2023-24 · Regular Season · Final
Miami Heat at Sacramento Kings
Monday, February 26, 2024 · tip-off time not recorded
MIA 2–1@SAC 1–4 records going into the game NBA.com recap ↗
Forecast and result
| Team | Projected | Final | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MIA Miami Heat | 113 | 121 | +8 |
| SAC Sacramento Kings (home) | 122 | 110 | −12 |
Forecast: Sacramento Kings to win, 72% win probability, projected margin 9.
Inside the Forecast
How the inputs are builtWhat the model received
| Input | MIA | SAC |
|---|---|---|
| Elo ratingMargin-of-victory Elo; 1500 is average. | 1556 | 1554 |
| Elo gap, home minus road, incl. home court | +68 | |
| Season scoring marginPoints per game, blended with last season early in the year. | +0.4 | +0.8 |
| Games played this season | 56 | 56 |
| Offensive rating, last 10Points scored per 100 possessions. | 113.5 | 118.6 |
| Defensive rating, last 10Points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better. | 106.7 | 117.5 |
| Combined pace, last 10Possessions per game, both teams. | 99.6 | |
| Rotation points missingPoints per game of rotation players listed Out or Doubtful. | 75.3 | 0.0 |
| Rest days | 3 | 1 |
| Second night of a back-to-back | No | Yes |
This forecast can't be broken down exactly: the model version that made this forecast is not available. Explanations are shown only when the model that made a forecast can be rebuilt and reproduces it. How explanations are checked
Built from the box scores
How the breakdowns workWhere each input came from. Open a row to see the games and box-score stats behind it. A breakdown is shown only when rebuilding it from the stored stats gives exactly the number the model received.
Elo ratingMIA1556SAC1554
Updated after every game from the final score only: wins, losses and margin. Each season starts by keeping 75% of last season's distance from the 1500 average.
MIA1556
- Ended last season at 1600 → started this one at 1575
- First 46 games: −87.7
- Last 10 games: +68.6
- LPHX105–118−12.5
- WSAC115–106+9.1
- W@WAS110–102+6.3
- LLAC95–103−5.9
- WORL121–95+16.8
- WSAS116–104+3.3
- LBOS106–110−4.0
- W@MIL123–97+30.6
- W@PHI109–104+7.7
- W@NOP106–95+17.2
SAC1554
- Ended last season at 1531 → started this one at 1523
- First 46 games: −4.2
- Last 10 games: +34.9
- W@IND133–122+15.0
- W@CHI123–115+9.8
- L@CLE110–136−9.6
- LDET120–133−30.6
- WDEN135–106+25.9
- L@OKC113–127−7.2
- L@PHX125–130−4.0
- W@DEN102–98+9.9
- WSAS127–122+1.9
- W@LAC123–107+23.8
Season scoring marginMIA+0.4SAC+0.8
Points scored minus points allowed per game this season, mixed with last season's margin until 20 games are played.
MIA+0.4
Scores 110.5, allows 110.1 over 56 games: +0.4 a game.
SAC+0.8
Scores 118.6, allows 117.8 over 56 games: +0.8 a game.
Offensive rating, last 10MIA113.5SAC118.6
Points scored per 100 possessions. Split into the four factors: right of center helps the team, left hurts, in points per 100 possessions compared with the league average (2023-24 to date: 115.1).
MIA113.5scored, −1.6 vs league
| Factor | MIA | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 53.5% | 54.9% | −2.1 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 10.4% | 11.6% | +1.7 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 21.4% | 24.3% | −1.3 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.198 | 0.200 | −0.1 | |
| Everything else | +0.1 |
SAC118.6scored, +3.5 vs league
| Factor | SAC | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 58.5% | 54.9% | +5.5 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 11.4% | 11.6% | +0.2 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 21.2% | 24.3% | −1.4 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.167 | 0.200 | −1.0 | |
| Everything else | +0.1 |
Defensive rating, last 10MIA106.7SAC117.5
Points allowed per 100 possessions, built from what opponents did in those games. Bars point right when the defense held opponents below average. Split into the four factors: right of center helps the team, left hurts, in points per 100 possessions compared with the league average (2023-24 to date: 115.1).
MIA106.7allowed, −8.5 vs league
| Factor | Opponents | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 51.8% | 54.9% | +4.6 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 11.5% | 11.6% | −0.1 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 18.5% | 24.3% | +2.6 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.149 | 0.200 | +1.5 | |
| Everything else | −0.1 |
SAC117.5allowed, +2.4 vs league
| Factor | Opponents | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 57.8% | 54.9% | −4.4 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 11.9% | 11.6% | +0.6 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 20.3% | 24.3% | +1.8 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.224 | 0.200 | −0.7 | |
| Everything else | +0.3 |
Pace, last 10average 99.6
Possessions per 48 minutes. The model uses the average of the two teams. Faster games mean more points for both sides, so pace mostly moves the projected total, not the margin.
MIA 97.3 and SAC 102.0 → average 99.6 (league 2023-24 to date: 99.7)
Rotation points missingMIA75.3SAC0.0
Points per game of rotation players (two or more of the last 10 games this season, 15+ minutes) listed Out or Doubtful on the official injury report.
MIA75.3pts/g missing
| Player | Pts | Min | Games |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jimmy Butler III | 23.6 | 34.1 | 7 |
| Tyler Herro | 18.3 | 32.3 | 9 |
| Terry Rozier | 14.3 | 29.8 | 7 |
| Josh Richardson | 11.6 | 24.3 | 7 |
| Nikola Jović | 7.5 | 16.9 | 4 |
Source: official injury report, 2024-02-26 17:30 ET. 11 rotation players.
SAC0.0pts/g missing
Every rotation player was available.
Source: official injury report, 2024-02-26 17:30 ET. 8 rotation players.
RestMIA3 daysSAC1 days
Days since the team's previous game, capped at 5. One day means the second night of a back-to-back.
MIA3days
Last played Feb 23 against NOP.
SAC1day, back-to-back
Last played Feb 25 against LAC.
The last 10 games behind these numbers, box-score totals
MIA
| Date | Opp | Score | FG | 3P | FT | TOV | OREB | Off | Def | Pace |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23 | @NOP | 106–95 | 38-82 | 13-29 | 17-25 | 14 | 10 | 109.3 | 99.0 | 96.5 |
| Feb 14 | @PHI | 109–104 | 42-88 | 11-35 | 14-15 | 13 | 10 | 113.5 | 108.3 | 96.0 |
| Feb 13 | @MIL | 123–97 | 45-87 | 19-40 | 14-18 | 14 | 7 | 121.8 | 96.0 | 101.0 |
| Feb 11 | BOS | 106–110 | 40-97 | 12-40 | 14-15 | 7 | 14 | 116.5 | 120.9 | 91.0 |
| Feb 7 | SAS | 116–104 | 43-87 | 12-38 | 18-23 | 10 | 5 | 111.5 | 102.0 | 103.0 |
| Feb 6 | ORL | 121–95 | 47-87 | 13-36 | 14-18 | 13 | 11 | 123.5 | 97.9 | 97.5 |
| Feb 4 | LAC | 95–103 | 38-91 | 8-30 | 11-12 | 10 | 12 | 100.0 | 108.4 | 95.0 |
| Feb 2 | @WAS | 110–102 | 38-88 | 7-31 | 27-35 | 12 | 14 | 111.1 | 102.0 | 99.5 |
| Jan 31 | SAC | 115–106 | 42-84 | 13-28 | 18-23 | 8 | 7 | 118.6 | 109.3 | 97.0 |
| Jan 29 | PHX | 105–118 | 33-84 | 14-36 | 25-25 | 11 | 8 | 109.4 | 122.9 | 96.0 |
SAC
| Date | Opp | Score | FG | 3P | FT | TOV | OREB | Off | Def | Pace |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25 | @LAC | 123–107 | 45-91 | 15-37 | 18-22 | 10 | 14 | 130.9 | 115.1 | 93.5 |
| Feb 22 | SAS | 127–122 | 52-93 | 13-33 | 10-14 | 10 | 7 | 124.5 | 120.8 | 101.5 |
| Feb 14 | @DEN | 102–98 | 39-89 | 9-33 | 15-19 | 14 | 10 | 100.0 | 97.0 | 101.5 |
| Feb 13 | @PHX | 125–130 | 49-95 | 9-31 | 18-24 | 13 | 15 | 120.2 | 122.6 | 105.0 |
| Feb 11 | @OKC | 113–127 | 44-90 | 16-42 | 9-13 | 18 | 10 | 113.0 | 127.0 | 100.0 |
| Feb 9 | DEN | 135–106 | 51-87 | 17-34 | 16-18 | 16 | 6 | 131.1 | 102.9 | 103.0 |
| Feb 7 | DET | 120–133 | 45-95 | 15-44 | 15-22 | 4 | 5 | 117.6 | 133.0 | 101.0 |
| Feb 5 | @CLE | 110–136 | 43-93 | 17-44 | 7-12 | 12 | 10 | 112.2 | 137.4 | 98.5 |
| Feb 3 | @CHI | 123–115 | 42-84 | 15-39 | 24-29 | 16 | 4 | 116.0 | 108.5 | 106.0 |
| Feb 2 | @IND | 133–122 | 51-90 | 13-34 | 18-28 | 16 | 9 | 120.9 | 110.9 | 110.0 |
Off and Def are points scored and allowed per 100 possessions in each game; their averages are the 10-game ratings above. OREB is missing (–) where the source data didn't record it.
The result against the forecast
2023-24 surprise gamesSurprise is measured against this model's forecast, not against what other observers expected. Outcome surprise is −ln(winner's pregame probability): 0.69 for a coin flip, 2.3 for a 10% winner.
Team box score
What happened in the game. These numbers are not used by the forecast, and they are not offered as the reason it missed.
| Team stat | MIA | SAC |
|---|---|---|
| Final score | 121 | 110 |
| Field goals | 45–87 · 51.7% | 45–85 · 52.9% |
| Three-pointers | 11–30 · 36.7% | 13–32 · 40.6% |
| Free throws | 20–25 · 80.0% | 7–12 · 58.3% |
| Rebounds | 39 | 41 |
| Assists | 27 | 30 |
| Turnovers | 11 | 15 |
| Steals | 12 | 10 |
| Blocks | 3 | 5 |
How the model does with these teams over time: Miami Heat · Sacramento Kings
Where the forecast differed from the result
| Measure | Forecast | Actual | Actual − forecast |
|---|---|---|---|
| Home margin (SAC) | +9 | −11 | −20 |
| Total points | 235 | 231 | −4 |
| MIA points | 113 | 121 | +8 |
| SAC points | 122 | 110 | −12 |
Score by quarter
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | OT | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIA | 32 | 33 | 36 | 20 | – | 121 |
| SAC | 33 | 29 | 19 | 29 | – | 110 |
Recent form before this game
Previous meetings
| Date | Matchup | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 31 2023-24 | SAC at MIA | SAC 106 – 115 MIA |
| Nov 2 2022-23 | SAC at MIA | SAC 107 – 110 MIA |
| Oct 29 2022-23 | MIA at SAC | MIA 113 – 119 SAC |
| Mar 28 2021-22 | SAC at MIA | SAC 100 – 123 MIA |
| Jan 2 2021-22 | MIA at SAC | MIA 113 – 115 SAC |