2026-27 · Regular Season · Final
Sacramento Kings at Memphis Grizzlies
Saturday, October 31, 2026 · tip-off 8:00 PM ET
SAC 0–5@MEM 5–0 records going into the game NBA.com recap ↗
Forecast and result
| Team | Projected | Final | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAC Sacramento Kings | 119 | 105 | −14 |
| MEM Memphis Grizzlies (home) | 122 | 136 | +14 |
Forecast: Memphis Grizzlies to win, 59% win probability, projected margin 3.
Inside the Forecast
How the inputs are builtWhy the model leans MEM
- Home court+2.1 MEMWhat the model gives the home team on an average night.
- Team strength+2.2 MEMElo MEM 1408, SAC 1333; season margin MEM −1.6, SAC −11.7.
- Recent form+1.5 SACLast 10 games, per 100 possessions: MEM scores 111.9 and allows 117.8; SAC scores 109.8 and allows 121.2.
Together: MEM by 3, a 59% chance. Smaller inputs make up the rest; the chart below has all of them.
Team-by-team notes from the box scores
MEM is 5–0, winning by 12 a game on average (scoring 118, allowing 106). Last season they were a −6 team, which still counts for 75% of their season margin. Their offense shoots 53% eFG against a 55% league average, which alone costs about 2.4 points per 100 possessions. Smaller factors: offensive rebounding −2.0, getting to the line −1.2. Their defense lets opponents rebound 39% of their misses (league 26%), which alone costs about 6 points per 100 possessions. Smaller factors: shooting defense −3. Quinten Post (8 ppg) is out.
SAC is 0–5, losing by 17 a game on average (scoring 110, allowing 127). Last season they were a −10 team, which still counts for 75% of their season margin. Their offense turns it over on 14.0% of possessions (league 12.2%), which alone costs about 2.6 points per 100 possessions. Smaller factors: shooting −1.6, offensive rebounding +1.0. Their defense lets opponents shoot 58% eFG against a 55% league average, which alone costs about 6 points per 100 possessions. Keegan Murray (7 ppg) is out.
Written from the numbers in Built from the box scores, using only values that rebuild exactly.
How the projected margin was built
Points of home margin. Right of zero favors MEM; left favors SAC.
Every input the model received, with its effect
| Input | SAC | MEM | Effect, pts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elo ratingMargin-of-victory Elo; 1500 is average. | 1333 | 1408 | +0.2 |
| Elo gap, home minus road, incl. home court | +145 | +1.6 | |
| Season scoring marginPoints per game, blended with last season early in the year. | −11.7 | −1.6 | +1.0 |
| Games played this season | 5 | 5 | −0.7 |
| Offensive rating, last 10Points scored per 100 possessions. | 109.8 | 111.9 | +0.3 |
| Defensive rating, last 10Points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better. | 121.2 | 117.8 | −0.7 |
| Combined pace, last 10Possessions per game, both teams. | 102.6 | −1.1 | |
| Rotation points missingPoints per game of rotation players listed Out or Doubtful. | 7.0 | 7.6 | +0.0 |
| Rest days | 2 | 2 | −0.0 |
| Second night of a back-to-back | No | No | +0.0 |
All 21 raw inputs, in points for each team
| Input | Value | MEM pts | SAC pts | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Defensive rating, last 10 (home) | 117.8 | +0.18 | +2.27 | −2.10 |
| Elo gap incl. home court | 144.7 | +0.80 | −0.81 | +1.62 |
| Defensive rating, last 10 (away) | 121.2 | +1.49 | +0.08 | +1.41 |
| Season scoring margin (away) | -11.7 | +0.59 | −0.79 | +1.39 |
| Combined pace, last 10 | 102.6 | +4.36 | +5.45 | −1.09 |
| Offensive rating, last 10 (away) | 109.8 | −0.06 | −0.70 | +0.64 |
| Games played (away) | 5.0 | +0.20 | +0.82 | −0.62 |
| Elo rating (away) | 1333.0 | +0.27 | −0.25 | +0.52 |
| Rotation points missing (home) | 7.6 | +0.46 | −0.02 | +0.48 |
| Rotation points missing (away) | 7.0 | +0.07 | +0.51 | −0.44 |
| Season scoring margin (home) | -1.6 | −0.13 | +0.22 | −0.35 |
| Offensive rating, last 10 (home) | 111.9 | −0.38 | −0.03 | −0.34 |
| Elo rating (home) | 1407.7 | −0.10 | +0.21 | −0.31 |
| Home series wins | 0.0 | +0.27 | +0.03 | +0.24 |
| Games played (home) | 5.0 | −0.05 | +0.04 | −0.09 |
| Series pressure | 0.0 | +0.04 | +0.00 | +0.03 |
| Rest days (home) | 2.0 | −0.01 | +0.02 | −0.03 |
| Rest days (away) | 2.0 | +0.00 | +0.02 | −0.02 |
| Back-to-back (home) | 0 | +0.01 | −0.01 | +0.02 |
| Elimination game | 0 | ±0.00 | −0.01 | +0.01 |
| Back-to-back (away) | 0 | ±0.00 | ±0.00 | ±0.00 |
| Baseline (average output) | 114.4 | 112.4 | +2.10 |
Built from the box scores
How the breakdowns workWhere each input came from. Open a row to see the games and box-score stats behind it. A breakdown is shown only when rebuilding it from the stored stats gives exactly the number the model received.
Elo ratingSAC1333MEM14081.8 pts toward MEM
Updated after every game from the final score only: wins, losses and margin. Each season starts by keeping 75% of last season's distance from the 1500 average.
SAC1333
- Ended last season at 1326 → started this one at 1369
- This season's 5 games: −36.4
- L@LAC96–121−6.8
- LPOR120–128−6.0
- LMEM112–123−14.2
- L@SAS103–130−2.6
- L@NOP120–132−6.8
MEM1408
- Ended last season at 1273 → started this one at 1330
- This season's 5 games: +78.1
- WUTA123–103+12.8
- W@GSW111–108+9.2
- W@SAC123–112+14.2
- W@UTA110–105+7.8
- W@POR124–103+34.1
Season scoring marginSAC−11.7MEM−1.60.3 pts toward MEM
Points scored minus points allowed per game this season, mixed with last season's margin until 20 games are played.
SAC−11.7
Scores 110.2, allows 126.8 over 5 games: −16.6 a game.
25% this season (−16.6) + 75% last season (−10.0) = −11.7
MEM−1.6
Scores 118.2, allows 106.2 over 5 games: +12.0 a game.
25% this season (+12.0) + 75% last season (−6.1) = −1.6
Offensive rating, last 10SAC109.8MEM111.90.3 pts toward MEM
Points scored per 100 possessions. Split into the four factors: right of center helps the team, left hurts, in points per 100 possessions compared with the league average (2025-26: 114.6).
SAC109.8scored, −4.8 vs league
| Factor | SAC | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 53.5% | 54.5% | −1.6 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 14.0% | 12.2% | −2.6 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 28.4% | 26.1% | +1.0 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.191 | 0.210 | −0.5 | |
| Everything else | −1.0 |
MEM111.9scored, −2.7 vs league
| Factor | MEM | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 52.9% | 54.5% | −2.4 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 11.7% | 12.2% | +0.8 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 21.6% | 26.1% | −2.0 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.169 | 0.210 | −1.2 | |
| Everything else | +2.2 |
Defensive rating, last 10SAC121.2MEM117.80.7 pts toward SAC
Points allowed per 100 possessions, built from what opponents did in those games. Bars point right when the defense held opponents below average. Split into the four factors: right of center helps the team, left hurts, in points per 100 possessions compared with the league average (2025-26: 114.6).
SAC121.2allowed, +6.6 vs league
| Factor | Opponents | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 58.3% | 54.5% | −5.7 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 12.6% | 12.2% | +0.6 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 25.9% | 26.1% | +0.1 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.228 | 0.210 | −0.5 | |
| Everything else | −1.0 |
MEM117.8allowed, +3.3 vs league
| Factor | Opponents | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 56.6% | 54.5% | −3.2 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 12.8% | 12.2% | +0.9 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 38.9% | 26.1% | −5.7 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.208 | 0.210 | +0.1 | |
| Everything else | +4.7 |
Pace, last 10average 102.61.1 pts toward SAC
Possessions per 48 minutes. The model uses the average of the two teams. Faster games mean more points for both sides, so pace mostly moves the projected total, not the margin.
SAC 101.8 and MEM 103.5 → average 102.6 (league 2025-26: 100.0)
Rotation points missingSAC7.0MEM7.6no effect on the margin
Points per game of rotation players (two or more of the last 10 games this season, 15+ minutes) listed Out or Doubtful on the official injury report.
SAC7.0pts/g missing
| Player | Pts | Min | Games |
|---|---|---|---|
| Keegan Murray | 7.0 | 27.2 | 2 |
Source: official injury report, 2026-10-31 17:30 ET. 8 rotation players.
MEM7.6pts/g missing
| Player | Pts | Min | Games |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quinten Post | 7.6 | 15.1 | 5 |
Source: official injury report, 2026-10-31 17:30 ET. 11 rotation players.
RestSAC2 daysMEM2 daysno effect on the margin
Days since the team's previous game, capped at 5. One day means the second night of a back-to-back.
SAC2days
Last played Oct 29 against NOP.
MEM2days
Last played Oct 29 against POR.
The last 10 games behind these numbers, box-score totals
SAC
| Date | Opp | Score | FG | 3P | FT | TOV | OREB | Off | Def | Pace |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29 | @NOP | 120–132 | 46-88 | 12-37 | 16-20 | 25 | 7 | 108.1 | 118.9 | 111.0 |
| Oct 27 | @SAS | 103–130 | 40-93 | 13-37 | 10-13 | 13 | 13 | 103.0 | 130.0 | 100.0 |
| Oct 25 | MEM | 112–123 | 44-95 | 10-33 | 14-22 | 13 | 16 | 113.1 | 121.8 | 100.0 |
| Oct 23 | POR | 120–128 | 42-91 | 8-32 | 28-30 | 14 | 10 | 113.2 | 120.8 | 106.0 |
| Oct 21 | @LAC | 96–121 | 36-85 | 8-28 | 16-28 | 17 | 11 | 91.4 | 116.3 | 104.5 |
| Apr 12 | @POR | 110–122 | 40-83 | 7-21 | 23-31 | 16 | 15 | 112.2 | 123.2 | 98.5 |
| Apr 10 | GSW | 124–118 | 41-89 | 17-44 | 25-34 | 16 | 16 | 121.6 | 115.7 | 102.0 |
| Apr 7 | @GSW | 105–110 | 41-87 | 11-31 | 12-17 | 14 | 13 | 111.7 | 114.6 | 95.0 |
| Apr 5 | LAC | 109–138 | 45-85 | 9-32 | 10-20 | 20 | 11 | 105.8 | 135.3 | 102.5 |
| Apr 3 | NOP | 117–113 | 46-90 | 10-33 | 15-20 | 14 | 11 | 118.2 | 115.3 | 98.5 |
MEM
| Date | Opp | Score | FG | 3P | FT | TOV | OREB | Off | Def | Pace |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29 | @POR | 124–103 | 47-102 | 18-42 | 12-12 | 10 | 15 | 121.6 | 101.0 | 102.0 |
| Oct 26 | @UTA | 110–105 | 37-85 | 16-37 | 20-22 | 12 | 6 | 110.0 | 104.0 | 100.5 |
| Oct 25 | @SAC | 123–112 | 42-96 | 15-41 | 24-27 | 12 | 19 | 121.8 | 113.1 | 100.0 |
| Oct 23 | @GSW | 111–108 | 40-86 | 15-39 | 16-22 | 25 | 18 | 112.1 | 108.0 | 99.5 |
| Oct 21 | UTA | 123–103 | 44-93 | 13-34 | 22-28 | 13 | 15 | 118.3 | 99.0 | 104.0 |
| Apr 12 | @HOU | 101–132 | 39-95 | 13-49 | 10-10 | 13 | 3 | 98.1 | 128.2 | 103.0 |
| Apr 10 | @UTA | 101–147 | 41-109 | 11-52 | 8-9 | 19 | 4 | 83.5 | 121.5 | 121.0 |
| Apr 8 | @DEN | 119–136 | 42-92 | 19-50 | 16-23 | 6 | 3 | 119.0 | 136.0 | 100.0 |
| Apr 6 | CLE | 126–142 | 45-94 | 29-59 | 7-10 | 13 | 3 | 122.3 | 137.9 | 103.0 |
| Apr 5 | @MIL | 115–131 | 38-92 | 17-46 | 22-28 | 14 | 9 | 112.7 | 129.7 | 101.5 |
Off and Def are points scored and allowed per 100 possessions in each game; their averages are the 10-game ratings above. OREB is missing (–) where the source data didn't record it.
The result against the forecast
2026-27 surprise gamesSurprise is measured against this model's forecast, not against what other observers expected. Outcome surprise is −ln(winner's pregame probability): 0.69 for a coin flip, 2.3 for a 10% winner.
Team box score
What happened in the game. These numbers are not used by the forecast, and they are not offered as the reason it missed.
| Team stat | SAC | MEM |
|---|---|---|
| Final score | 105 | 136 |
| Field goals | 35–86 · 40.7% | 47–85 · 55.3% |
| Three-pointers | 11–38 · 28.9% | 19–38 · 50.0% |
| Free throws | 24–29 · 82.8% | 23–27 · 85.2% |
| Rebounds | 33 | 45 |
| Assists | 25 | 30 |
| Turnovers | 13 | 17 |
| Steals | 9 | 5 |
| Blocks | 3 | 6 |
How the model does with these teams over time: Sacramento Kings · Memphis Grizzlies
Where the forecast differed from the result
| Measure | Forecast | Actual | Actual − forecast |
|---|---|---|---|
| Home margin (MEM) | +3 | +31 | +28 |
| Total points | 241 | 241 | ±0 |
| SAC points | 119 | 105 | −14 |
| MEM points | 122 | 136 | +14 |
Recent form before this game
Previous meetings
| Date | Matchup | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 25 2026-27 | MEM at SAC | MEM 123 – 112 SAC |
| Feb 23 2025-26 | SAC at MEM | SAC 123 – 114 MEM |
| Feb 4 2025-26 | MEM at SAC | MEM 129 – 125 SAC |
| Nov 30 2025-26 | MEM at SAC | MEM 115 – 107 SAC |
| Nov 20 2025-26 | SAC at MEM | SAC 96 – 137 MEM |