2026-27 · Regular Season · Final
Milwaukee Bucks at Minnesota Timberwolves
Monday, November 2, 2026 · tip-off 8:00 PM ET
MIL 1–5@MIN 4–3 records going into the game NBA.com recap ↗
Forecast and result
| Team | Projected | Final | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MIL Milwaukee Bucks | 110 | 100 | −10 |
| MIN Minnesota Timberwolves (home) | 122 | 112 | −10 |
Forecast: Minnesota Timberwolves to win, 80% win probability, projected margin 12.
Inside the Forecast
How the inputs are builtWhy the model leans MIN
- Home court+2.1 MINWhat the model gives the home team on an average night.
- Team strength+7.1 MINElo MIN 1593, MIL 1342; season margin MIN +5.4, MIL −8.3.
- Recent form+4.3 MINLast 10 games, per 100 possessions: MIN scores 112.6 and allows 109.8; MIL scores 108.8 and allows 119.9.
- Player availability+1.7 MILMIN without Anthony Edwards (33 ppg).
Together: MIN by 12, a 80% chance. Smaller inputs make up the rest; the chart below has all of them.
Team-by-team notes from the box scores
MIN is 4–3, winning by 11 a game on average (scoring 120, allowing 109). Last season they were a +2 team, which still counts for 65% of their season margin. Their offense shoots 53% eFG against a 55% league average, which alone costs about 2.5 points per 100 possessions. Their defense holds opponents to 53% eFG against a 55% league average, which alone adds about 2.4 points per 100 possessions. Smaller factors: forcing turnovers +1.9. Anthony Edwards (33 ppg) is out.
MIL is 1–5, losing by 13 a game on average (scoring 113, allowing 126). Last season they were a −6 team, which still counts for 70% of their season margin. Their offense turns it over on 14.2% of possessions (league 12.2%), which alone costs about 2.8 points per 100 possessions. Smaller factors: getting to the line −1.3, offensive rebounding +1.2. Their defense lets opponents shoot 57% eFG against a 55% league average, which alone costs about 3 points per 100 possessions. Smaller factors: forcing turnovers −2.8.
Written from the numbers in Built from the box scores, using only values that rebuild exactly.
How the projected margin was built
Points of home margin. Right of zero favors MIN; left favors MIL.
Every input the model received, with its effect
| Input | MIL | MIN | Effect, pts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elo ratingMargin-of-victory Elo; 1500 is average. | 1342 | 1593 | +0.7 |
| Elo gap, home minus road, incl. home court | +321 | +5.1 | |
| Season scoring marginPoints per game, blended with last season early in the year. | −8.3 | +5.4 | +2.2 |
| Games played this season | 6 | 7 | −0.8 |
| Offensive rating, last 10Points scored per 100 possessions. | 108.8 | 112.6 | +1.1 |
| Defensive rating, last 10Points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better. | 119.9 | 109.8 | +2.7 |
| Combined pace, last 10Possessions per game, both teams. | 102.1 | +0.6 | |
| Rotation points missingPoints per game of rotation players listed Out or Doubtful. | 0.0 | 33.3 | −1.7 |
| Rest days | 2 | 2 | −0.1 |
| Second night of a back-to-back | No | No | +0.0 |
All 21 raw inputs, in points for each team
| Input | Value | MIN pts | MIL pts | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elo gap incl. home court | 320.9 | +2.27 | −2.80 | +5.07 |
| Season scoring margin (away) | -8.3 | +0.84 | −0.87 | +1.72 |
| Defensive rating, last 10 (away) | 119.9 | +1.72 | +0.05 | +1.67 |
| Offensive rating, last 10 (away) | 108.8 | −0.04 | −1.25 | +1.21 |
| Defensive rating, last 10 (home) | 109.8 | −0.46 | −1.45 | +0.99 |
| Rotation points missing (away) | 0.0 | −0.40 | +0.49 | −0.89 |
| Rotation points missing (home) | 33.3 | −0.61 | +0.16 | −0.77 |
| Games played (away) | 6.0 | +0.16 | +0.78 | −0.62 |
| Combined pace, last 10 | 102.1 | +3.46 | +2.86 | +0.60 |
| Season scoring margin (home) | 5.4 | +0.16 | −0.28 | +0.44 |
| Elo rating (away) | 1341.9 | +0.31 | −0.13 | +0.44 |
| Elo rating (home) | 1592.8 | +0.01 | −0.22 | +0.23 |
| Home series wins | 0.0 | +0.25 | +0.02 | +0.23 |
| Games played (home) | 7.0 | −0.04 | +0.10 | −0.15 |
| Offensive rating, last 10 (home) | 112.6 | −0.34 | −0.19 | −0.15 |
| Rest days (home) | 2.0 | +0.01 | +0.05 | −0.04 |
| Back-to-back (home) | 0 | +0.01 | −0.01 | +0.03 |
| Rest days (away) | 2.0 | +0.00 | +0.02 | −0.02 |
| Elimination game | 0 | ±0.00 | −0.00 | +0.00 |
| Back-to-back (away) | 0 | ±0.00 | ±0.00 | ±0.00 |
| Series pressure | 0.0 | +0.02 | +0.02 | ±0.00 |
| Baseline (average output) | 114.4 | 112.4 | +2.10 |
Built from the box scores
How the breakdowns workWhere each input came from. Open a row to see the games and box-score stats behind it. A breakdown is shown only when rebuilding it from the stored stats gives exactly the number the model received.
Elo ratingMIL1342MIN15935.7 pts toward MIN
Updated after every game from the final score only: wins, losses and margin. Each season starts by keeping 75% of last season's distance from the 1500 average.
MIL1342
- Ended last season at 1344 → started this one at 1383
- This season's 6 games: −40.9
- L@WAS116–128−13.1
- LCHI125–132−10.7
- L@PHI116–127−3.4
- WIND110–102+7.8
- LHOU100–132−11.2
- LCLE111–136−10.3
MIN1593
- Ended last season at 1570 → started this one at 1553
- This season's 7 games: +40.1
- W@MIA131–106+21.7
- W@ORL115–93+19.0
- WTOR117–94+11.6
- L@CLE125–127−4.3
- LGSW114–119−13.3
- WLAC127–101+10.7
- L@SAS111–121−5.3
Season scoring marginMIL−8.3MIN+5.41.4 pts toward MIN
Points scored minus points allowed per game this season, mixed with last season's margin until 20 games are played.
MIL−8.3
Scores 113.0, allows 126.2 over 6 games: −13.2 a game.
30% this season (−13.2) + 70% last season (−6.2) = −8.3
MIN+5.4
Scores 120.0, allows 108.7 over 7 games: +11.3 a game.
35% this season (+11.3) + 65% last season (+2.2) = +5.4
Offensive rating, last 10MIL108.8MIN112.61.1 pts toward MIN
Points scored per 100 possessions. Split into the four factors: right of center helps the team, left hurts, in points per 100 possessions compared with the league average (2025-26: 114.6).
MIL108.8scored, −5.8 vs league
| Factor | MIL | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 53.7% | 54.5% | −1.2 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 14.2% | 12.2% | −2.8 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 28.8% | 26.1% | +1.2 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.164 | 0.210 | −1.3 | |
| Everything else | −1.7 |
MIN112.6scored, −2.0 vs league
| Factor | MIN | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 52.9% | 54.5% | −2.5 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 12.0% | 12.2% | +0.3 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 27.9% | 26.1% | +0.8 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.189 | 0.210 | −0.6 | |
| Everything else | −0.0 |
Defensive rating, last 10MIL119.9MIN109.82.7 pts toward MIN
Points allowed per 100 possessions, built from what opponents did in those games. Bars point right when the defense held opponents below average. Split into the four factors: right of center helps the team, left hurts, in points per 100 possessions compared with the league average (2025-26: 114.6).
MIL119.9allowed, +5.3 vs league
| Factor | Opponents | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 56.5% | 54.5% | −3.1 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 10.2% | 12.2% | −2.8 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 24.2% | 26.1% | +0.8 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.240 | 0.210 | −0.8 | |
| Everything else | +0.6 |
MIN109.8allowed, −4.8 vs league
| Factor | Opponents | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 52.9% | 54.5% | +2.4 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 13.5% | 12.2% | +1.9 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 26.2% | 26.1% | −0.1 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.229 | 0.210 | −0.5 | |
| Everything else | +1.1 |
Pace, last 10average 102.10.6 pts toward MIN
Possessions per 48 minutes. The model uses the average of the two teams. Faster games mean more points for both sides, so pace mostly moves the projected total, not the margin.
MIL 102.2 and MIN 102.1 → average 102.1 (league 2025-26: 100.0)
Rotation points missingMIL0.0MIN33.31.7 pts toward MIL
Points per game of rotation players (two or more of the last 10 games this season, 15+ minutes) listed Out or Doubtful on the official injury report.
MIL0.0pts/g missing
Every rotation player was available.
Source: official injury report, 2026-11-02 17:30 ET. 10 rotation players.
MIN33.3pts/g missing
| Player | Pts | Min | Games |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anthony Edwards | 33.2 | 33.7 | 4 |
Source: official injury report, 2026-11-02 17:30 ET. 9 rotation players.
RestMIL2 daysMIN2 daysno effect on the margin
Days since the team's previous game, capped at 5. One day means the second night of a back-to-back.
MIL2days
Last played Oct 31 against CLE.
MIN2days
Last played Oct 31 against SAS.
The last 10 games behind these numbers, box-score totals
MIL
| Date | Opp | Score | FG | 3P | FT | TOV | OREB | Off | Def | Pace |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31 | CLE | 111–136 | 41-100 | 17-51 | 12-18 | 13 | 15 | 105.7 | 129.5 | 105.0 |
| Oct 28 | HOU | 100–132 | 37-93 | 12-41 | 14-18 | 16 | 15 | 98.0 | 129.4 | 102.0 |
| Oct 26 | IND | 110–102 | 41-95 | 13-44 | 15-21 | 11 | 16 | 104.8 | 99.0 | 104.0 |
| Oct 24 | @PHI | 116–127 | 42-90 | 11-34 | 21-28 | 22 | 17 | 104.5 | 115.5 | 110.5 |
| Oct 23 | CHI | 125–132 | 46-92 | 19-46 | 14-26 | 19 | 11 | 113.6 | 120.0 | 110.0 |
| Oct 21 | @WAS | 116–128 | 41-91 | 15-41 | 19-23 | 16 | 13 | 112.6 | 123.1 | 103.5 |
| Apr 12 | @PHI | 106–126 | 39-90 | 13-47 | 15-22 | 17 | 9 | 101.9 | 121.2 | 104.0 |
| Apr 10 | BKN | 125–108 | 45-81 | 24-48 | 11-16 | 17 | 7 | 130.2 | 112.5 | 96.0 |
| Apr 8 | @DET | 111–137 | 36-86 | 17-50 | 22-28 | 13 | 13 | 119.4 | 145.7 | 93.5 |
| Apr 7 | @BKN | 90–96 | 35-81 | 15-45 | 5-8 | 19 | 9 | 96.8 | 103.2 | 93.0 |
MIN
| Date | Opp | Score | FG | 3P | FT | TOV | OREB | Off | Def | Pace |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31 | @SAS | 111–121 | 40-93 | 9-33 | 22-26 | 14 | 13 | 111.0 | 121.0 | 100.0 |
| Oct 30 | LAC | 127–101 | 51-95 | 18-42 | 7-11 | 11 | 12 | 127.0 | 102.0 | 99.5 |
| Oct 28 | GSW | 114–119 | 40-90 | 15-45 | 19-27 | 15 | 7 | 105.6 | 110.2 | 108.0 |
| Oct 26 | @CLE | 125–127 | 49-102 | 13-40 | 14-23 | 17 | 17 | 112.6 | 112.4 | 101.4 |
| Oct 25 | TOR | 117–94 | 43-77 | 15-31 | 16-25 | 23 | 9 | 118.2 | 95.9 | 98.5 |
| Oct 23 | @ORL | 115–93 | 42-98 | 14-37 | 17-30 | 12 | 22 | 113.9 | 92.1 | 101.0 |
| Oct 21 | @MIA | 131–106 | 46-98 | 21-50 | 18-29 | 14 | 17 | 124.8 | 100.0 | 105.5 |
| May 15 | SAS | 109–139 | 40-106 | 12-34 | 17-21 | 5 | 9 | 103.8 | 133.7 | 104.5 |
| May 12 | @SAS | 97–126 | 32-83 | 9-33 | 24-30 | 13 | 10 | 94.2 | 122.3 | 103.0 |
| May 10 | SAS | 114–109 | 42-94 | 10-27 | 20-22 | 17 | 15 | 115.2 | 107.9 | 100.0 |
Off and Def are points scored and allowed per 100 possessions in each game; their averages are the 10-game ratings above. OREB is missing (–) where the source data didn't record it.
The result against the forecast
2026-27 surprise gamesSurprise is measured against this model's forecast, not against what other observers expected. Outcome surprise is −ln(winner's pregame probability): 0.69 for a coin flip, 2.3 for a 10% winner.
Team box score
What happened in the game. These numbers are not used by the forecast, and they are not offered as the reason it missed.
| Team stat | MIL | MIN |
|---|---|---|
| Final score | 100 | 112 |
| Field goals | 38–99 · 38.4% | 41–96 · 42.7% |
| Three-pointers | 15–49 · 30.6% | 16–45 · 35.6% |
| Free throws | 9–12 · 75.0% | 14–26 · 53.8% |
| Rebounds | 53 | 59 |
| Assists | 24 | 23 |
| Turnovers | 16 | 11 |
| Steals | 5 | 7 |
| Blocks | 8 | 9 |
How the model does with these teams over time: Milwaukee Bucks · Minnesota Timberwolves
Where the forecast differed from the result
| Measure | Forecast | Actual | Actual − forecast |
|---|---|---|---|
| Home margin (MIN) | +12 | +12 | ±0 |
| Total points | 232 | 212 | −20 |
| MIL points | 110 | 100 | −10 |
| MIN points | 122 | 112 | −10 |
Recent form before this game
Previous meetings
| Date | Matchup | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 13 2025-26 | MIN at MIL | MIN 139 – 106 MIL |
| Dec 21 2025-26 | MIL at MIN | MIL 100 – 103 MIN |
| Apr 8 2024-25 | MIN at MIL | MIN 103 – 110 MIL |
| Feb 12 2024-25 | MIL at MIN | MIL 103 – 101 MIN |
| Feb 23 2023-24 | MIL at MIN | MIL 112 – 107 MIN |