–126 ✓correct +9
Nov 5 at DAL 29% 111–119 W 101–99 ✗missed +10
Nov 4 vs CHA 47% 115–116 W 116–112 ✗missed +5
Nov 2 at OKC 15% 104–119 L 106–137 ✓correct −16
Oct 31 at LAC 19% 103–116 L 124–126 ✓correct +11
Oct 29 at DEN 15% 108–123 L 88–122 ✓correct −19
Oct 27 vs BOS 27% 107–116 L 90–122 ✓correct −23
Oct 24 vs SAS 34% 114–120 L 116–120 ✓correct +2
Oct 22 at MEM 20% 109–121 L 122–128 ✓correct +6
Apr 13 vs OKC 21% 112–125 L 100–115 ✓correct −2
Apr 11 vs MIA 18% 104–119 L 104–153 ✓correct −34
Apr 10 at MIL 12% 104–122 L 111–136 ✓correct −7
Apr 8 at BKN 51% 108–107 L 114–119 ✗missed −6
Apr 6 vs MIL 21% 107–120 L 107–111 ✓correct +9
Apr 4 at LAL 21% 107–119 L 108–124 ✓correct −4
Apr 2 at LAC 18% 105–119 L 98–114 ✓correct −2
Mar 30 vs CHA 44% 109–112 W 98–94 ✗missed +7
Mar 28 vs GSW 23% 108–120 L 95–111 ✓correct −4
Mar 24 vs PHI 46% 113–115 W 112–99 ✗missed +15
Mar 23 at DET 21% 110–122 L 130–136 ✓correct +6
Mar 21 at MIN 25% 107–117 L 93–134 ✓correct −31
Mar 19 at MIN 25% 107–117 W 119–115 ✗missed +14
Mar 17 vs DET 34% 114–121 L 81–127 ✓correct −39
Mar 15 at SAS 38% 114–118 L 115–119 ✓correct ±0
Mar 13 vs ORL 49% 112–113 L 93–113 ✓correct −19
Mar 11 vs LAC 39% 109–114 W 127–120 ✗missed +12
Mar 9 vs MEM 36% 117–123 L 104–107 ✓correct +3
Mar 8 at HOU 29% 111–119 L 117–146 ✓correct −21
Mar 6 vs HOU 44% 114–117 L 97–109 ✓correct −9
Mar 4 at LAL 29% 110–118 L 115–136 ✓correct −13
Mar 2 at UTA 61% 119–114 W 128–121 ✓correct +2
Feb 28 at PHX 33% 117–123 L 108–125 ✓correct −11
Feb 27 at PHX 33% 115–121 W 124–116 ✗missed +14
Feb 25 vs SAS 46% 117–119 W 109–103 ✗missed +8
Feb 23 vs SAS 44% 116–119 W 114–96 ✗missed +21
Feb 21 at DAL 23% 114–125 L 103–111 ✓correct +3
Feb 13 vs SAC 25% 114–125 W 140–133 ✗missed +18
Feb 12 vs SAC 29% 114–123 L 111–119 ✓correct +1
Feb 10 at OKC 11% 112–131 L 101–137 ✓correct −17
Feb 8 at SAC 27% 114–123 L 118–123 ✓correct +4
Feb 5 at DEN 15% 112–128 L 119–144 ✓correct −9
Feb 3 at DEN 21% 113–125 L 113–125 ✓correct ±0
Jan 31 vs BOS 41% 112–116 L 116–118 ✓correct +2
Jan 29 vs DAL 41% 114–118 L 136–137 ✓correct +3
Jan 27 at TOR 41% 112–115 L 104–113 ✓correct −6
Jan 25 at CHA 54% 114–112 L 92–123 ✗missed −33
Jan 24 at MEM 23% 112–123 L 126–139 ✓correct −2
Jan 20 vs UTA 62% 115–111 W 123–119 ✓correct ±0
Jan 17 vs UTA 59% 113–110 W 136–123 ✓correct +10
Jan 15 vs DAL 46% 113–115 W 119–116 ✗missed +5
Jan 14 at CHI 29% 114–122 W 119–113 ✗missed +14
Jan 12 at BOS 18% 106–120 L 119–120 ✓correct +13
Jan 10 at PHI 23% 105–116 W 123–115 ✗missed +19
Jan 8 vs POR 57% 116–114 L 100–119 ✗missed −21
Jan 7 vs MIN 44% 111–114 L 97–104 ✓correct −4
Jan 5 at WAS 61% 118–113 W 110–98 ✓correct +7
Jan 3 vs WAS 64% 119–114 W 132–120 ✓correct +7
Jan 1 at MIA 25% 106–116 L 108–119 ✓correct −1
Dec 30 vs LAC 29% 112–121 L 113–116 ✓correct +6
Dec 27 vs MEM 25% 111–122 L 124–132 ✓correct +3
Dec 26 vs HOU 27% 110–120 L 111–128 ✓correct −7
Dec 22 vs DEN 25% 115–126 L 129–132 ✓correct +8
Dec 21 vs NYK 27% 108–118 L 93–104 ✓correct −1
Dec 19 at HOU 18% 105–119 L 113–133 ✓correct −6
Dec 15 at IND 31% 111–118 L 104–119 ✓correct −8
Dec 12 vs SAC 29% 113–122 L 109–111 ✓correct +7
Dec 8 at SAS 25% 111–121 L 116–121 ✓correct +5
Dec 7 vs OKC 27% 107–117 L 109–119 ✓correct ±0
Dec 5 vs PHX 41% 110–114 W 126–124 ✗missed +6
Dec 2 at ATL 31% 110–117 L 112–124 ✓correct −5
Dec 1 at NYK 18% 105–119 L 85–118 ✓correct −19
Nov 29 at MEM 16% 108–123 L 109–120 ✓correct +4
Nov 27 vs TOR 62% 109–105 L 93–119 ✗missed −30
Nov 25 at IND 29% 106–114 L 110–114 ✓correct +4
Nov 22 vs GSW 32% 107–115 L 108–112 ✓correct +4
Nov 20 at CLE 21% 109–121 L 100–128 ✓correct −16
Nov 19 at DAL 18% 104–118 L 91–132 ✓correct −27
Nov 16 vs LAL 29% 108–117 L 99–104 ✓correct +4
Nov 15 vs DEN 41% 110–114 W 101–94 ✗missed +11
Nov 13 at OKC 16% 108–123 L 88–106 ✓correct −3
Nov 11 vs BKN 36% 109–115 L 105–107 ✓correct +4
Nov 8 at ORL 38% 109–113 L 88–115 ✓correct −23
Nov 6 vs CLE 34% 108–115 L 122–131 ✓correct −2
Nov 4 vs POR 64% 113–108 L 100–118 ✗missed −23
Nov 3 vs ATL 69% 118–111 L 111–126 ✗missed −22
Nov 1 vs IND 46% 110–112 W 125–118 ✗missed +9
Oct 30 at GSW 27% 108–117 L 89–104 ✓correct −6
Oct 29 at GSW 36% 111–116 L 106–124 ✓correct −13
Oct 27 at POR 59% 112–108 L 103–125 ✗missed −26
Oct 25 at POR 66% 115–108 W 105–103 ✓correct −5
Oct 23 vs CHI 62% 110–106 W 123–111 ✓correct +8
Apr 29 PO vs OKC 51% 105–107 L 89–97 ✓correct −6
Apr 27 PO vs OKC 59% 110–108 L 85–106 ✗missed −23
Apr 24 PO at OKC 32% 106–113 L 92–124 ✓correct −25
Apr 21 PO at OKC 32% 107–114 L 92–94 ✓correct +5
Apr 14 vs LAL 65% 117–112 L 108–124 ✗missed −21
Apr 12 at GSW 43% 110–111 W 114–109 ✗missed +6
Apr 11 at SAC 43% 107–108 W 135–123 ✗missed +13
Apr 9 at POR 61% 114–106 W 110–100 ✓correct +2
Apr 7 at PHX 34% 106–112 W 113–105 ✗missed +14
Apr 5 vs SAS 73% 112–102 L 109–111 ✗missed −12
Apr 3 vs ORL 57% 106–105 L 108–117 ✗missed −10
Apr 1 vs PHX 65% 111–106 L 111–124 ✗missed −18
Mar 30 vs BOS 43% 102–108 L 92–104 ✓correct −6
Mar 28 vs MIL 65% 112–107 W 107–100 ✓correct +2
Mar 26 vs OKC 63% 113–109 L 112–119 ✗missed −11
Mar 24 at DET 71% 119–106 W 114–101 ✓correct ±0
Mar 22 at MIA 41% 106–108 W 111–88 ✗missed +25
Mar 21 at ORL 43% 107–108 L 106–121 ✓correct −14
Mar 19 at BKN 47% 112–111 W 104–91 ✓correct +12
Mar 16 vs POR 78% 114–101 W 126–107 ✓correct +6
Mar 15 vs LAC 65% 113–108 W 112–104 ✓correct +3
Mar 13 vs CLE 68% 114–107 L 95–116 ✗missed −28
Mar 10 at ATL 53% 112–108 W 116–103 ✓correct +9
Mar 8 at PHI 51% 111–108 W 103–95 ✓correct +5
Mar 5 at TOR 61% 120–112 W 139–98 ✓correct +33
Mar 1 vs IND 68% 117–110 W 129–102 ✓correct +20
Feb 28 at IND 41% 116–118 L 114–123 ✓correct −7
Feb 27 at NYK 39% 109–112 W 115–92 ✗missed +26
Feb 25 vs CHI 61% 112–109 L 106–114 ✗missed −11
Feb 23 vs MIA 65% 113–108 L 95–106 ✗missed −16
Feb 22 vs HOU 67% 117–111 W 127–105 ✓correct +16
Feb 14 vs WAS 82% 121–105 W 133–126 ✓correct −9
Feb 12 at MEM 59% 117–110 W 96–87 ✓correct +2
Feb 10 at POR 65% 122–112 W 93–84 ✓correct −1
Feb 9 at LAL 47% 117–116 L 122–139 ✗missed −18
Feb 7 at LAC 35% 112–117 W 117–106 ✗missed +16
Feb 5 vs TOR 72% 121–112 W 138–100 ✓correct +29
Feb 2 at SAS 57% 119–113 W 114–113 ✓correct −5
Jan 31 at HOU 51% 118–115 W 110–99 ✓correct +8
Jan 29 at BOS 41% 114–116 L 112–118 ✓correct −4
Jan 27 at MIL 39% 114–117 L 117–141 ✓correct −21
Jan 26 vs OKC 57% 115–114 L 83–107 ✗missed −25
Jan 23 vs UTA 61% 117–114 W 153–124 ✓correct +26
Jan 19 vs PHX 61% 111–108 L 109–123 ✗missed −17
Jan 17 vs CHA 82% 118–102 W 132–112 ✓correct +4
Jan 15 at DAL 59% 118–111 L 120–125 ✗missed −12
Jan 13 at DAL 43% 113–114 W 118–108 ✗missed +11
Jan 12 at DEN 39% 109–112 L 113–125 ✓correct −9
Jan 10 at GSW 51% 117–114 W 141–105 ✓correct +33
Jan 7 at SAC 41% 114–116 W 133–100 ✗missed +35
Jan 5 vs LAC 57% 112–111 L 95–111 ✗missed −17
Jan 3 at MIN 34% 109–115 W 117–106 ✗missed +17
Jan 2 vs BKN 67% 118–112 W 112–85 ✓correct +21
Dec 31 vs LAL 72% 122–113 W 129–109 ✓correct +11
Dec 28 vs UTA 72% 121–112 W 112–105 ✓correct −2
Dec 26 vs MEM 67% 119–113 L 115–116 ✗missed −7
Dec 23 vs HOU 67% 119–113 L 104–106 ✗missed −8
Dec 21 at CLE 47% 115–114 W 123–104 ✓correct +18
Dec 19 vs MEM 70% 120–112 L 113–115 ✗missed −10
Dec 17 at SAS 55% 120–115 W 146–110 ✓correct +31
Dec 15 at CHA 61% 120–112 W 112–107 ✓correct −3
Dec 13 at WAS 61% 123–115 W 142–122 ✓correct +12
Dec 11 vs MIN 61% 116–113 W 121–107 ✓correct +11
Dec 7 at LAL 39% 112–115 L 89–133 ✓correct −41
Dec 4 at SAC 39% 116–119 W 127–117 ✗missed +13
Dec 2 at CHI 53% 112–108 L 118–124 ✗missed −10
Dec 1 vs SAS 79% 125–111 W 121–106 ✓correct +1
Nov 29 vs PHI 51% 111–113 W 124–114 ✗missed +12
Nov 27 at UTA 49% 117–115 L 112–114 ✗missed −4
Nov 25 at UTA 59% 123–116 L 100–105 ✗missed −12
Nov 24 at LAC 41% 113–115 W 116–106 ✗missed +12
Nov 22 vs SAC 57% 117–116 W 117–112 ✓correct +4
Nov 20 vs SAC 51% 114–116 W 129–93 ✗missed +38
Nov 18 vs MIN 45% 112–117 L 120–121 ✓correct +4
Nov 17 vs DEN 49% 111–114 W 115–110 ✗missed +8
Nov 14 vs DAL 47% 113–117 W 131–110 ✗missed +25
Nov 12 vs DAL 57% 115–114 L 124–136 ✗missed −13
Nov 10 at HOU 43% 112–113 L 101–104 ✓correct −2
Nov 8 at MIN 28% 108–117 L 101–122 ✓correct −12
Nov 6 at DEN 34% 108–114 L 116–134 ✓correct −12
Nov 4 vs ATL 63% 118–114 L 105–123 ✗missed −22
Nov 2 vs DET 65% 114–109 W 125–116 ✓correct +4
Nov 1 at OKC 35% 112–117 W 110–106 ✗missed +9
Oct 30 vs GSW 65% 115–110 L 102–130 ✗missed −33
Oct 28 vs NYK 63% 113–109 W 96–87 ✓correct +5
Oct 25 at MEM 35% 110–115 W 111–104 ✗missed +12
Apr 9 at MIN 53% 115–114 L 108–113 ✗missed −6
Apr 7 vs NYK 63% 119–114 W 113–105 ✓correct +3
Apr 5 vs MEM 47% 114–115 W 138–131 ✗missed +8
Apr 4 vs SAC 55% 117–115 L 103–121 ✗missed −20
Apr 1 vs LAC 63% 116–111 W 122–114 ✓correct +3
Mar 30 at DEN 32% 109–116 W 107–88 ✗missed +26
Mar 28 at GSW 40% 114–118 L 109–120 ✓correct −7
Mar 27 at POR 80% 121–108 W 124–90 ✓correct +21
Mar 25 at LAC 37% 109–114 W 131–110 ✗missed +26
Mar 23 vs CHA 68% 115–108 W 115–96 ✓correct +12
Mar 21 vs SAS 76% 123–112 W 119–84 ✓correct +24
Mar 19 at HOU 58% 116–113 W 117–107 ✓correct +7
Mar 17 at HOU 60% 119–115 L 112–114 ✗missed −6
Mar 14 vs LAL 45% 113–115 L 108–123 ✓correct −13
Mar 12 vs POR 55% 115–113 W 127–110 ✓correct +15
Mar 11 vs OKC 47% 118–119 L 96–110 ✓correct −13
Mar 8 vs DAL 45% 115–117 W 113–106 ✗missed +9
Mar 6 at SAC 55% 115–113 L 108–123 ✗missed −17
Mar 3 at GSW 40% 112–116 L 99–108 ✓correct −5
Mar 1 at POR 53% 119–118 W 121–110 ✓correct +10
Feb 27 vs ORL 45% 112–114 L 93–101 ✓correct −6
Feb 25 at NYK 35% 109–115 L 106–128 ✓correct −16
Feb 23 at TOR 42% 114–117 L 110–115 ✓correct −2
Feb 15 at LAL 60% 120–116 L 102–120 ✗missed −22
Feb 13 at OKC 42% 117–120 W 103–100 ✗missed +6
Feb 10 vs CLE 47% 110–111 L 107–118 ✓correct −10
Feb 7 vs ATL 45% 116–118 W 116–107 ✗missed +11
Feb 5 vs SAC 28% 109–118 W 136–104 ✗missed +41
Feb 4 vs LAL 37% 112–117 W 131–126 ✗missed +10
Feb 2 at DAL 45% 110–112 L 106–111 ✓correct −3
Jan 31 at DEN 30% 108–116 L 113–122 ✓correct −1
Jan 29 at MIL 28% 110–119 L 110–135 ✓correct −16
Jan 28 vs WAS 53% 116–115 L 103–113 ✗missed −11
Jan 25 vs MIN 55% 117–115 L 102–111 ✗missed −11
Jan 24 vs DEN 40% 112–116 L 98–99 ✓correct +3
Jan 22 at MIA 42% 110–113 L 96–100 ✓correct −1
Jan 20 at ORL 63% 120–115 L 110–123 ✗missed −18
Jan 18 vs MIA 47% 109–110 L 98–124 ✓correct −25
Jan 16 at CLE 42% 111–114 L 103–113 ✓correct −7
Jan 13 at DET 63% 120–115 W 116–110 ✓correct +1
Jan 11 at BOS 22% 107–119 L 114–125 ✓correct +1
Jan 9 at WAS 55% 114–112 W 132–112 ✓correct +18
Jan 7 at DAL 47% 111–112 L 117–127 ✓correct −9
Jan 6 vs BKN 60% 115–111 L 102–108 ✗missed −10
Jan 4 vs HOU 76% 116–105 W 119–108 ✓correct ±0
Jan 2 at PHI 42% 114–117 L 111–120 ✓correct −6
Dec 31 at MEM 37% 112–117 L 101–116 ✓correct −10
Dec 30 vs PHI 58% 116–113 W 127–116 ✓correct +8
Dec 28 vs MIN 68% 117–110 W 119–118 ✓correct −6
Dec 26 vs IND 65% 116–110 W 113–93 ✓correct +14
Dec 23 at OKC 63% 117–112 W 128–125 ✓correct −2
Dec 22 vs SAS 81% 118–104 W 126–117 ✓correct −5
Dec 19 vs MIL 60% 116–112 L 119–128 ✗missed −13
Dec 17 at PHX 47% 111–112 L 114–118 ✓correct −3
Dec 15 at UTA 47% 113–114 L 129–132 ✓correct −2
Dec 13 at UTA 45% 115–117 L 100–121 ✓correct −19
Dec 11 vs PHX 68% 113–106 W 129–124 ✓correct −2
Dec 9 vs PHX 60% 114–110 W 128–117 ✓correct +7
Dec 7 vs DET 80% 120–107 W 104–98 ✓correct −7
Dec 4 vs DEN 70% 114–106 W 121–106 ✓correct +7
Dec 2 at SAS 72% 120–111 W 117–99 ✓correct +9
Nov 30 vs TOR 53% 112–111 W 126–108 ✓correct +17
Nov 28 vs OKC 70% 119–111 W 105–101 ✓correct −4
Nov 25 at MEM 53% 113–112 L 111–132 ✗missed −22
Nov 23 at SAS 68% 118–111 W 129–110 ✓correct +12
Nov 21 vs GSW 60% 117–113 W 128–83 ✓correct +41
Nov 18 vs BOS 53% 114–113 L 109–117 ✗missed −9
Nov 16 vs CHI 58% 113–110 W 124–110 ✓correct +11
Nov 15 vs MEM 53% 110–109 W 113–102 ✓correct +10
Nov 12 vs HOU 72% 116–107 W 119–106 ✓correct +4
Nov 10 vs POR 63% 113–108 L 95–106 ✗missed −16
Nov 9 at CHI 63% 115–110 W 115–111 ✓correct −1
Nov 7 at IND 70% 119–111 L 122–129 ✗missed −15
Nov 5 at ATL 58% 111–108 L 121–124 ✗missed −6
Nov 4 vs GSW 63% 118–113 W 114–105 ✓correct +4
Nov 2 at LAL 68% 116–109 L 117–120 ✗missed −10
Oct 30 at LAC 55% 112–110 W 112–91 ✓correct +19
Oct 28 at PHX 35% 105–111 L 111–124 ✓correct −7
Oct 25 vs DAL 32% 104–111 W 113–111 ✗missed +9
Oct 23 vs UTA 45% 107–109 L 121–122 ✓correct +1
Oct 21 at CHA 45% 113–115 W 124–112 ✗missed +14
Oct 19 at BKN 42% 110–113 W 130–108 ✗missed +25

Surprise games

All NOP surprises

Across every graded season. The percentage is the pregame chance the forecast gave the team that won.

Most unexpected NOP wins

  1. 20%NOP beat SAS104–95Jan 25, 2025-26 · forecast SAS121–109 · missed margin by 21
  2. 20%NOP beat HOU133–128Dec 18, 2025-26 · forecast HOU125–113 · missed margin by 17
  3. 23%NOP beat PHI123–115Jan 10, 2024-25 · forecast PHI116–105 · missed margin by 19
  4. 24%NOP beat MIN119–115Feb 6, 2025-26 · forecast MIN122–112 · missed margin by 14
  5. 25%NOP beat MIN119–115Mar 19, 2024-25 · forecast MIN117–107 · missed margin by 14

Most unexpected NOP losses

  1. 27%SAS beat NOP111–109Apr 5, 2023-24 · forecast NOP112–102 · missed margin by 12
  2. 30%MEM beat NOP115–113Dec 19, 2023-24 · forecast NOP120–112 · missed margin by 10
  3. 30%IND beat NOP129–122Nov 7, 2022-23 · forecast NOP119–111 · missed margin by 15
  4. 31%ATL beat NOP126–111Nov 3, 2024-25 · forecast NOP118–111 · missed margin by 22
  5. 32%CLE beat NOP116–95Mar 13, 2023-24 · forecast NOP114–107 · missed margin by 28

Largest margin misses

  1. 61%LAL beat NOP133–89Dec 7, 2023-24 · forecast LAL115–112 · missed margin by 41
  2. 28%NOP beat SAC136–104Feb 5, 2022-23 · forecast SAC118–109 · missed margin by 41
  3. 60%NOP beat GSW128–83Nov 21, 2022-23 · forecast NOP117–113 · missed margin by 41
  4. 66%DET beat NOP127–81Mar 17, 2024-25 · forecast DET121–114 · missed margin by 39
  5. 51%NOP beat SAC129–93Nov 20, 2023-24 · forecast SAC116–114 · missed margin by 38

Recent results the forecast got wrong

  1. 44%NOP beat MEM135–134Nov 2, 2026-27 · forecast MEM120–118 · missed margin by 3
  2. 36%NOP beat ATL121–99Oct 31, 2026-27 · forecast ATL123–118 · missed margin by 27
  3. 44%UTA beat NOP120–119Oct 23, 2026-27 · forecast NOP123–121 · missed margin by 3
  4. 41%IND beat NOP123–120Oct 21, 2026-27 · forecast NOP124–121 · missed margin by 6
  5. 44%SAC beat NOP117–113Apr 3, 2025-26 · forecast NOP115–113 · missed margin by 6

Definitions

Expected wins
The sum of the team's pregame win probabilities over the games in the sample (home: the stored home win probability; road: one minus it).
Wins vs expectation
Actual wins minus expected wins. It describes results relative to the forecasts, not why they differed.
Margin error
The team's actual margin minus its forecast margin, in points. Positive means the team did better than forecast.
Error variability
The sample standard deviation of margin errors. Higher means the forecasts for this team's games were less consistent.
Winner picked
The share of the team's games in which the forecast winner won, whichever team that was. Teams play different mixes of close and lopsided games, so this alone is not a fair measure of how hard a team is to forecast.
Average margin miss
The mean absolute margin error. This is the headline measure of how hard a team's games were for this model to forecast.
Average margin error
The mean signed margin error. Consistently positive means the model underrated the team in this sample; negative, overrated.
Brier score
The mean squared difference between the team's pregame win probability and the result (1 for a win, 0 for a loss). It rewards confident correct forecasts and penalises confident wrong ones.
Intervals and samples
Ranges are 90% bootstrap intervals (1,000 resamples of the team's games). Under 20 games no ranking is shown; 20 to 59 games is exploratory; 60 or more is roughly a full season.

More on how forecasts are made and tested: Methodology.