2023-24 · Regular Season · Final
Charlotte Hornets at Utah Jazz
Thursday, February 22, 2024 · tip-off time not recorded
CHA 3–1@UTA 1–2 records going into the game NBA.com recap ↗
Forecast and result
| Team | Projected | Final | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHA Charlotte Hornets | 114 | 115 | +1 |
| UTA Utah Jazz (home) | 124 | 107 | −17 |
Forecast: Utah Jazz to win, 73% win probability, projected margin 10.
Inside the Forecast
How the inputs are builtWhat the model received
| Input | CHA | UTA |
|---|---|---|
| Elo ratingMargin-of-victory Elo; 1500 is average. | 1297 | 1478 |
| Elo gap, home minus road, incl. home court | +252 | |
| Season scoring marginPoints per game, blended with last season early in the year. | −10.7 | −2.7 |
| Games played this season | 54 | 56 |
| Offensive rating, last 10Points scored per 100 possessions. | 109.0 | 119.4 |
| Defensive rating, last 10Points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better. | 116.2 | 127.2 |
| Combined pace, last 10Possessions per game, both teams. | 99.5 | |
| Rotation points missingPoints per game of rotation players listed Out or Doubtful. | 9.8 | 0.0 |
| Rest days | 5 | 5 |
| Second night of a back-to-back | No | No |
This forecast can't be broken down exactly: the model version that made this forecast is not available. Explanations are shown only when the model that made a forecast can be rebuilt and reproduces it. How explanations are checked
Built from the box scores
How the breakdowns workWhere each input came from. Open a row to see the games and box-score stats behind it. A breakdown is shown only when rebuilding it from the stored stats gives exactly the number the model received.
Elo ratingCHA1297UTA1478
Updated after every game from the final score only: wins, losses and margin. Each season starts by keeping 75% of last season's distance from the 1500 average.
CHA1297
- Ended last season at 1388 → started this one at 1416
- First 44 games: −147.8
- Last 10 games: +28.5
- LNYK92–113−3.9
- LCHI110–117−4.6
- L@OKC106–126−1.8
- LIND99–115−5.8
- LLAL118–124−3.7
- LTOR117–123−5.0
- L@MIL84–120−3.9
- WMEM115–106+13.8
- WIND111–102+18.1
- WATL122–99+25.3
UTA1478
- Ended last season at 1413 → started this one at 1435
- First 46 games: +101.3
- Last 10 games: −57.9
- W@CHA134–122+5.0
- L@BKN114–147−25.8
- L@NYK103–118−5.3
- LPHI124–127−6.3
- WMIL123–108+14.5
- WOKC124–117+9.9
- L@PHX115–129−7.7
- LGSW107–129−19.7
- LLAL122–138−17.2
- LGSW137–140−5.3
Season scoring marginCHA−10.7UTA−2.7
Points scored minus points allowed per game this season, mixed with last season's margin until 20 games are played.
CHA−10.7
Scores 108.6, allows 119.4 over 54 games: −10.7 a game.
UTA−2.7
Scores 118.0, allows 120.7 over 56 games: −2.7 a game.
Offensive rating, last 10CHA109.0UTA119.4
Points scored per 100 possessions. Split into the four factors: right of center helps the team, left hurts, in points per 100 possessions compared with the league average (2023-24 to date: 115.3).
CHA109.0scored, −6.2 vs league
| Factor | CHA | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 53.9% | 54.9% | −1.5 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 11.7% | 11.5% | −0.3 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 18.7% | 24.3% | −2.5 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.157 | 0.202 | −1.3 | |
| Everything else | −0.7 |
UTA119.4scored, +4.1 vs league
| Factor | UTA | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 55.8% | 54.9% | +1.4 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 12.7% | 11.5% | −1.6 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 31.8% | 24.3% | +3.4 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.207 | 0.202 | +0.2 | |
| Everything else | +0.9 |
Defensive rating, last 10CHA116.2UTA127.2
Points allowed per 100 possessions, built from what opponents did in those games. Bars point right when the defense held opponents below average. Split into the four factors: right of center helps the team, left hurts, in points per 100 possessions compared with the league average (2023-24 to date: 115.3).
CHA116.2allowed, +1.0 vs league
| Factor | Opponents | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 57.6% | 54.9% | −4.1 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 10.7% | 11.5% | −1.2 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 19.3% | 24.3% | +2.2 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.178 | 0.202 | +0.7 | |
| Everything else | +1.4 |
UTA127.2allowed, +11.9 vs league
| Factor | Opponents | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 59.9% | 54.9% | −7.5 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 8.6% | 11.5% | −4.2 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 23.0% | 24.3% | +0.6 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.174 | 0.202 | +0.8 | |
| Everything else | −1.6 |
Pace, last 10average 99.5
Possessions per 48 minutes. The model uses the average of the two teams. Faster games mean more points for both sides, so pace mostly moves the projected total, not the margin.
CHA 98.5 and UTA 100.5 → average 99.5 (league 2023-24 to date: 99.7)
Rotation points missingCHA9.8UTA0.0
Points per game of rotation players (two or more of the last 10 games this season, 15+ minutes) listed Out or Doubtful on the official injury report.
CHA9.8pts/g missing
| Player | Pts | Min | Games |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nick Smith Jr. | 6.5 | 16.1 | 8 |
| Leaky Black | 3.3 | 18.6 | 7 |
Source: official injury report, 2024-02-22 17:30 ET. 12 rotation players.
UTA0.0pts/g missing
Every rotation player was available.
Source: official injury report, 2024-02-22 17:30 ET. 8 rotation players.
RestCHA5 daysUTA5 days
Days since the team's previous game, capped at 5. One day means the second night of a back-to-back.
CHA5days
Last played Feb 14 against ATL (8 days, capped at 5).
UTA5days
Last played Feb 15 against GSW (7 days, capped at 5).
The last 10 games behind these numbers, box-score totals
CHA
| Date | Opp | Score | FG | 3P | FT | TOV | OREB | Off | Def | Pace |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14 | ATL | 122–99 | 44-89 | 15-37 | 19-20 | 12 | 12 | 124.5 | 101.0 | 98.0 |
| Feb 12 | IND | 111–102 | 44-82 | 10-34 | 13-16 | 16 | 5 | 111.0 | 102.0 | 100.0 |
| Feb 10 | MEM | 115–106 | 47-82 | 16-31 | 5-7 | 19 | 5 | 116.2 | 109.3 | 98.0 |
| Feb 9 | @MIL | 84–120 | 27-79 | 7-29 | 23-29 | 13 | 8 | 84.8 | 121.2 | 99.0 |
| Feb 7 | TOR | 117–123 | 44-90 | 16-39 | 13-20 | 10 | 9 | 121.9 | 126.8 | 96.5 |
| Feb 5 | LAL | 118–124 | 47-96 | 13-32 | 11-14 | 9 | 5 | 111.3 | 114.8 | 107.0 |
| Feb 4 | IND | 99–115 | 35-88 | 8-29 | 21-25 | 10 | 11 | 101.0 | 116.2 | 98.5 |
| Feb 2 | @OKC | 106–126 | 41-92 | 14-31 | 10-14 | 14 | 7 | 102.9 | 123.5 | 102.5 |
| Jan 31 | CHI | 110–117 | 40-90 | 16-46 | 14-17 | 9 | 9 | 115.8 | 123.2 | 95.0 |
| Jan 29 | NYK | 92–113 | 37-81 | 11-32 | 7-14 | 13 | 9 | 101.1 | 124.2 | 91.0 |
UTA
| Date | Opp | Score | FG | 3P | FT | TOV | OREB | Off | Def | Pace |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15 | GSW | 137–140 | 43-93 | 22-49 | 29-32 | 16 | 17 | 131.7 | 135.9 | 103.5 |
| Feb 14 | LAL | 122–138 | 49-101 | 14-45 | 10-13 | 13 | 15 | 118.4 | 136.6 | 102.0 |
| Feb 12 | GSW | 107–129 | 41-92 | 11-32 | 14-16 | 17 | 9 | 101.9 | 122.9 | 105.0 |
| Feb 8 | @PHX | 115–129 | 41-94 | 12-35 | 21-31 | 15 | 19 | 111.7 | 126.5 | 102.5 |
| Feb 6 | OKC | 124–117 | 46-89 | 14-35 | 18-20 | 17 | 15 | 125.3 | 119.4 | 98.5 |
| Feb 4 | MIL | 123–108 | 43-89 | 17-44 | 20-24 | 16 | 12 | 123.0 | 108.0 | 100.0 |
| Feb 1 | PHI | 124–127 | 45-87 | 12-36 | 22-25 | 9 | 10 | 126.5 | 129.6 | 98.0 |
| Jan 30 | @NYK | 103–118 | 39-86 | 12-36 | 13-17 | 14 | 15 | 112.0 | 131.1 | 91.0 |
| Jan 29 | @BKN | 114–147 | 39-86 | 9-27 | 27-34 | 17 | 12 | 109.6 | 141.3 | 104.0 |
| Jan 27 | @CHA | 134–122 | 52-93 | 17-41 | 13-17 | 13 | 15 | 134.0 | 120.8 | 100.5 |
Off and Def are points scored and allowed per 100 possessions in each game; their averages are the 10-game ratings above. OREB is missing (–) where the source data didn't record it.
The result against the forecast
2023-24 surprise gamesSurprise is measured against this model's forecast, not against what other observers expected. Outcome surprise is −ln(winner's pregame probability): 0.69 for a coin flip, 2.3 for a 10% winner.
Team box score
What happened in the game. These numbers are not used by the forecast, and they are not offered as the reason it missed.
| Team stat | CHA | UTA |
|---|---|---|
| Final score | 115 | 107 |
| Field goals | 40–92 · 43.5% | 37–86 · 43.0% |
| Three-pointers | 20–42 · 47.6% | 9–39 · 23.1% |
| Free throws | 15–22 · 68.2% | 24–27 · 88.9% |
| Rebounds | 42 | 54 |
| Assists | 28 | 26 |
| Turnovers | 9 | 19 |
| Steals | 11 | 3 |
| Blocks | 3 | 2 |
How the model does with these teams over time: Charlotte Hornets · Utah Jazz
Where the forecast differed from the result
| Measure | Forecast | Actual | Actual − forecast |
|---|---|---|---|
| Home margin (UTA) | +10 | −8 | −18 |
| Total points | 238 | 222 | −16 |
| CHA points | 114 | 115 | +1 |
| UTA points | 124 | 107 | −17 |
Score by quarter
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | OT | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHA | 34 | 22 | 29 | 30 | – | 115 |
| UTA | 26 | 26 | 38 | 17 | – | 107 |
Recent form before this game
Previous meetings
| Date | Matchup | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 27 2023-24 | UTA at CHA | UTA 134 – 122 CHA |
| Mar 11 2022-23 | UTA at CHA | UTA 119 – 111 CHA |
| Jan 23 2022-23 | CHA at UTA | CHA 102 – 120 UTA |
| Mar 25 2021-22 | UTA at CHA | UTA 101 – 107 CHA |
| Dec 20 2021-22 | CHA at UTA | CHA 102 – 112 UTA |