← All teams

Western Conference · 2026-27

Memphis Grizzlies MEM

6–3
2026-27 record
1405
Elo rating
with the forecast of Nov 6
112.8
Offensive rating
last 10 games
110.5
Defensive rating
last 10, lower is better
101.9
Pace
possessions per game
237 of 345 forecasts for MEM games picked the winner.

Hover the ball to see a season.

Every graded MEM game, one dot each, oldest at the center. 237 of 345 forecasts picked the winner (colored dots).

Elo rating, recent games

MEM pregame Elo over its last 82 games with a forecast, from 1501 to 1405 1250130013501400145015001550 new season 1405 Nov 2025 Nov 2026
Pregame Elo stored with each of MEM's last 82 forecasts. Dashed: 1500, the long-run average.

Upcoming

Schedule
Nov 9 7:30 PM ET
MEM Memphis Grizzlies 6–3 –
@TOR Toronto Raptors (home) 5–4 –
Forecast coming Details
Nov 11 8:00 PM ET
DEN Denver Nuggets 5–3 –
@MEM Memphis Grizzlies (home) 6–3 –
Forecast coming Details
Nov 13 8:00 PM ET
MEM Memphis Grizzlies 6–3 –
@NOP New Orleans Pelicans (home) 4–6 –
Forecast coming Details
Nov 14 8:00 PM ET
BKN Brooklyn Nets 2–8 –
@MEM Memphis Grizzlies (home) 6–3 –
Forecast coming Details

Recent results

Archive
Nov 6 Final
OKC Oklahoma City Thunder 116 128
@MEM Memphis Grizzlies (home) 112 97
OKC 62% 38% MEM
✓ Picked OKC Details
Nov 4 Final
IND Indiana Pacers 114 107
@MEM Memphis Grizzlies (home) 120 103
IND 32% 68% MEM
Upset✗ Picked MEM Details
Nov 2 Final
NOP New Orleans Pelicans 118 135
@MEM Memphis Grizzlies (home) 120 134
NOP 44% 56% MEM

Why: Injuries 1.5 → MEM · Pace 1.4 → NOP

✗ Picked MEM Details
Oct 31 Final
SAC Sacramento Kings 119 105
@MEM Memphis Grizzlies (home) 122 136
SAC 41% 59% MEM

Why: Elo 1.8 → MEM · Pace 1.1 → SAC

✓ Picked MEM Details
Oct 29 Final
MEM Memphis Grizzlies 112 124
@POR Portland Trail Blazers (home) 122 103
MEM 24% 76% POR

Why: Elo 5.2 → POR · Defense, last 10 2.2 → POR

Upset✗ Picked POR Details

Predictability

How closely the forecasts tracked MEM games. A team can be hard for this model to forecast whether it is good or bad: misses come from the model's limits, roster changes, missing information and ordinary game-to-game variation. Compare all 30 teams

2026-27 (in progress)

Small sample: 9 games. These figures are a running log, not a measurement, and no ranking is shown.

15.6 pts
average margin miss
90% interval 10.2 to 20.8
+6.7
average margin error
+ = better than forecast; 90% interval -2.6 to 15.6
18.2 pts
error variability
std. deviation; league margin miss 11.7
33%
winner picked
9 games involving MEM
6 / 4.4
actual / expected wins
gap +1.6
0.307
Brier score
0.25 = coin flip; lower is better

Expected and actual wins

MEM: cumulative expected wins from pregame win probabilities against actual wins 0246810 6 actual 4.4 exp. 159 Game number in sample
Solid: actual wins. Dashed: expected wins, the running sum of MEM's pregame win probability in each game.

Margin error, game by game

MEM: margin forecast error in each game, actual minus predicted -40-200+20+40 Better than forecast Worse than forecast Games in date order
Each bar is one game: MEM's actual margin minus its predicted margin, in points. Positive bars sit above the line and negative bars below it, so direction does not depend on color.

How the errors are spread

MEM: distribution of 9 margin errors; mean +6.7 points 012 -40 to -36 pts: 0 games -36 to -32 pts: 0 games -32 to -28 pts: 0 games -28 to -24 pts: 1 games -24 to -20 pts: 0 games -20 to -16 pts: 0 games -16 to -12 pts: 0 games -12 to -8 pts: 1 games -8 to -4 pts: 0 games -4 to 0 pts: 1 games 0 to 4 pts: 0 games 4 to 8 pts: 2 games 8 to 12 pts: 0 games 12 to 16 pts: 2 games 16 to 20 pts: 0 games 20 to 24 pts: 0 games 24 to 28 pts: 0 games 28 to 32 pts: 2 games 32 to 36 pts: 0 games 36 to 40 pts: 0 games mean +6.7 -40-200+20+40 worse than forecast better than forecast
Each bar counts games whose margin error fell in a 4-point range (errors beyond ±40 are in the end bars). Dashed line: the average error.

MEM against the league

Average margin miss by team, 2026-27, smallest to largest; MEM is 29 of 30 3579111315171921232527 median 11.7 UTA: 6.70 points over 10 games, 90% interval 4.4–9.2 UTA 6.7 n=10 NOP: 7.70 points over 10 games, 90% interval 4.3–11.7 NOP 7.7 n=10 CLE: 8.50 points over 10 games, 90% interval 4.8–12.8 CLE 8.5 n=10 SAS: 8.50 points over 10 games, 90% interval 6.6–10.4 SAS 8.5 n=10 PHI: 8.82 points over 11 games, 90% interval 5.73–12.36 PHI 8.8 n=11 MIL: 9.00 points over 10 games, 90% interval 5.1–13.4 MIL 9.0 n=10 LAL: 9.64 points over 11 games, 90% interval 6.27–13 LAL 9.6 n=11 PHX: 9.88 points over 8 games, 90% interval 4.12–18.25 PHX 9.9 n=8 IND: 10.20 points over 10 games, 90% interval 6.8–14 IND 10.2 n=10 LAC: 11.33 points over 9 games, 90% interval 7.33–15.56 LAC 11.3 n=9 NYK: 11.33 points over 9 games, 90% interval 7.89–14.67 NYK 11.3 n=9 SAC: 11.50 points over 10 games, 90% interval 6.9–16.2 SAC 11.5 n=10 WAS: 11.50 points over 10 games, 90% interval 6.7–16.6 WAS 11.5 n=10 DET: 11.56 points over 9 games, 90% interval 8.56–15.56 DET 11.6 n=9 BOS: 11.70 points over 10 games, 90% interval 7.4–16.7 BOS 11.7 n=10 DEN: 11.75 points over 8 games, 90% interval 6.88–16.88 DEN 11.8 n=8 BKN: 11.90 points over 10 games, 90% interval 7.6–16.7 BKN 11.9 n=10 CHI: 12.00 points over 9 games, 90% interval 6.44–18.11 CHI 12.0 n=9 MIA: 12.00 points over 10 games, 90% interval 7.8–16 MIA 12.0 n=10 GSW: 12.50 points over 10 games, 90% interval 8.4–17.4 GSW 12.5 n=10 MIN: 12.55 points over 11 games, 90% interval 7.36–18.18 MIN 12.6 n=11 HOU: 13.10 points over 10 games, 90% interval 8.9–17.9 HOU 13.1 n=10 ATL: 13.55 points over 11 games, 90% interval 6.64–21.55 ATL 13.6 n=11 ORL: 13.67 points over 9 games, 90% interval 9.67–18.22 ORL 13.7 n=9 OKC: 14.20 points over 10 games, 90% interval 8.3–20.5 OKC 14.2 n=10 DAL: 14.70 points over 10 games, 90% interval 9.7–19.8 DAL 14.7 n=10 POR: 15.11 points over 9 games, 90% interval 8.89–22 POR 15.1 n=9 TOR: 15.33 points over 9 games, 90% interval 9.78–21.33 TOR 15.3 n=9 MEM: 15.56 points over 9 games, 90% interval 10.22–20.78 MEM 15.6 n=9 CHA: 17.30 points over 10 games, 90% interval 9.3–26.3 CHA 17.3 n=10 average margin miss, points (lower = easier to forecast)
Dots: average absolute margin error per team. Lines: 90% bootstrap intervals; overlapping lines mean the difference between those teams is not clear in this sample. Hollow dots: fewer than 20 games.
All 9 games in this sample
DateOpponentMEM win prob.ProjectedFinalPickMargin error
Nov 6 vs OKC 38% 112–116 L 97–128 ✓correct −27
Nov 4 vs IND 68% 120–114 L 103–107 ✗missed −10
Nov 2 vs NOP 56% 120–118 L 134–135 ✗missed −3
Oct 31 vs SAC 59% 122–119 W 136–105 ✓correct +28
Oct 29 at POR 24% 112–122 W 124–103 ✗missed +31
Oct 26 at UTA 47% 121–122 W 110–105 ✗missed +6
Oct 25 at SAC 44% 117–119 W 123–112 ✗missed +13
Oct 23 at GSW 39% 117–121 W 111–108 ✗missed +7
Oct 21 vs UTA 64% 127–122 W 123–103 ✓correct +15

2025-26

Across 80 graded games, MEM finished an average of 3.9 points worse than the forecast margin (90% interval -6.4 to -1.5).

10.7 pts
average margin miss
90% interval 9.1 to 12.4; 10th smallest of 30
−3.9
average margin error
+ = better than forecast; 90% interval -6.4 to -1.5
13.8 pts
error variability
std. deviation; league margin miss 11.4
73%
winner picked
80 games involving MEM
24 / 35.3
actual / expected wins
gap −11.3
0.203
Brier score
0.25 = coin flip; lower is better

Expected and actual wins

MEM: cumulative expected wins from pregame win probabilities against actual wins 010203040 24 actual 35.3 exp. 14080 Game number in sample
Solid: actual wins. Dashed: expected wins, the running sum of MEM's pregame win probability in each game.

Margin error, game by game

MEM: margin forecast error in each game, actual minus predicted -60-300+30+60 Better than forecast Worse than forecast Games in date order
Each bar is one game: MEM's actual margin minus its predicted margin, in points. Positive bars sit above the line and negative bars below it, so direction does not depend on color.

How the errors are spread

MEM: distribution of 80 margin errors; mean -3.9 points 0714 -40 to -36 pts: 2 games -36 to -32 pts: 0 games -32 to -28 pts: 0 games -28 to -24 pts: 2 games -24 to -20 pts: 3 games -20 to -16 pts: 3 games -16 to -12 pts: 8 games -12 to -8 pts: 10 games -8 to -4 pts: 14 games -4 to 0 pts: 9 games 0 to 4 pts: 8 games 4 to 8 pts: 9 games 8 to 12 pts: 3 games 12 to 16 pts: 3 games 16 to 20 pts: 4 games 20 to 24 pts: 0 games 24 to 28 pts: 1 games 28 to 32 pts: 0 games 32 to 36 pts: 0 games 36 to 40 pts: 1 games mean -3.9 -40-200+20+40 worse than forecast better than forecast
Each bar counts games whose margin error fell in a 4-point range (errors beyond ±40 are in the end bars). Dashed line: the average error.

MEM against the league

Average margin miss by team, 2025-26, smallest to largest; MEM is 10 of 30 79111315 median 11.5 NOP: 9.60 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.48–10.84 NOP 9.6 n=82 DAL: 9.67 points over 81 games, 90% interval 8.4–11.09 DAL 9.7 n=81 DET: 10.16 points over 95 games, 90% interval 8.67–11.82 DET 10.2 n=95 IND: 10.32 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.74–12.01 IND 10.3 n=82 SAS: 10.41 points over 103 games, 90% interval 9.12–11.82 SAS 10.4 n=103 GSW: 10.43 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.06–11.98 GSW 10.4 n=82 CLE: 10.56 points over 100 games, 90% interval 9.19–11.94 CLE 10.6 n=100 POR: 10.59 points over 87 games, 90% interval 9.22–12.23 POR 10.6 n=87 DEN: 10.67 points over 88 games, 90% interval 9.09–12.41 DEN 10.7 n=88 MEM: 10.72 points over 80 games, 90% interval 9.05–12.4 MEM 10.7 n=80 ORL: 10.76 points over 86 games, 90% interval 9.19–12.45 ORL 10.8 n=86 PHX: 10.87 points over 86 games, 90% interval 9.27–12.48 PHX 10.9 n=86 HOU: 10.93 points over 88 games, 90% interval 9.52–12.23 HOU 10.9 n=88 LAL: 11.25 points over 92 games, 90% interval 9.9–12.52 LAL 11.3 n=92 OKC: 11.48 points over 96 games, 90% interval 9.74–13.17 OKC 11.5 n=96 LAC: 11.50 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.93–13.07 LAC 11.5 n=82 CHI: 11.59 points over 82 games, 90% interval 10.02–13.22 CHI 11.6 n=82 SAC: 11.59 points over 82 games, 90% interval 10.06–13.29 SAC 11.6 n=82 PHI: 11.63 points over 93 games, 90% interval 10.02–13.37 PHI 11.6 n=93 BOS: 11.89 points over 89 games, 90% interval 10.47–13.35 BOS 11.9 n=89 WAS: 12.07 points over 82 games, 90% interval 10.65–13.57 WAS 12.1 n=82 UTA: 12.18 points over 82 games, 90% interval 10.29–14.11 UTA 12.2 n=82 BKN: 12.48 points over 82 games, 90% interval 10.94–14.34 BKN 12.5 n=82 MIN: 12.49 points over 94 games, 90% interval 11.06–14.07 MIN 12.5 n=94 ATL: 12.58 points over 88 games, 90% interval 10.92–14.49 ATL 12.6 n=88 TOR: 12.62 points over 89 games, 90% interval 11.03–14.24 TOR 12.6 n=89 MIA: 12.63 points over 82 games, 90% interval 11.02–14.3 MIA 12.6 n=82 MIL: 12.80 points over 82 games, 90% interval 11.06–14.59 MIL 12.8 n=82 CHA: 13.29 points over 82 games, 90% interval 11.57–15.17 CHA 13.3 n=82 NYK: 13.45 points over 99 games, 90% interval 11.64–15.37 NYK 13.4 n=99 average margin miss, points (lower = easier to forecast)
Dots: average absolute margin error per team. Lines: 90% bootstrap intervals; overlapping lines mean the difference between those teams is not clear in this sample. Hollow dots: fewer than 20 games.
All 80 games in this sample
DateOpponentMEM win prob.ProjectedFinalPickMargin error
Apr 12 at HOU 11% 106–124 L 101–132 ✓correct −13
Apr 10 at UTA 66% 124–118 L 101–147 ✗missed −52
Apr 8 at DEN 8% 110–132 L 119–136 ✓correct +5
Apr 6 vs CLE 27% 114–123 L 126–142 ✓correct −7
Apr 5 at MIL 41% 113–116 L 115–131 ✓correct −13
Apr 3 vs TOR 22% 113–124 L 96–128 ✓correct −21
Apr 1 vs NYK 20% 107–119 L 119–130 ✓correct +1
Mar 30 vs PHX 27% 110–119 L 105–131 ✓correct −17
Mar 28 vs CHI 39% 116–120 W 125–124 ✗missed +5
Mar 27 vs HOU 34% 113–119 L 109–119 ✓correct −4
Mar 25 vs SAS 17% 113–127 L 98–123 ✓correct −11
Mar 23 at ATL 20% 113–125 L 107–146 ✓correct −27
Mar 21 at CHA 17% 108–122 L 101–124 ✓correct −9
Mar 20 vs BOS 24% 108–118 L 112–117 ✓correct +5
Mar 18 vs DEN 29% 118–126 W 125–118 ✗missed +15
Mar 16 at CHI 44% 116–118 L 107–132 ✓correct −23
Mar 13 at DET 22% 110–121 L 110–126 ✓correct −5
Mar 12 vs DAL 53% 118–117 L 112–120 ✗missed −9
Mar 10 at PHI 47% 117–118 L 129–139 ✓correct −9
Mar 9 at BKN 61% 117–113 L 115–126 ✗missed −15
Mar 7 vs LAC 42% 114–117 L 120–123 ✓correct ±0
Mar 4 vs POR 42% 117–120 L 114–122 ✓correct −5
Mar 3 at MIN 26% 114–123 L 110–117 ✓correct +2
Mar 1 at IND 71% 121–113 W 125–106 ✓correct +11
Feb 27 at DAL 53% 119–118 W 124–105 ✓correct +18
Feb 25 vs GSW 47% 119–120 L 112–133 ✓correct −20
Feb 23 vs SAC 71% 123–115 L 114–123 ✗missed −17
Feb 21 at MIA 29% 114–122 L 120–136 ✓correct −8
Feb 20 vs UTA 67% 120–114 W 123–114 ✓correct +3
Feb 11 at DEN 36% 112–117 L 116–122 ✓correct −1
Feb 9 at GSW 31% 114–121 L 113–114 ✓correct +6
Feb 7 at POR 39% 116–120 L 115–122 ✓correct −3
Feb 6 at POR 36% 115–120 L 115–135 ✓correct −15
Feb 4 at SAC 53% 115–114 W 129–125 ✓correct +3
Feb 2 vs MIN 27% 111–120 W 137–128 ✗missed +18
Jan 31 vs MIN 29% 111–119 L 114–131 ✓correct −9
Jan 30 at NOP 44% 113–115 L 106–114 ✓correct −6
Jan 28 vs CHA 39% 111–115 L 97–112 ✓correct −11
Jan 26 at HOU 29% 109–117 L 99–108 ✓correct −1
Jan 23 vs NOP 67% 119–113 L 127–133 ✗missed −12
Jan 21 vs ATL 56% 117–115 L 122–124 ✗missed −4
Jan 11 vs BKN 67% 116–110 W 103–98 ✓correct −1
Jan 9 vs OKC 29% 115–123 L 116–117 ✓correct +7
Jan 7 vs PHX 42% 116–119 L 98–117 ✓correct −16
Jan 6 vs SAS 34% 115–121 W 106–105 ✗missed +7
Jan 4 at LAL 47% 118–119 L 114–120 ✓correct −5
Jan 2 at LAL 56% 118–116 L 121–128 ✗missed −9
Dec 30 vs PHI 61% 117–113 L 136–139 ✗missed −7
Dec 28 at WAS 74% 123–114 L 112–116 ✗missed −13
Dec 26 vs MIL 69% 118–111 W 125–104 ✓correct +14
Dec 23 at UTA 74% 122–113 W 137–128 ✓correct ±0
Dec 22 at OKC 15% 108–123 L 103–119 ✓correct −1
Dec 20 vs WAS 85% 123–108 L 122–130 ✗missed −23
Dec 17 at MIN 29% 111–119 W 116–110 ✗missed +14
Dec 15 at LAC 56% 115–113 W 121–103 ✓correct +16
Dec 12 vs UTA 71% 120–112 L 126–130 ✗missed −12
Dec 7 vs POR 67% 119–113 W 119–96 ✓correct +17
Dec 5 vs LAC 53% 115–114 W 107–98 ✓correct +8
Dec 2 at SAS 47% 116–117 L 119–126 ✓correct −6
Nov 30 at SAC 58% 117–114 W 115–107 ✓correct +5
Nov 28 at LAC 53% 115–114 W 112–107 ✓correct +4
Nov 26 at NOP 61% 118–114 W 133–128 ✓correct +1
Nov 24 vs DEN 47% 116–117 L 115–125 ✓correct −9
Nov 22 at DAL 47% 114–115 W 102–96 ✗missed +7
Nov 20 vs SAC 47% 115–116 W 137–96 ✗missed +42
Nov 18 at SAS 31% 113–120 L 101–111 ✓correct −3
Nov 15 at CLE 26% 115–124 L 100–108 ✓correct +1
Nov 12 at BOS 29% 110–118 L 95–131 ✓correct −28
Nov 11 at NYK 31% 115–122 L 120–133 ✓correct −6
Nov 9 vs OKC 29% 115–123 L 100–114 ✓correct −6
Nov 7 vs DAL 59% 120–117 W 118–104 ✓correct +11
Nov 5 vs HOU 44% 114–116 L 109–124 ✓correct −13
Nov 3 vs DET 42% 116–119 L 106–114 ✓correct −5
Nov 2 at TOR 56% 120–118 L 104–117 ✗missed −15
Oct 31 vs LAL 53% 118–117 L 112–117 ✗missed −6
Oct 29 at PHX 58% 118–115 W 114–113 ✓correct −2
Oct 27 at GSW 36% 114–119 L 118–131 ✓correct −8
Oct 25 vs IND 44% 115–117 W 128–103 ✗missed +27
Oct 24 vs MIA 67% 120–114 L 114–146 ✗missed −38
Oct 22 vs NOP 80% 121–109 W 128–122 ✓correct −6

2024-25

11.8 pts
average margin miss
90% interval 10.1 to 13.7; 23rd smallest of 30
+2.3
average margin error
+ = better than forecast; 90% interval -0.5 to 4.8
15.4 pts
error variability
std. deviation; league margin miss 11.0
71%
winner picked
86 games involving MEM
48 / 46.0
actual / expected wins
gap +2.0
0.200
Brier score
0.25 = coin flip; lower is better

Expected and actual wins

MEM: cumulative expected wins from pregame win probabilities against actual wins 01020304050 48 actual 46.0 exp. 14386 Game number in sample
Solid: actual wins. Dashed: expected wins, the running sum of MEM's pregame win probability in each game.

Margin error, game by game

MEM: margin forecast error in each game, actual minus predicted -50-250+25+50 Better than forecast Worse than forecast Games in date order
Each bar is one game: MEM's actual margin minus its predicted margin, in points. Positive bars sit above the line and negative bars below it, so direction does not depend on color.

How the errors are spread

MEM: distribution of 86 margin errors; mean +2.3 points 0713 -40 to -36 pts: 1 games -36 to -32 pts: 1 games -32 to -28 pts: 0 games -28 to -24 pts: 0 games -24 to -20 pts: 0 games -20 to -16 pts: 1 games -16 to -12 pts: 9 games -12 to -8 pts: 10 games -8 to -4 pts: 6 games -4 to 0 pts: 13 games 0 to 4 pts: 12 games 4 to 8 pts: 5 games 8 to 12 pts: 4 games 12 to 16 pts: 9 games 16 to 20 pts: 6 games 20 to 24 pts: 1 games 24 to 28 pts: 3 games 28 to 32 pts: 2 games 32 to 36 pts: 1 games 36 to 40 pts: 2 games mean +2.3 -40-200+20+40 worse than forecast better than forecast
Each bar counts games whose margin error fell in a 4-point range (errors beyond ±40 are in the end bars). Dashed line: the average error.

MEM against the league

Average margin miss by team, 2024-25, smallest to largest; MEM is 23 of 30 79111315 median 11.0 CHA: 9.26 points over 82 games, 90% interval 7.61–10.89 CHA 9.3 n=82 PHX: 9.49 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.11–10.93 PHX 9.5 n=82 HOU: 9.50 points over 88 games, 90% interval 8.27–10.78 HOU 9.5 n=88 ORL: 10.00 points over 87 games, 90% interval 8.64–11.37 ORL 10.0 n=87 DET: 10.03 points over 88 games, 90% interval 8.78–11.4 DET 10.0 n=88 PHI: 10.11 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.54–11.87 PHI 10.1 n=82 UTA: 10.12 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.48–12.02 UTA 10.1 n=82 NOP: 10.21 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.57–11.82 NOP 10.2 n=82 MIL: 10.27 points over 86 games, 90% interval 8.88–11.77 MIL 10.3 n=86 IND: 10.33 points over 103 games, 90% interval 9.13–11.63 IND 10.3 n=103 SAS: 10.68 points over 80 games, 90% interval 8.99–12.45 SAS 10.7 n=80 ATL: 10.74 points over 81 games, 90% interval 9.4–12.17 ATL 10.7 n=81 BKN: 10.80 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.33–12.39 BKN 10.8 n=82 WAS: 10.84 points over 81 games, 90% interval 9.32–12.23 WAS 10.8 n=81 MIN: 10.93 points over 97 games, 90% interval 9.53–12.36 MIN 10.9 n=97 DAL: 10.99 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.71–12.43 DAL 11.0 n=82 MIA: 11.04 points over 85 games, 90% interval 9.36–12.89 MIA 11.0 n=85 CLE: 11.07 points over 91 games, 90% interval 9.54–12.6 CLE 11.1 n=91 TOR: 11.09 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.52–12.88 TOR 11.1 n=82 LAC: 11.30 points over 89 games, 90% interval 9.74–13 LAC 11.3 n=89 BOS: 11.54 points over 93 games, 90% interval 10.13–13.06 BOS 11.5 n=93 OKC: 11.69 points over 104 games, 90% interval 10.11–13.16 OKC 11.7 n=104 MEM: 11.77 points over 86 games, 90% interval 10.07–13.73 MEM 11.8 n=86 SAC: 11.77 points over 82 games, 90% interval 10.07–13.39 SAC 11.8 n=82 NYK: 11.86 points over 100 games, 90% interval 10.5–13.1 NYK 11.9 n=100 LAL: 11.89 points over 87 games, 90% interval 10.06–13.62 LAL 11.9 n=87 DEN: 11.91 points over 96 games, 90% interval 10.55–13.48 DEN 11.9 n=96 GSW: 12.33 points over 94 games, 90% interval 10.68–13.97 GSW 12.3 n=94 CHI: 12.41 points over 82 games, 90% interval 10.89–13.89 CHI 12.4 n=82 POR: 13.05 points over 82 games, 90% interval 11.32–14.91 POR 13.1 n=82 average margin miss, points (lower = easier to forecast)
Dots: average absolute margin error per team. Lines: 90% bootstrap intervals; overlapping lines mean the difference between those teams is not clear in this sample. Hollow dots: fewer than 20 games.
All 86 games in this sample
DateOpponentMEM win prob.ProjectedFinalPickMargin error
Apr 26 PO vs OKC 29% 105–114 L 115–117 ✓correct +7
Apr 24 PO vs OKC 36% 108–114 L 108–114 ✓correct ±0
Apr 22 PO at OKC 21% 108–120 L 99–118 ✓correct −7
Apr 20 PO at OKC 21% 107–119 L 80–131 ✓correct −39
Apr 13 vs DAL 54% 117–116 W 132–97 ✓correct +34
Apr 11 at DEN 31% 115–122 L 109–117 ✓correct −1
Apr 10 vs MIN 49% 111–112 L 125–141 ✓correct −15
Apr 8 at CHA 71% 120–111 W 124–100 ✓correct +15
Apr 5 at DET 33% 115–121 W 109–103 ✗missed +12
Apr 3 at MIA 46% 113–114 W 110–108 ✗missed +3
Apr 1 vs GSW 54% 115–114 L 125–134 ✗missed −10
Mar 31 vs BOS 36% 110–116 L 103–117 ✓correct −8
Mar 29 vs LAL 67% 120–114 L 127–134 ✗missed −13
Mar 27 at OKC 19% 111–124 L 104–125 ✓correct −8
Mar 25 at UTA 73% 124–114 W 140–103 ✓correct +27
Mar 21 at LAC 33% 110–116 L 108–128 ✓correct −14
Mar 19 at POR 46% 115–116 L 99–115 ✓correct −15
Mar 17 at SAC 38% 114–118 L 122–132 ✓correct −6
Mar 15 vs MIA 67% 119–113 W 125–91 ✓correct +28
Mar 14 vs CLE 49% 119–120 L 124–133 ✓correct −8
Mar 12 vs UTA 73% 124–115 W 122–115 ✓correct −2
Mar 10 vs PHX 67% 123–117 W 120–118 ✓correct −4
Mar 9 at NOP 64% 123–117 W 107–104 ✓correct −3
Mar 7 at DAL 59% 119–115 W 122–111 ✓correct +7
Mar 5 vs OKC 49% 121–122 L 103–120 ✓correct −16
Mar 3 vs ATL 73% 125–116 L 130–132 ✗missed −11
Mar 1 vs SAS 73% 124–115 L 128–130 ✗missed −11
Feb 28 vs NYK 71% 122–114 L 113–114 ✗missed −9
Feb 25 vs PHX 77% 124–113 W 151–148 ✓correct −8
Feb 23 at CLE 33% 116–122 L 123–129 ✓correct ±0
Feb 21 at ORL 51% 115–114 W 105–104 ✓correct ±0
Feb 20 at IND 51% 121–120 L 113–127 ✗missed −15
Feb 12 at LAC 41% 117–120 L 114–128 ✓correct −11
Feb 11 at PHX 61% 121–116 W 119–112 ✓correct +2
Feb 8 vs OKC 67% 120–114 L 112–125 ✗missed −19
Feb 5 at TOR 69% 121–113 W 138–107 ✓correct +23
Feb 3 vs SAS 77% 125–114 W 128–109 ✓correct +8
Feb 2 at MIL 43% 122–124 W 132–119 ✗missed +15
Jan 30 vs HOU 62% 120–116 W 120–119 ✓correct −3
Jan 27 at NYK 41% 114–117 L 106–143 ✓correct −34
Jan 25 vs UTA 79% 122–110 W 125–103 ✓correct +10
Jan 24 vs NOP 77% 123–112 W 139–126 ✓correct +2
Jan 22 vs CHA 81% 122–109 W 132–120 ✓correct −1
Jan 20 vs MIN 67% 119–113 W 108–106 ✓correct −4
Jan 17 at SAS 51% 117–116 W 140–112 ✓correct +27
Jan 15 at SAS 51% 117–116 W 129–115 ✓correct +13
Jan 13 at HOU 38% 115–119 L 118–120 ✓correct +2
Jan 11 at MIN 43% 114–116 W 127–125 ✗missed +4
Jan 9 vs HOU 69% 120–113 L 115–119 ✗missed −11
Jan 6 vs DAL 54% 119–118 W 119–104 ✓correct +14
Jan 4 at GSW 51% 117–116 L 113–121 ✗missed −9
Jan 3 at SAC 46% 116–117 L 133–138 ✓correct −4
Dec 31 at PHX 54% 120–118 W 117–112 ✓correct +3
Dec 29 at OKC 29% 113–121 L 106–130 ✓correct −16
Dec 27 at NOP 75% 122–111 W 132–124 ✓correct −3
Dec 26 vs TOR 77% 123–112 W 155–126 ✓correct +18
Dec 23 vs LAC 69% 120–113 L 110–114 ✗missed −11
Dec 21 at ATL 56% 116–113 W 128–112 ✓correct +13
Dec 19 vs GSW 62% 119–115 W 144–93 ✓correct +47
Dec 15 at LAL 59% 118–114 L 110–116 ✗missed −10
Dec 13 vs BKN 81% 123–110 W 135–119 ✓correct +3
Dec 8 at WAS 79% 124–111 W 140–112 ✓correct +15
Dec 7 at BOS 23% 110–121 W 127–121 ✗missed +17
Dec 5 vs SAC 71% 121–113 W 115–110 ✓correct −3
Dec 3 at DAL 31% 114–121 L 116–121 ✓correct +2
Dec 1 vs IND 69% 122–115 W 136–121 ✓correct +8
Nov 29 vs NOP 84% 123–108 W 120–109 ✓correct −4
Nov 27 vs DET 71% 118–110 W 131–111 ✓correct +12
Nov 25 vs POR 69% 120–113 W 123–98 ✓correct +18
Nov 23 at CHI 46% 117–118 W 142–131 ✗missed +12
Nov 20 vs PHI 69% 116–109 W 117–111 ✓correct −1
Nov 19 vs DEN 62% 118–114 L 110–122 ✗missed −16
Nov 17 vs DEN 62% 120–116 W 105–90 ✓correct +11
Nov 15 at GSW 25% 111–121 L 118–123 ✓correct +5
Nov 13 at LAL 31% 115–122 L 123–128 ✓correct +2
Nov 10 at POR 43% 114–116 W 134–89 ✗missed +47
Nov 8 vs WAS 69% 122–115 W 128–104 ✓correct +17
Nov 6 vs LAL 46% 117–119 W 131–114 ✗missed +19
Nov 4 at BKN 36% 112–117 L 104–106 ✓correct +3
Nov 2 at PHI 27% 106–115 W 124–107 ✗missed +26
Oct 31 vs MIL 36% 111–117 W 122–99 ✗missed +29
Oct 30 vs BKN 54% 114–113 L 106–119 ✗missed −14
Oct 28 vs CHI 46% 115–117 L 123–126 ✓correct −1
Oct 26 vs ORL 39% 107–112 W 124–111 ✗missed +18
Oct 25 at HOU 27% 109–118 L 108–128 ✓correct −11
Oct 23 at UTA 41% 110–113 W 126–124 ✗missed +5

2023-24

11.0 pts
average margin miss
90% interval 9.6 to 12.5; 17th smallest of 30
−2.2
average margin error
+ = better than forecast; 90% interval -4.6 to 0.2
13.6 pts
error variability
std. deviation; league margin miss 11.3
62%
winner picked
82 games involving MEM
27 / 33.4
actual / expected wins
gap −6.4
0.241
Brier score
0.25 = coin flip; lower is better

Expected and actual wins

MEM: cumulative expected wins from pregame win probabilities against actual wins 0102030 27 actual 33.4 exp. 14182 Game number in sample
Solid: actual wins. Dashed: expected wins, the running sum of MEM's pregame win probability in each game.

Margin error, game by game

MEM: margin forecast error in each game, actual minus predicted -40-200+20+40 Better than forecast Worse than forecast Games in date order
Each bar is one game: MEM's actual margin minus its predicted margin, in points. Positive bars sit above the line and negative bars below it, so direction does not depend on color.

How the errors are spread

MEM: distribution of 82 margin errors; mean -2.2 points 0816 -40 to -36 pts: 0 games -36 to -32 pts: 0 games -32 to -28 pts: 3 games -28 to -24 pts: 2 games -24 to -20 pts: 4 games -20 to -16 pts: 3 games -16 to -12 pts: 6 games -12 to -8 pts: 6 games -8 to -4 pts: 8 games -4 to 0 pts: 16 games 0 to 4 pts: 7 games 4 to 8 pts: 3 games 8 to 12 pts: 8 games 12 to 16 pts: 9 games 16 to 20 pts: 5 games 20 to 24 pts: 1 games 24 to 28 pts: 1 games 28 to 32 pts: 0 games 32 to 36 pts: 0 games 36 to 40 pts: 0 games mean -2.2 -40-200+20+40 worse than forecast better than forecast
Each bar counts games whose margin error fell in a 4-point range (errors beyond ±40 are in the end bars). Dashed line: the average error.

MEM against the league

Average margin miss by team, 2023-24, smallest to largest; MEM is 17 of 30 79111315 median 11.0 PHX: 9.80 points over 86 games, 90% interval 8.63–11.01 PHX 9.8 n=86 WAS: 9.90 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.41–11.39 WAS 9.9 n=82 DET: 9.91 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.51–11.34 DET 9.9 n=82 CHI: 9.93 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.67–11.28 CHI 9.9 n=82 GSW: 10.13 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.49–11.84 GSW 10.1 n=82 DEN: 10.16 points over 94 games, 90% interval 8.71–11.82 DEN 10.2 n=94 LAC: 10.31 points over 88 games, 90% interval 8.94–11.67 LAC 10.3 n=88 HOU: 10.49 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.09–11.87 HOU 10.5 n=82 CHA: 10.60 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.87–12.37 CHA 10.6 n=82 SAS: 10.68 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.16–12.34 SAS 10.7 n=82 TOR: 10.71 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.94–12.41 TOR 10.7 n=82 PHI: 10.78 points over 88 games, 90% interval 9.32–12.18 PHI 10.8 n=88 LAL: 10.83 points over 87 games, 90% interval 9.3–12.37 LAL 10.8 n=87 MIN: 10.89 points over 98 games, 90% interval 9.4–12.27 MIN 10.9 n=98 ORL: 10.98 points over 89 games, 90% interval 9.61–12.31 ORL 11.0 n=89 MIA: 10.99 points over 87 games, 90% interval 9.3–12.83 MIA 11.0 n=87 MEM: 11.02 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.62–12.49 MEM 11.0 n=82 POR: 11.09 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.3–12.93 POR 11.1 n=82 BKN: 11.41 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.83–13.12 BKN 11.4 n=82 ATL: 11.43 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.74–13.3 ATL 11.4 n=82 NYK: 11.46 points over 95 games, 90% interval 10.13–12.84 NYK 11.5 n=95 CLE: 11.88 points over 94 games, 90% interval 10.45–13.49 CLE 11.9 n=94 UTA: 11.94 points over 82 games, 90% interval 10.29–13.62 UTA 11.9 n=82 OKC: 12.10 points over 92 games, 90% interval 10.34–13.93 OKC 12.1 n=92 MIL: 12.23 points over 88 games, 90% interval 10.58–13.77 MIL 12.2 n=88 SAC: 12.38 points over 82 games, 90% interval 10.73–14.11 SAC 12.4 n=82 IND: 12.71 points over 99 games, 90% interval 11.15–14.27 IND 12.7 n=99 BOS: 12.86 points over 101 games, 90% interval 11.3–14.57 BOS 12.9 n=101 DAL: 13.09 points over 104 games, 90% interval 11.49–14.72 DAL 13.1 n=104 NOP: 13.56 points over 86 games, 90% interval 11.94–15.36 NOP 13.6 n=86 average margin miss, points (lower = easier to forecast)
Dots: average absolute margin error per team. Lines: 90% bootstrap intervals; overlapping lines mean the difference between those teams is not clear in this sample. Hollow dots: fewer than 20 games.
All 82 games in this sample
DateOpponentMEM win prob.ProjectedFinalPickMargin error
Apr 14 vs DEN 26% 105–120 L 111–126 ✓correct ±0
Apr 12 vs LAL 25% 108–124 L 120–123 ✓correct +13
Apr 10 at CLE 28% 108–117 L 98–110 ✓correct −3
Apr 9 vs SAS 43% 109–115 L 87–102 ✓correct −9
Apr 6 vs PHI 33% 105–116 L 96–116 ✓correct −9
Apr 5 vs DET 53% 110–111 W 108–90 ✗missed +19
Apr 3 at MIL 32% 110–117 W 111–101 ✗missed +17
Apr 1 at DET 41% 109–111 W 110–108 ✗missed +4
Mar 30 at ORL 30% 102–110 L 88–118 ✓correct −22
Mar 27 vs LAL 41% 111–118 L 124–136 ✓correct −5
Mar 25 at DEN 25% 104–115 L 103–128 ✓correct −14
Mar 22 at SAS 34% 106–112 W 99–97 ✗missed +8
Mar 20 at GSW 24% 103–115 L 116–137 ✓correct −9
Mar 18 at SAC 22% 102–115 L 111–121 ✓correct +3
Mar 16 vs OKC 41% 106–113 L 112–118 ✓correct +1
Mar 13 vs CHA 57% 106–105 L 98–110 ✗missed −13
Mar 12 vs WAS 61% 113–110 W 109–97 ✓correct +9
Mar 10 at OKC 19% 105–120 L 93–124 ✓correct −16
Mar 8 vs ATL 51% 106–108 L 92–99 ✓correct −5
Mar 6 at PHI 32% 102–109 W 115–109 ✗missed +13
Mar 4 at BKN 34% 103–109 W 106–102 ✗missed +10
Mar 2 vs POR 51% 105–107 L 100–107 ✓correct −5
Mar 1 vs POR 53% 108–109 L 92–122 ✓correct −29
Feb 28 at MIN 24% 105–117 L 101–110 ✓correct +3
Feb 26 vs BKN 53% 112–113 L 86–111 ✓correct −24
Feb 23 vs LAC 49% 114–117 L 95–101 ✓correct −3
Feb 15 vs MIL 35% 107–117 W 113–110 ✗missed +13
Feb 14 vs HOU 47% 110–114 W 121–113 ✗missed +12
Feb 12 vs NOP 41% 110–117 L 87–96 ✓correct −2
Feb 10 at CHA 51% 114–111 L 106–115 ✗missed −12
Feb 8 vs CHI 47% 109–113 L 110–118 ✓correct −4
Feb 6 at NYK 28% 104–113 L 113–123 ✓correct −1
Feb 4 at BOS 30% 106–114 L 91–131 ✓correct −32
Feb 2 vs GSW 47% 107–111 L 101–121 ✓correct −16
Feb 1 vs CLE 47% 108–112 L 101–108 ✓correct −3
Jan 29 vs SAC 41% 109–116 L 94–103 ✓correct −2
Jan 28 at IND 28% 111–120 L 110–116 ✓correct +3
Jan 26 vs ORL 49% 106–109 W 107–106 ✗missed +4
Jan 24 at MIA 32% 105–112 W 105–96 ✗missed +16
Jan 22 at TOR 25% 114–125 W 108–100 ✗missed +19
Jan 20 at CHI 35% 109–114 L 96–125 ✓correct −24
Jan 18 at MIN 22% 107–120 L 103–118 ✓correct −2
Jan 15 vs GSW 43% 110–116 W 116–107 ✗missed +15
Jan 13 vs NYK 33% 110–121 L 94–106 ✓correct −1
Jan 12 vs LAC 41% 108–115 L 119–128 ✓correct −2
Jan 9 at DAL 30% 112–120 W 120–103 ✗missed +25
Jan 7 at PHX 32% 111–118 W 121–115 ✗missed +13
Jan 5 at LAL 34% 111–117 W 127–113 ✗missed +20
Jan 3 vs TOR 49% 113–116 L 111–116 ✓correct −2
Jan 2 vs SAS 65% 119–114 W 106–98 ✓correct +3
Dec 31 vs SAC 49% 114–117 L 92–123 ✓correct −28
Dec 29 at LAC 32% 112–119 L 106–117 ✓correct −4
Dec 28 at DEN 35% 111–116 L 105–142 ✓correct −32
Dec 26 at NOP 34% 113–119 W 116–115 ✗missed +7
Dec 23 at ATL 35% 114–119 W 125–119 ✗missed +11
Dec 21 vs IND 51% 114–116 W 116–103 ✗missed +15
Dec 19 at NOP 30% 112–120 W 115–113 ✗missed +10
Dec 18 at OKC 25% 109–120 L 97–116 ✓correct −8
Dec 15 vs HOU 49% 108–111 L 96–103 ✓correct −4
Dec 13 at HOU 30% 104–112 L 104–117 ✓correct −5
Dec 11 vs DAL 57% 111–110 L 113–120 ✗missed −8
Dec 8 vs MIN 47% 107–111 L 103–127 ✓correct −20
Dec 6 at DET 43% 113–114 W 116–102 ✗missed +15
Dec 2 at PHX 35% 104–109 L 109–116 ✓correct −2
Dec 1 at DAL 35% 112–117 W 108–94 ✗missed +19
Nov 29 vs UTA 57% 113–112 W 105–91 ✓correct +13
Nov 26 vs MIN 41% 106–113 L 97–119 ✓correct −15
Nov 24 vs PHX 53% 110–111 L 89–110 ✓correct −20
Nov 22 at HOU 37% 108–112 L 91–111 ✓correct −16
Nov 19 vs BOS 49% 111–114 L 100–102 ✓correct +1
Nov 18 at SAS 51% 117–114 W 120–108 ✓correct +9
Nov 14 at LAL 37% 112–116 L 107–134 ✓correct −23
Nov 12 at LAC 32% 111–118 W 105–101 ✗missed +11
Nov 10 vs UTA 63% 117–113 L 121–127 ✗missed −10
Nov 8 vs MIA 51% 110–112 L 102–108 ✓correct −4
Nov 5 at POR 51% 115–112 W 112–100 ✓correct +9
Nov 3 at POR 51% 116–113 L 113–115 ✗missed −5
Nov 1 at UTA 47% 116–115 L 109–133 ✗missed −25
Oct 30 vs DAL 65% 118–113 L 110–125 ✗missed −20
Oct 28 at WAS 47% 118–117 L 106–113 ✗missed −8
Oct 27 vs DEN 53% 110–111 L 104–108 ✓correct −3
Oct 25 vs NOP 65% 115–110 L 104–111 ✗missed −12

2022-23

11.4 pts
average margin miss
90% interval 9.8 to 13.1; 24th smallest of 30
−1.2
average margin error
+ = better than forecast; 90% interval -3.7 to 1.3
14.7 pts
error variability
std. deviation; league margin miss 10.3
73%
winner picked
88 games involving MEM
53 / 53.1
actual / expected wins
gap −0.1
0.201
Brier score
0.25 = coin flip; lower is better

Expected and actual wins

MEM: cumulative expected wins from pregame win probabilities against actual wins 01020304050 53 actual 53.1 exp. 14488 Game number in sample
Solid: actual wins. Dashed: expected wins, the running sum of MEM's pregame win probability in each game.

Margin error, game by game

MEM: margin forecast error in each game, actual minus predicted -50-250+25+50 Better than forecast Worse than forecast Games in date order
Each bar is one game: MEM's actual margin minus its predicted margin, in points. Positive bars sit above the line and negative bars below it, so direction does not depend on color.

How the errors are spread

MEM: distribution of 88 margin errors; mean -1.2 points 0713 -40 to -36 pts: 2 games -36 to -32 pts: 0 games -32 to -28 pts: 3 games -28 to -24 pts: 1 games -24 to -20 pts: 2 games -20 to -16 pts: 1 games -16 to -12 pts: 8 games -12 to -8 pts: 8 games -8 to -4 pts: 12 games -4 to 0 pts: 8 games 0 to 4 pts: 13 games 4 to 8 pts: 7 games 8 to 12 pts: 4 games 12 to 16 pts: 8 games 16 to 20 pts: 4 games 20 to 24 pts: 3 games 24 to 28 pts: 2 games 28 to 32 pts: 1 games 32 to 36 pts: 0 games 36 to 40 pts: 1 games mean -1.2 -40-200+20+40 worse than forecast better than forecast
Each bar counts games whose margin error fell in a 4-point range (errors beyond ±40 are in the end bars). Dashed line: the average error.

MEM against the league

Average margin miss by team, 2022-23, smallest to largest; MEM is 24 of 30 68101214 median 10.2 UTA: 8.74 points over 82 games, 90% interval 7.41–10.06 UTA 8.7 n=82 DET: 8.82 points over 82 games, 90% interval 7.57–10.1 DET 8.8 n=82 HOU: 9.06 points over 82 games, 90% interval 7.78–10.33 HOU 9.1 n=82 IND: 9.06 points over 82 games, 90% interval 7.91–10.26 IND 9.1 n=82 LAL: 9.19 points over 98 games, 90% interval 8.13–10.45 LAL 9.2 n=98 TOR: 9.30 points over 82 games, 90% interval 7.98–10.65 TOR 9.3 n=82 MIA: 9.42 points over 105 games, 90% interval 8.16–10.73 MIA 9.4 n=105 CLE: 9.63 points over 87 games, 90% interval 8.48–10.79 CLE 9.6 n=87 NYK: 9.65 points over 93 games, 90% interval 8.48–10.83 NYK 9.7 n=93 ORL: 9.88 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.6–11.21 ORL 9.9 n=82 DAL: 9.90 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.27–11.59 DAL 9.9 n=82 LAC: 9.90 points over 87 games, 90% interval 8.76–11.17 LAC 9.9 n=87 WAS: 10.06 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.61–11.52 WAS 10.1 n=82 ATL: 10.20 points over 88 games, 90% interval 8.92–11.51 ATL 10.2 n=88 PHI: 10.20 points over 93 games, 90% interval 8.81–11.6 PHI 10.2 n=93 MIN: 10.21 points over 87 games, 90% interval 8.99–11.47 MIN 10.2 n=87 OKC: 10.23 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.93–11.55 OKC 10.2 n=82 DEN: 10.51 points over 102 games, 90% interval 9.1–11.93 DEN 10.5 n=102 PHX: 10.81 points over 93 games, 90% interval 9.25–12.28 PHX 10.8 n=93 NOP: 10.82 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.34–12.26 NOP 10.8 n=82 CHA: 10.84 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.38–12.3 CHA 10.8 n=82 SAC: 10.99 points over 89 games, 90% interval 9.44–12.58 SAC 11.0 n=89 GSW: 11.24 points over 95 games, 90% interval 9.8–12.77 GSW 11.2 n=95 MEM: 11.40 points over 88 games, 90% interval 9.83–13.05 MEM 11.4 n=88 POR: 11.41 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.96–12.94 POR 11.4 n=82 BKN: 11.45 points over 86 games, 90% interval 9.79–13.3 BKN 11.4 n=86 BOS: 11.54 points over 102 games, 90% interval 9.99–13.05 BOS 11.5 n=102 CHI: 11.72 points over 82 games, 90% interval 10.11–13.48 CHI 11.7 n=82 MIL: 11.77 points over 87 games, 90% interval 10.3–13.32 MIL 11.8 n=87 SAS: 12.16 points over 82 games, 90% interval 10.54–13.79 SAS 12.2 n=82 average margin miss, points (lower = easier to forecast)
Dots: average absolute margin error per team. Lines: 90% bootstrap intervals; overlapping lines mean the difference between those teams is not clear in this sample. Hollow dots: fewer than 20 games.
All 88 games in this sample
DateOpponentMEM win prob.ProjectedFinalPickMargin error
Apr 28 PO at LAL 42% 109–112 L 85–125 ✓correct −37
Apr 26 PO vs LAL 58% 112–109 W 116–99 ✓correct +14
Apr 24 PO at LAL 30% 109–117 L 111–117 ✓correct +2
Apr 22 PO at LAL 40% 110–114 L 101–111 ✓correct −6
Apr 19 PO vs LAL 68% 118–111 W 103–93 ✓correct +3
Apr 16 PO vs LAL 81% 120–106 L 112–128 ✗missed −30
Apr 9 at OKC 53% 123–122 L 100–115 ✗missed −16
Apr 7 at MIL 47% 117–118 W 137–114 ✗missed +24
Apr 5 at NOP 53% 115–114 L 131–138 ✗missed −8
Apr 4 vs POR 84% 128–112 W 119–109 ✓correct −6
Apr 2 at CHI 63% 117–112 L 107–128 ✗missed −26
Mar 31 vs LAC 63% 115–110 W 108–94 ✓correct +9
Mar 29 vs LAC 58% 113–110 L 132–141 ✗missed −12
Mar 28 vs ORL 63% 116–111 W 113–108 ✓correct ±0
Mar 26 at ATL 53% 121–120 W 123–119 ✓correct +3
Mar 24 vs HOU 87% 122–104 W 151–114 ✓correct +19
Mar 22 vs HOU 84% 121–105 W 130–125 ✓correct −11
Mar 20 vs DAL 72% 116–107 W 112–108 ✓correct −5
Mar 18 vs GSW 55% 115–113 W 133–119 ✓correct +12
Mar 17 at SAS 78% 121–109 W 126–120 ✓correct −6
Mar 15 at MIA 55% 112–110 L 119–138 ✗missed −21
Mar 13 at DAL 45% 117–119 W 104–88 ✗missed +18
Mar 11 vs DAL 78% 121–109 W 112–108 ✓correct −8
Mar 9 vs GSW 60% 116–112 W 131–110 ✓correct +17
Mar 7 at LAL 47% 112–113 L 103–112 ✓correct −8
Mar 5 at LAC 47% 115–116 L 129–135 ✓correct −5
Mar 3 at DEN 37% 111–116 L 97–113 ✓correct −11
Mar 1 at HOU 76% 125–114 W 113–99 ✓correct +3
Feb 28 vs LAL 70% 117–109 W 121–109 ✓correct +4
Feb 25 vs DEN 58% 114–111 W 112–94 ✓correct +15
Feb 23 at PHI 37% 109–114 L 105–110 ✓correct ±0
Feb 15 vs UTA 74% 122–112 W 117–111 ✓correct −4
Feb 12 at BOS 55% 111–109 L 109–119 ✗missed −12
Feb 10 vs MIN 53% 113–112 W 128–107 ✓correct +20
Feb 7 vs CHI 53% 115–114 W 104–89 ✓correct +14
Feb 5 vs TOR 47% 117–118 L 103–106 ✓correct −2
Feb 2 at CLE 45% 108–110 L 113–128 ✓correct −13
Feb 1 vs POR 76% 123–112 L 112–122 ✗missed −21
Jan 29 vs IND 65% 117–111 W 112–100 ✓correct +6
Jan 27 at MIN 60% 118–114 L 100–111 ✗missed −15
Jan 25 at GSW 63% 118–113 L 120–122 ✗missed −7
Jan 23 at SAC 42% 116–119 L 100–133 ✓correct −30
Jan 22 at PHX 55% 114–112 L 110–112 ✗missed −4
Jan 20 at LAL 47% 118–119 L 121–122 ✓correct ±0
Jan 18 vs CLE 60% 115–111 W 115–114 ✓correct −3
Jan 16 vs PHX 68% 119–112 W 136–106 ✓correct +23
Jan 14 at IND 65% 120–114 W 130–112 ✓correct +12
Jan 11 vs SAS 80% 121–108 W 135–129 ✓correct −7
Jan 9 vs SAS 81% 120–106 W 121–113 ✓correct −6
Jan 8 vs UTA 68% 120–113 W 123–118 ✓correct −2
Jan 5 at ORL 65% 117–111 W 123–115 ✓correct +2
Jan 4 at CHA 76% 122–111 W 131–107 ✓correct +13
Jan 1 vs SAC 58% 115–112 W 118–108 ✓correct +7
Dec 31 vs NOP 63% 117–112 W 116–101 ✓correct +10
Dec 29 at TOR 68% 115–108 W 119–106 ✓correct +6
Dec 27 vs PHX 78% 118–106 L 108–125 ✗missed −29
Dec 25 at GSW 63% 113–108 L 109–123 ✗missed −19
Dec 23 at PHX 42% 109–112 W 125–100 ✗missed +28
Dec 20 at DEN 47% 116–117 L 91–105 ✓correct −13
Dec 17 at OKC 72% 119–110 L 109–115 ✗missed −15
Dec 15 vs MIL 60% 114–110 W 142–101 ✓correct +37
Dec 12 vs ATL 70% 117–109 W 128–103 ✓correct +17
Dec 9 vs DET 76% 119–108 W 114–103 ✓correct ±0
Dec 7 vs OKC 65% 116–110 W 123–102 ✓correct +15
Dec 5 vs MIA 37% 108–113 W 101–93 ✗missed +13
Dec 4 at DET 70% 118–110 W 122–112 ✓correct +2
Dec 2 vs PHI 53% 109–108 W 117–109 ✓correct +7
Nov 30 at MIN 53% 114–113 L 101–109 ✗missed −9
Nov 27 at NYK 60% 115–111 W 127–123 ✓correct ±0
Nov 25 vs NOP 47% 112–113 W 132–111 ✗missed +22
Nov 22 vs SAC 72% 120–111 L 109–113 ✗missed −13
Nov 20 at BKN 47% 112–113 L 115–127 ✓correct −11
Nov 18 vs OKC 68% 114–107 W 121–110 ✓correct +4
Nov 15 at NOP 47% 109–110 L 102–113 ✓correct −10
Nov 13 at WAS 60% 113–109 L 92–102 ✗missed −14
Nov 11 vs MIN 55% 112–110 W 114–103 ✓correct +9
Nov 9 at SAS 78% 121–109 W 124–122 ✓correct −10
Nov 7 vs BOS 42% 110–113 L 106–109 ✓correct ±0
Nov 6 vs WAS 76% 118–107 W 103–97 ✓correct −5
Nov 4 vs CHA 63% 115–110 W 130–99 ✓correct +26
Nov 2 at POR 68% 113–106 W 111–106 ✓correct −2
Oct 31 at UTA 47% 110–111 L 105–121 ✓correct −15
Oct 29 at UTA 53% 109–108 L 123–124 ✗missed −2
Oct 27 at SAC 68% 118–111 W 125–110 ✓correct +8
Oct 24 vs BKN 60% 114–110 W 134–124 ✓correct +6
Oct 22 at DAL 53% 109–108 L 96–137 ✗missed −42
Oct 21 at HOU 72% 118–109 W 129–122 ✓correct −2
Oct 19 vs NYK 58% 111–108 W 115–112 ✓correct ±0

2022-23 to 2026-27

11.3 pts
average margin miss
90% interval 10.5 to 12.2; 22nd smallest of 30
−1.0
average margin error
+ = better than forecast; 90% interval -2.3 to 0.3
14.7 pts
error variability
std. deviation; league margin miss 11.0
69%
winner picked
345 games involving MEM
158 / 172.2
actual / expected wins
gap −14.2
0.213
Brier score
0.25 = coin flip; lower is better

Expected and actual wins

MEM: cumulative expected wins from pregame win probabilities against actual wins 0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170 158 actual 172.2 exp. 1173345 Game number in sample
Solid: actual wins. Dashed: expected wins, the running sum of MEM's pregame win probability in each game.

Margin error, game by game

MEM: margin forecast error in each game, actual minus predicted -60-300+30+60 Better than forecast Worse than forecast Games in date order
Each bar is one game: MEM's actual margin minus its predicted margin, in points. Positive bars sit above the line and negative bars below it, so direction does not depend on color.

How the errors are spread

MEM: distribution of 345 margin errors; mean -1.0 points 02447 -40 to -36 pts: 5 games -36 to -32 pts: 1 games -32 to -28 pts: 6 games -28 to -24 pts: 6 games -24 to -20 pts: 9 games -20 to -16 pts: 8 games -16 to -12 pts: 31 games -12 to -8 pts: 35 games -8 to -4 pts: 40 games -4 to 0 pts: 47 games 0 to 4 pts: 40 games 4 to 8 pts: 26 games 8 to 12 pts: 19 games 12 to 16 pts: 31 games 16 to 20 pts: 19 games 20 to 24 pts: 5 games 24 to 28 pts: 7 games 28 to 32 pts: 5 games 32 to 36 pts: 1 games 36 to 40 pts: 4 games mean -1.0 -40-200+20+40 worse than forecast better than forecast
Each bar counts games whose margin error fell in a 4-point range (errors beyond ±40 are in the end bars). Dashed line: the average error.

MEM against the league

Average margin miss by team, 2022-23 to 2026-27, smallest to largest; MEM is 22 of 30 891011121314 median 11.0 DET: 9.80 points over 356 games, 90% interval 9.17–10.47 DET 9.8 n=356 HOU: 10.09 points over 350 games, 90% interval 9.46–10.73 HOU 10.1 n=350 PHX: 10.25 points over 355 games, 90% interval 9.56–10.97 PHX 10.3 n=355 ORL: 10.50 points over 353 games, 90% interval 9.8–11.22 ORL 10.5 n=353 UTA: 10.63 points over 338 games, 90% interval 9.81–11.47 UTA 10.6 n=338 PHI: 10.64 points over 367 games, 90% interval 9.93–11.41 PHI 10.6 n=367 IND: 10.67 points over 376 games, 90% interval 9.99–11.4 IND 10.7 n=376 LAL: 10.71 points over 375 games, 90% interval 10.03–11.43 LAL 10.7 n=375 CLE: 10.74 points over 382 games, 90% interval 10.07–11.47 CLE 10.7 n=382 WAS: 10.74 points over 337 games, 90% interval 10.06–11.49 WAS 10.7 n=337 LAC: 10.76 points over 355 games, 90% interval 10.03–11.52 LAC 10.8 n=355 DEN: 10.83 points over 388 games, 90% interval 10.1–11.61 DEN 10.8 n=388 SAS: 10.88 points over 357 games, 90% interval 10.14–11.63 SAS 10.9 n=357 MIA: 10.95 points over 369 games, 90% interval 10.19–11.7 MIA 10.9 n=369 NOP: 10.98 points over 342 games, 90% interval 10.27–11.74 NOP 11.0 n=342 TOR: 11.08 points over 344 games, 90% interval 10.29–11.88 TOR 11.1 n=344 GSW: 11.12 points over 363 games, 90% interval 10.4–11.91 GSW 11.1 n=363 DAL: 11.15 points over 359 games, 90% interval 10.45–11.87 DAL 11.2 n=359 CHA: 11.18 points over 338 games, 90% interval 10.34–12.05 CHA 11.2 n=338 MIN: 11.18 points over 387 games, 90% interval 10.53–11.91 MIN 11.2 n=387 ATL: 11.32 points over 350 games, 90% interval 10.57–12.13 ATL 11.3 n=350 MEM: 11.35 points over 345 games, 90% interval 10.54–12.23 MEM 11.3 n=345 CHI: 11.43 points over 337 games, 90% interval 10.66–12.23 CHI 11.4 n=337 OKC: 11.49 points over 384 games, 90% interval 10.7–12.29 OKC 11.5 n=384 BKN: 11.55 points over 342 games, 90% interval 10.75–12.41 BKN 11.6 n=342 POR: 11.61 points over 342 games, 90% interval 10.75–12.42 POR 11.6 n=342 NYK: 11.63 points over 396 games, 90% interval 10.88–12.36 NYK 11.6 n=396 SAC: 11.66 points over 345 games, 90% interval 10.84–12.46 SAC 11.7 n=345 MIL: 11.68 points over 353 games, 90% interval 10.92–12.46 MIL 11.7 n=353 BOS: 11.96 points over 395 games, 90% interval 11.24–12.73 BOS 12.0 n=395 average margin miss, points (lower = easier to forecast)
Dots: average absolute margin error per team. Lines: 90% bootstrap intervals; overlapping lines mean the difference between those teams is not clear in this sample. Hollow dots: fewer than 20 games.
All 345 games in this sample
DateOpponentMEM win prob.ProjectedFinalPickMargin error
Nov 6 vs OKC 38% 112–116 L 97–128 ✓correct −27
Nov 4 vs IND 68% 120–114 L 103–107 ✗missed −10
Nov 2 vs NOP 56% 120–118 L 134–135 ✗missed −3
Oct 31 vs SAC 59% 122–119 W 136–105 ✓correct +28
Oct 29 at POR 24% 112–122 W 124–103 ✗missed +31
Oct 26 at UTA 47% 121–122 W 110–105 ✗missed +6
Oct 25 at SAC 44% 117–119 W 123–112 ✗missed +13
Oct 23 at GSW 39% 117–121 W 111–108 ✗missed +7
Oct 21 vs UTA 64% 127–122 W 123–103 ✓correct +15
Apr 12 at HOU 11% 106–124 L 101–132 ✓correct −13
Apr 10 at UTA 66% 124–118 L 101–147 ✗missed −52
Apr 8 at DEN 8% 110–132 L 119–136 ✓correct +5
Apr 6 vs CLE 27% 114–123 L 126–142 ✓correct −7
Apr 5 at MIL 41% 113–116 L 115–131 ✓correct −13
Apr 3 vs TOR 22% 113–124 L 96–128 ✓correct −21
Apr 1 vs NYK 20% 107–119 L 119–130 ✓correct +1
Mar 30 vs PHX 27% 110–119 L 105–131 ✓correct −17
Mar 28 vs CHI 39% 116–120 W 125–124 ✗missed +5
Mar 27 vs HOU 34% 113–119 L 109–119 ✓correct −4
Mar 25 vs SAS 17% 113–127 L 98–123 ✓correct −11
Mar 23 at ATL 20% 113–125 L 107–146 ✓correct −27
Mar 21 at CHA 17% 108–122 L 101–124 ✓correct −9
Mar 20 vs BOS 24% 108–118 L 112–117 ✓correct +5
Mar 18 vs DEN 29% 118–126 W 125–118 ✗missed +15
Mar 16 at CHI 44% 116–118 L 107–132 ✓correct −23
Mar 13 at DET 22% 110–121 L 110–126 ✓correct −5
Mar 12 vs DAL 53% 118–117 L 112–120 ✗missed −9
Mar 10 at PHI 47% 117–118 L 129–139 ✓correct −9
Mar 9 at BKN 61% 117–113 L 115–126 ✗missed −15
Mar 7 vs LAC 42% 114–117 L 120–123 ✓correct ±0
Mar 4 vs POR 42% 117–120 L 114–122 ✓correct −5
Mar 3 at MIN 26% 114–123 L 110–117 ✓correct +2
Mar 1 at IND 71% 121–113 W 125–106 ✓correct +11
Feb 27 at DAL 53% 119–118 W 124–105 ✓correct +18
Feb 25 vs GSW 47% 119–120 L 112–133 ✓correct −20
Feb 23 vs SAC 71% 123–115 L 114–123 ✗missed −17
Feb 21 at MIA 29% 114–122 L 120–136 ✓correct −8
Feb 20 vs UTA 67% 120–114 W 123–114 ✓correct +3
Feb 11 at DEN 36% 112–117 L 116–122 ✓correct −1
Feb 9 at GSW 31% 114–121 L 113–114 ✓correct +6
Feb 7 at POR 39% 116–120 L 115–122 ✓correct −3
Feb 6 at POR 36% 115–120 L 115–135 ✓correct −15
Feb 4 at SAC 53% 115–114 W 129–125 ✓correct +3
Feb 2 vs MIN 27% 111–120 W 137–128 ✗missed +18
Jan 31 vs MIN 29% 111–119 L 114–131 ✓correct −9
Jan 30 at NOP 44% 113–115 L 106–114 ✓correct −6
Jan 28 vs CHA 39% 111–115 L 97–112 ✓correct −11
Jan 26 at HOU 29% 109–117 L 99–108 ✓correct −1
Jan 23 vs NOP 67% 119–113 L 127–133 ✗missed −12
Jan 21 vs ATL 56% 117–115 L 122–124 ✗missed −4
Jan 11 vs BKN 67% 116–110 W 103–98 ✓correct −1
Jan 9 vs OKC 29% 115–123 L 116–117 ✓correct +7
Jan 7 vs PHX 42% 116–119 L 98–117 ✓correct −16
Jan 6 vs SAS 34% 115–121 W 106–105 ✗missed +7
Jan 4 at LAL 47% 118–119 L 114–120 ✓correct −5
Jan 2 at LAL 56% 118–116 L 121–128 ✗missed −9
Dec 30 vs PHI 61% 117–113 L 136–139 ✗missed −7
Dec 28 at WAS 74% 123–114 L 112–116 ✗missed −13
Dec 26 vs MIL 69% 118–111 W 125–104 ✓correct +14
Dec 23 at UTA 74% 122–113 W 137–128 ✓correct ±0
Dec 22 at OKC 15% 108–123 L 103–119 ✓correct −1
Dec 20 vs WAS 85% 123–108 L 122–130 ✗missed −23
Dec 17 at MIN 29% 111–119 W 116–110 ✗missed +14
Dec 15 at LAC 56% 115–113 W 121–103 ✓correct +16
Dec 12 vs UTA 71% 120–112 L 126–130 ✗missed −12
Dec 7 vs POR 67% 119–113 W 119–96 ✓correct +17
Dec 5 vs LAC 53% 115–114 W 107–98 ✓correct +8
Dec 2 at SAS 47% 116–117 L 119–126 ✓correct −6
Nov 30 at SAC 58% 117–114 W 115–107 ✓correct +5
Nov 28 at LAC 53% 115–114 W 112–107 ✓correct +4
Nov 26 at NOP 61% 118–114 W 133–128 ✓correct +1
Nov 24 vs DEN 47% 116–117 L 115–125 ✓correct −9
Nov 22 at DAL 47% 114–115 W 102–96 ✗missed +7
Nov 20 vs SAC 47% 115–116 W 137–96 ✗missed +42
Nov 18 at SAS 31% 113–120 L 101–111 ✓correct −3
Nov 15 at CLE 26% 115–124 L 100–108 ✓correct +1
Nov 12 at BOS 29% 110–118 L 95–131 ✓correct −28
Nov 11 at NYK 31% 115–122 L 120–133 ✓correct −6
Nov 9 vs OKC 29% 115–123 L 100–114 ✓correct −6
Nov 7 vs DAL 59% 120–117 W 118–104 ✓correct +11
Nov 5 vs HOU 44% 114–116 L 109–124 ✓correct −13
Nov 3 vs DET 42% 116–119 L 106–114 ✓correct −5
Nov 2 at TOR 56% 120–118 L 104–117 ✗missed −15
Oct 31 vs LAL 53% 118–117 L 112–117 ✗missed −6
Oct 29 at PHX 58% 118–115 W 114–113 ✓correct −2
Oct 27 at GSW 36% 114–119 L 118–131 ✓correct −8
Oct 25 vs IND 44% 115–117 W 128–103 ✗missed +27
Oct 24 vs MIA 67% 120–114 L 114–146 ✗missed −38
Oct 22 vs NOP 80% 121–109 W 128–122 ✓correct −6
Apr 26 PO vs OKC 29% 105–114 L 115–117 ✓correct +7
Apr 24 PO vs OKC 36% 108–114 L 108–114 ✓correct ±0
Apr 22 PO at OKC 21% 108–120 L 99–118 ✓correct −7
Apr 20 PO at OKC 21% 107–119 L 80–131 ✓correct −39
Apr 13 vs DAL 54% 117–116 W 132–97 ✓correct +34
Apr 11 at DEN 31% 115–122 L 109–117 ✓correct −1
Apr 10 vs MIN 49% 111–112 L 125–141 ✓correct −15
Apr 8 at CHA 71% 120–111 W 124–100 ✓correct +15
Apr 5 at DET 33% 115–121 W 109–103 ✗missed +12
Apr 3 at MIA 46% 113–114 W 110–108 ✗missed +3
Apr 1 vs GSW 54% 115–114 L 125–134 ✗missed −10
Mar 31 vs BOS 36% 110–116 L 103–117 ✓correct −8
Mar 29 vs LAL 67% 120–114 L 127–134 ✗missed −13
Mar 27 at OKC 19% 111–124 L 104–125 ✓correct −8
Mar 25 at UTA 73% 124–114 W 140–103 ✓correct +27
Mar 21 at LAC 33% 110–116 L 108–128 ✓correct −14
Mar 19 at POR 46% 115–116 L 99–115 ✓correct −15
Mar 17 at SAC 38% 114–118 L 122–132 ✓correct −6
Mar 15 vs MIA 67% 119–113 W 125–91 ✓correct +28
Mar 14 vs CLE 49% 119–120 L 124–133 ✓correct −8
Mar 12 vs UTA 73% 124–115 W 122–115 ✓correct −2
Mar 10 vs PHX 67% 123–117 W 120–118 ✓correct −4
Mar 9 at NOP 64% 123–117 W 107–104 ✓correct −3
Mar 7 at DAL 59% 119–115 W 122–111 ✓correct +7
Mar 5 vs OKC 49% 121–122 L 103–120 ✓correct −16
Mar 3 vs ATL 73% 125–116 L 130–132 ✗missed −11
Mar 1 vs SAS 73% 124–115 L 128–130 ✗missed −11
Feb 28 vs NYK 71% 122–114 L 113–114 ✗missed −9
Feb 25 vs PHX 77% 124–113 W 151–148 ✓correct −8
Feb 23 at CLE 33% 116–122 L 123–129 ✓correct ±0
Feb 21 at ORL 51% 115–114 W 105–104 ✓correct ±0
Feb 20 at IND 51% 121–120 L 113–127 ✗missed −15
Feb 12 at LAC 41% 117–120 L 114–128 ✓correct −11
Feb 11 at PHX 61% 121–116 W 119–112 ✓correct +2
Feb 8 vs OKC 67% 120–114 L 112–125 ✗missed −19
Feb 5 at TOR 69% 121–113 W 138–107 ✓correct +23
Feb 3 vs SAS 77% 125–114 W 128–109 ✓correct +8
Feb 2 at MIL 43% 122–124 W 132–119 ✗missed +15
Jan 30 vs HOU 62% 120–116 W 120–119 ✓correct −3
Jan 27 at NYK 41% 114–117 L 106–143 ✓correct −34
Jan 25 vs UTA 79% 122–110 W 125–103 ✓correct +10
Jan 24 vs NOP 77% 123–112 W 139–126 ✓correct +2
Jan 22 vs CHA 81% 122–109 W 132–120 ✓correct −1
Jan 20 vs MIN 67% 119–113 W 108–106 ✓correct −4
Jan 17 at SAS 51% 117–116 W 140–112 ✓correct +27
Jan 15 at SAS 51% 117–116 W 129–115 ✓correct +13
Jan 13 at HOU 38% 115–119 L 118–120 ✓correct +2
Jan 11 at MIN 43% 114–116 W 127–125 ✗missed +4
Jan 9 vs HOU 69% 120–113 L 115–119 ✗missed −11
Jan 6 vs DAL 54% 119–118 W 119–104 ✓correct +14
Jan 4 at GSW 51% 117–116 L 113–121 ✗missed −9
Jan 3 at SAC 46% 116–117 L 133–138 ✓correct −4
Dec 31 at PHX 54% 120–118 W 117–112 ✓correct +3
Dec 29 at OKC 29% 113–121 L 106–130 ✓correct −16
Dec 27 at NOP 75% 122–111 W 132–124 ✓correct −3
Dec 26 vs TOR 77% 123–112 W 155–126 ✓correct +18
Dec 23 vs LAC 69% 120–113 L 110–114 ✗missed −11
Dec 21 at ATL 56% 116–113 W 128–112 ✓correct +13
Dec 19 vs GSW 62% 119–115 W 144–93 ✓correct +47
Dec 15 at LAL 59% 118–114 L 110–116 ✗missed −10
Dec 13 vs BKN 81% 123–110 W 135–119 ✓correct +3
Dec 8 at WAS 79% 124–111 W 140–112 ✓correct +15
Dec 7 at BOS 23% 110–121 W 127–121 ✗missed +17
Dec 5 vs SAC 71% 121–113 W 115–110 ✓correct −3
Dec 3 at DAL 31% 114–121 L 116–121 ✓correct +2
Dec 1 vs IND 69% 122–115 W 136–121 ✓correct +8
Nov 29 vs NOP 84% 123–108 W 120–109 ✓correct −4
Nov 27 vs DET 71% 118–110 W 131–111 ✓correct +12
Nov 25 vs POR 69% 120–113 W 123–98 ✓correct +18
Nov 23 at CHI 46% 117–118 W 142–131 ✗missed +12
Nov 20 vs PHI 69% 116–109 W 117–111 ✓correct −1
Nov 19 vs DEN 62% 118–114 L 110–122 ✗missed −16
Nov 17 vs DEN 62% 120–116 W 105–90 ✓correct +11
Nov 15 at GSW 25% 111–121 L 118–123 ✓correct +5
Nov 13 at LAL 31% 115–122 L 123–128 ✓correct +2
Nov 10 at POR 43% 114–116 W 134–89 ✗missed +47
Nov 8 vs WAS 69% 122–115 W 128–104 ✓correct +17
Nov 6 vs LAL 46% 117–119 W 131–114 ✗missed +19
Nov 4 at BKN 36% 112–117 L 104–106 ✓correct +3
Nov 2 at PHI 27% 106–115 W 124–107 ✗missed +26
Oct 31 vs MIL 36% 111–117 W 122–99 ✗missed +29
Oct 30 vs BKN 54% 114–113 L 106–119 ✗missed −14
Oct 28 vs CHI 46% 115–117 L 123–126 ✓correct −1
Oct 26 vs ORL 39% 107–112 W 124–111 ✗missed +18
Oct 25 at HOU 27% 109–118 L 108–128 ✓correct −11
Oct 23 at UTA 41% 110–113 W 126–124 ✗missed +5
Apr 14 vs DEN 26% 105–120 L 111–126 ✓correct ±0
Apr 12 vs LAL 25% 108–124 L 120–123 ✓correct +13
Apr 10 at CLE 28% 108–117 L 98–110 ✓correct −3
Apr 9 vs SAS 43% 109–115 L 87–102 ✓correct −9
Apr 6 vs PHI 33% 105–116 L 96–116 ✓correct −9
Apr 5 vs DET 53% 110–111 W 108–90 ✗missed +19
Apr 3 at MIL 32% 110–117 W 111–101 ✗missed +17
Apr 1 at DET 41% 109–111 W 110–108 ✗missed +4
Mar 30 at ORL 30% 102–110 L 88–118 ✓correct −22
Mar 27 vs LAL 41% 111–118 L 124–136 ✓correct −5
Mar 25 at DEN 25% 104–115 L 103–128 ✓correct −14
Mar 22 at SAS 34% 106–112 W 99–97 ✗missed +8
Mar 20 at GSW 24% 103–115 L 116–137 ✓correct −9
Mar 18 at SAC 22% 102–115 L 111–121 ✓correct +3
Mar 16 vs OKC 41% 106–113 L 112–118 ✓correct +1
Mar 13 vs CHA 57% 106–105 L 98–110 ✗missed −13
Mar 12 vs WAS 61% 113–110 W 109–97 ✓correct +9
Mar 10 at OKC 19% 105–120 L 93–124 ✓correct −16
Mar 8 vs ATL 51% 106–108 L 92–99 ✓correct −5
Mar 6 at PHI 32% 102–109 W 115–109 ✗missed +13
Mar 4 at BKN 34% 103–109 W 106–102 ✗missed +10
Mar 2 vs POR 51% 105–107 L 100–107 ✓correct −5
Mar 1 vs POR 53% 108–109 L 92–122 ✓correct −29
Feb 28 at MIN 24% 105–117 L 101–110 ✓correct +3
Feb 26 vs BKN 53% 112–113 L 86–111 ✓correct −24
Feb 23 vs LAC 49% 114–117 L 95–101 ✓correct −3
Feb 15 vs MIL 35% 107–117 W 113–110 ✗missed +13
Feb 14 vs HOU 47% 110–114 W 121–113 ✗missed +12
Feb 12 vs NOP 41% 110–117 L 87–96 ✓correct −2
Feb 10 at CHA 51% 114–111 L 106–115 ✗missed −12
Feb 8 vs CHI 47% 109–113 L 110–118 ✓correct −4
Feb 6 at NYK 28% 104–113 L 113–123 ✓correct −1
Feb 4 at BOS 30% 106–114 L 91–131 ✓correct −32
Feb 2 vs GSW 47% 107–111 L 101–121 ✓correct −16
Feb 1 vs CLE 47% 108–112 L 101–108 ✓correct −3
Jan 29 vs SAC 41% 109–116 L 94–103 ✓correct −2
Jan 28 at IND 28% 111–120 L 110–116 ✓correct +3
Jan 26 vs ORL 49% 106–109 W 107–106 ✗missed +4
Jan 24 at MIA 32% 105–112 W 105–96 ✗missed +16
Jan 22 at TOR 25% 114–125 W 108–100 ✗missed +19
Jan 20 at CHI 35% 109–114 L 96–125 ✓correct −24
Jan 18 at MIN 22% 107–120 L 103–118 ✓correct −2
Jan 15 vs GSW 43% 110–116 W 116–107 ✗missed +15
Jan 13 vs NYK 33% 110–121 L 94–106 ✓correct −1
Jan 12 vs LAC 41% 108–115 L 119–128 ✓correct −2
Jan 9 at DAL 30% 112–120 W 120–103 ✗missed +25
Jan 7 at PHX 32% 111–118 W 121–115 ✗missed +13
Jan 5 at LAL 34% 111–117 W 127–113 ✗missed +20
Jan 3 vs TOR 49% 113–116 L 111–116 ✓correct −2
Jan 2 vs SAS 65% 119–114 W 106–98 ✓correct +3
Dec 31 vs SAC 49% 114–117 L 92–123 ✓correct −28
Dec 29 at LAC 32% 112–119 L 106–117 ✓correct −4
Dec 28 at DEN 35% 111–116 L 105–142 ✓correct −32
Dec 26 at NOP 34% 113–119 W 116–115 ✗missed +7
Dec 23 at ATL 35% 114–119 W 125–119 ✗missed +11
Dec 21 vs IND 51% 114–116 W 116–103 ✗missed +15
Dec 19 at NOP 30% 112–120 W 115–113 ✗missed +10
Dec 18 at OKC 25% 109–120 L 97–116 ✓correct −8
Dec 15 vs HOU 49% 108–111 L 96–103 ✓correct −4
Dec 13 at HOU 30% 104–112 L 104–117 ✓correct −5
Dec 11 vs DAL 57% 111–110 L 113–120 ✗missed −8
Dec 8 vs MIN 47% 107–111 L 103–127 ✓correct −20
Dec 6 at DET 43% 113–114 W 116–102 ✗missed +15
Dec 2 at PHX 35% 104–109 L 109–116 ✓correct −2
Dec 1 at DAL 35% 112–117 W 108–94 ✗missed +19
Nov 29 vs UTA 57% 113–112 W 105–91 ✓correct +13
Nov 26 vs MIN 41% 106–113 L 97–119 ✓correct −15
Nov 24 vs PHX 53% 110–111 L 89–110 ✓correct −20
Nov 22 at HOU 37% 108–112 L 91–111 ✓correct −16
Nov 19 vs BOS 49% 111–114 L 100–102 ✓correct +1
Nov 18 at SAS 51% 117–114 W 120–108 ✓correct +9
Nov 14 at LAL 37% 112–116 L 107–134 ✓correct −23
Nov 12 at LAC 32% 111–118 W 105–101 ✗missed +11
Nov 10 vs UTA 63% 117–113 L 121–127 ✗missed −10
Nov 8 vs MIA 51% 110–112 L 102–108 ✓correct −4
Nov 5 at POR 51% 115–112 W 112–100 ✓correct +9
Nov 3 at POR 51% 116–113 L 113–115 ✗missed −5
Nov 1 at UTA 47% 116–115 L 109–133 ✗missed −25
Oct 30 vs DAL 65% 118–113 L 110–125 ✗missed −20
Oct 28 at WAS 47% 118–117 L 106–113 ✗missed −8
Oct 27 vs DEN 53% 110–111 L 104–108 ✓correct −3
Oct 25 vs NOP 65% 115–110 L 104–111 ✗missed −12
Apr 28 PO at LAL 42% 109–112 L 85–125 ✓correct −37
Apr 26 PO vs LAL 58% 112–109 W 116–99 ✓correct +14
Apr 24 PO at LAL 30% 109–117 L 111–117 ✓correct +2
Apr 22 PO at LAL 40% 110–114 L 101–111 ✓correct −6
Apr 19 PO vs LAL 68% 118–111 W 103–93 ✓correct +3
Apr 16 PO vs LAL 81% 120–106 L 112–128 ✗missed −30
Apr 9 at OKC 53% 123–122 L 100–115 ✗missed −16
Apr 7 at MIL 47% 117–118 W 137–114 ✗missed +24
Apr 5 at NOP 53% 115–114 L 131–138 ✗missed −8
Apr 4 vs POR 84% 128–112 W 119–109 ✓correct −6
Apr 2 at CHI 63% 117–112 L 107–128 ✗missed −26
Mar 31 vs LAC 63% 115–110 W 108–94 ✓correct +9
Mar 29 vs LAC 58% 113–110 L 132–141 ✗missed −12
Mar 28 vs ORL 63% 116–111 W 113–108 ✓correct ±0
Mar 26 at ATL 53% 121–120 W 123–119 ✓correct +3
Mar 24 vs HOU 87% 122–104 W 151–114 ✓correct +19
Mar 22 vs HOU 84% 121–105 W 130–125 ✓correct −11
Mar 20 vs DAL 72% 116–107 W 112–108 ✓correct −5
Mar 18 vs GSW 55% 115–113 W 133–119 ✓correct +12
Mar 17 at SAS 78% 121–109 W 126–120 ✓correct −6
Mar 15 at MIA 55% 112–110 L 119–138 ✗missed −21
Mar 13 at DAL 45% 117–119 W 104–88 ✗missed +18
Mar 11 vs DAL 78% 121–109 W 112–108 ✓correct −8
Mar 9 vs GSW 60% 116–112 W 131–110 ✓correct +17
Mar 7 at LAL 47% 112–113 L 103–112 ✓correct −8
Mar 5 at LAC 47% 115–116 L 129–135 ✓correct −5
Mar 3 at DEN 37% 111–116 L 97–113 ✓correct −11
Mar 1 at HOU 76% 125–114 W 113–99 ✓correct +3
Feb 28 vs LAL 70% 117–109 W 121–109 ✓correct +4
Feb 25 vs DEN 58% 114–111 W 112–94 ✓correct +15
Feb 23 at PHI 37% 109–114 L 105–110 ✓correct ±0
Feb 15 vs UTA 74% 122–112 W 117–111 ✓correct −4
Feb 12 at BOS 55% 111–109 L 109–119 ✗missed −12
Feb 10 vs MIN 53% 113–112 W 128–107 ✓correct +20
Feb 7 vs CHI 53% 115–114 W 104–89 ✓correct +14
Feb 5 vs TOR 47% 117–118 L 103–106 ✓correct −2
Feb 2 at CLE 45% 108–110 L 113–128 ✓correct −13
Feb 1 vs POR 76% 123–112 L 112–122 ✗missed −21
Jan 29 vs IND 65% 117–111 W 112–100 ✓correct +6
Jan 27 at MIN 60% 118–114 L 100–111 ✗missed −15
Jan 25 at GSW 63% 118–113 L 120–122 ✗missed −7
Jan 23 at SAC 42% 116–119 L 100–133 ✓correct −30
Jan 22 at PHX 55% 114–112 L 110–112 ✗missed −4
Jan 20 at LAL 47% 118–119 L 121–122 ✓correct ±0
Jan 18 vs CLE 60% 115–111 W 115–114 ✓correct −3
Jan 16 vs PHX 68% 119–112 W 136–106 ✓correct +23
Jan 14 at IND 65% 120–114 W 130–112 ✓correct +12
Jan 11 vs SAS 80% 121–108 W 135–129 ✓correct −7
Jan 9 vs SAS 81% 120–106 W 121–113 ✓correct −6
Jan 8 vs UTA 68% 120–113 W 123–118 ✓correct −2
Jan 5 at ORL 65% 117–111 W 123–115 ✓correct +2
Jan 4 at CHA 76% 122–111 W 131–107 ✓correct +13
Jan 1 vs SAC 58% 115–112 W 118–108 ✓correct +7
Dec 31 vs NOP 63% 117–112 W 116–101 ✓correct +10
Dec 29 at TOR 68% 115–108 W 119–106 ✓correct +6
Dec 27 vs PHX 78% 118–106 L 108–125 ✗missed −29
Dec 25 at GSW 63% 113–108 L 109–123 ✗missed −19
Dec 23 at PHX 42% 109–112 W 125–100 ✗missed +28
Dec 20 at DEN 47% 116–117 L 91–105 ✓correct −13
Dec 17 at OKC 72% 119–110 L 109–115 ✗missed −15
Dec 15 vs MIL 60% 114–110 W 142–101 ✓correct +37
Dec 12 vs ATL 70% 117–109 W 128–103 ✓correct +17
Dec 9 vs DET 76% 119–108 W 114–103 ✓correct ±0
Dec 7 vs OKC 65% 116–110 W 123–102 ✓correct +15
Dec 5 vs MIA 37% 108–113 W 101–93 ✗missed +13
Dec 4 at DET 70% 118–110 W 122–112 ✓correct +2
Dec 2 vs PHI 53% 109–108 W 117–109 ✓correct +7
Nov 30 at MIN 53% 114–113 L 101–109 ✗missed −9
Nov 27 at NYK 60% 115–111 W 127–123 ✓correct ±0
Nov 25 vs NOP 47% 112–113 W 132–111 ✗missed +22
Nov 22 vs SAC 72% 120–111 L 109–113 ✗missed −13
Nov 20 at BKN 47% 112–113 L 115–127 ✓correct −11
Nov 18 vs OKC 68% 114–107 W 121–110 ✓correct +4
Nov 15 at NOP 47% 109–110 L 102–113 ✓correct −10
Nov 13 at WAS 60% 113–109 L 92–102 ✗missed −14
Nov 11 vs MIN 55% 112–110 W 114–103 ✓correct +9
Nov 9 at SAS 78% 121–109 W 124–122 ✓correct −10
Nov 7 vs BOS 42% 110–113 L 106–109 ✓correct ±0
Nov 6 vs WAS 76% 118–107 W 103–97 ✓correct −5
Nov 4 vs CHA 63% 115–110 W 130–99 ✓correct +26
Nov 2 at POR 68% 113–106 W 111–106 ✓correct −2
Oct 31 at UTA 47% 110–111 L 105–121 ✓correct −15
Oct 29 at UTA 53% 109–108 L 123–124 ✗missed −2
Oct 27 at SAC 68% 118–111 W 125–110 ✓correct +8
Oct 24 vs BKN 60% 114–110 W 134–124 ✓correct +6
Oct 22 at DAL 53% 109–108 L 96–137 ✗missed −42
Oct 21 at HOU 72% 118–109 W 129–122 ✓correct −2
Oct 19 vs NYK 58% 111–108 W 115–112 ✓correct ±0

Surprise games

All MEM surprises

Across every graded season. The percentage is the pregame chance the forecast gave the team that won.

Most unexpected MEM wins

  1. 23%MEM beat BOS127–121Dec 7, 2024-25 · forecast BOS121–110 · missed margin by 17
  2. 24%MEM beat POR124–103Oct 29, 2026-27 · forecast POR122–112 · missed margin by 31
  3. 25%MEM beat TOR108–100Jan 22, 2023-24 · forecast TOR125–114 · missed margin by 19
  4. 27%MEM beat MIN137–128Feb 2, 2025-26 · forecast MIN120–111 · missed margin by 18
  5. 27%MEM beat PHI124–107Nov 2, 2024-25 · forecast PHI115–106 · missed margin by 26

Most unexpected MEM losses

  1. 15%WAS beat MEM130–122Dec 20, 2025-26 · forecast MEM123–108 · missed margin by 23
  2. 19%LAL beat MEM128–112Apr 16, 2022-23 · playoffs · forecast MEM120–106 · missed margin by 30
  3. 22%PHX beat MEM125–108Dec 27, 2022-23 · forecast MEM118–106 · missed margin by 29
  4. 24%POR beat MEM122–112Feb 1, 2022-23 · forecast MEM123–112 · missed margin by 21
  5. 27%WAS beat MEM116–112Dec 28, 2025-26 · forecast MEM123–114 · missed margin by 13

Largest margin misses

  1. 34%UTA beat MEM147–101Apr 10, 2025-26 · forecast MEM124–118 · missed margin by 52
  2. 62%MEM beat GSW144–93Dec 19, 2024-25 · forecast MEM119–115 · missed margin by 47
  3. 43%MEM beat POR134–89Nov 10, 2024-25 · forecast POR116–114 · missed margin by 47
  4. 47%MEM beat SAC137–96Nov 20, 2025-26 · forecast SAC116–115 · missed margin by 42
  5. 47%DAL beat MEM137–96Oct 22, 2022-23 · forecast MEM109–108 · missed margin by 42

Recent results the forecast got wrong

  1. 32%IND beat MEM107–103Nov 4, 2026-27 · forecast MEM120–114 · missed margin by 10
  2. 44%NOP beat MEM135–134Nov 2, 2026-27 · forecast MEM120–118 · missed margin by 3
  3. 24%MEM beat POR124–103Oct 29, 2026-27 · forecast POR122–112 · missed margin by 31
  4. 47%MEM beat UTA110–105Oct 26, 2026-27 · forecast UTA122–121 · missed margin by 6
  5. 44%MEM beat SAC123–112Oct 25, 2026-27 · forecast SAC119–117 · missed margin by 13

Definitions

Expected wins
The sum of the team's pregame win probabilities over the games in the sample (home: the stored home win probability; road: one minus it).
Wins vs expectation
Actual wins minus expected wins. It describes results relative to the forecasts, not why they differed.
Margin error
The team's actual margin minus its forecast margin, in points. Positive means the team did better than forecast.
Error variability
The sample standard deviation of margin errors. Higher means the forecasts for this team's games were less consistent.
Winner picked
The share of the team's games in which the forecast winner won, whichever team that was. Teams play different mixes of close and lopsided games, so this alone is not a fair measure of how hard a team is to forecast.
Average margin miss
The mean absolute margin error. This is the headline measure of how hard a team's games were for this model to forecast.
Average margin error
The mean signed margin error. Consistently positive means the model underrated the team in this sample; negative, overrated.
Brier score
The mean squared difference between the team's pregame win probability and the result (1 for a win, 0 for a loss). It rewards confident correct forecasts and penalises confident wrong ones.
Intervals and samples
Ranges are 90% bootstrap intervals (1,000 resamples of the team's games). Under 20 games no ranking is shown; 20 to 59 games is exploratory; 60 or more is roughly a full season.

More on how forecasts are made and tested: Methodology.