2025-26 · Regular Season · Final
Utah Jazz at Charlotte Hornets
Sunday, November 2, 2025 · tip-off 6:00 PM ET
UTA 1–0@CHA 0–0 records going into the game NBA.com recap ↗
Forecast and result
| Team | Projected | Final | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| UTA Utah Jazz | 119 | 103 | −16 |
| CHA Charlotte Hornets (home) | 111 | 126 | +15 |
Forecast: Utah Jazz to win, 71% win probability, projected margin 8.
Inside the Forecast
How the inputs are builtWhat the model received
| Input | UTA | CHA |
|---|---|---|
| Elo ratingMargin-of-victory Elo; 1500 is average. | 1359 | 1315 |
| Elo gap, home minus road, incl. home court | +26 | |
| Season scoring marginPoints per game, blended with last season early in the year. | −7.0 | −7.3 |
| Games played this season | 5 | 6 |
| Offensive rating, last 10Points scored per 100 possessions. | 114.3 | 108.3 |
| Defensive rating, last 10Points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better. | 122.3 | 120.2 |
| Combined pace, last 10Possessions per game, both teams. | 101.8 | |
| Rotation points missingPoints per game of rotation players listed Out or Doubtful. | 14.4 | 37.8 |
| Rest days | 2 | 1 |
| Second night of a back-to-back | No | Yes |
This forecast can't be broken down exactly: the model version that made this forecast is not available. Explanations are shown only when the model that made a forecast can be rebuilt and reproduces it. How explanations are checked
Built from the box scores
How the breakdowns workWhere each input came from. Open a row to see the games and box-score stats behind it. A breakdown is shown only when rebuilding it from the stored stats gives exactly the number the model received.
Elo ratingUTA1359CHA1315
Updated after every game from the final score only: wins, losses and margin. Each season starts by keeping 75% of last season's distance from the 1500 average.
UTA1359
- Ended last season at 1284 → started this one at 1338
- This season's 5 games: +21.1
- WLAC129–108+30.2
- L@SAC104–105−1.7
- WPHX138–134+6.3
- LPOR134–136−3.4
- L@PHX96–118−10.3
CHA1315
- Ended last season at 1237 → started this one at 1303
- This season's 6 games: +11.9
- WBKN136–117+14.0
- L@PHI121–125−4.1
- W@WAS139–113+25.3
- L@MIA117–144−6.7
- LORL107–123−11.1
- LMIN105–122−5.5
Season scoring marginUTA−7.0CHA−7.3
Points scored minus points allowed per game this season, mixed with last season's margin until 20 games are played.
UTA−7.0
Scores 120.2, allows 120.2 over 5 games: ±0.0 a game.
25% this season (±0.0) + 75% last season (−9.3) = −7.0
CHA−7.3
Scores 120.8, allows 124.0 over 6 games: −3.2 a game.
30% this season (−3.2) + 70% last season (−9.1) = −7.3
Offensive rating, last 10UTA114.3CHA108.3
Points scored per 100 possessions. Split into the four factors: right of center helps the team, left hurts, in points per 100 possessions compared with the league average (2024-25: 113.7).
UTA114.3scored, +0.6 vs league
| Factor | UTA | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 53.2% | 54.3% | −1.6 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 13.7% | 12.0% | −2.3 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 30.6% | 25.3% | +2.4 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.235 | 0.194 | +1.2 | |
| Everything else | +1.0 |
CHA108.3scored, −5.4 vs league
| Factor | CHA | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 53.2% | 54.3% | −1.7 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 14.4% | 12.0% | −3.4 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 23.4% | 25.3% | −0.8 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.198 | 0.194 | +0.1 | |
| Everything else | +0.5 |
Defensive rating, last 10UTA122.3CHA120.2
Points allowed per 100 possessions, built from what opponents did in those games. Bars point right when the defense held opponents below average. Split into the four factors: right of center helps the team, left hurts, in points per 100 possessions compared with the league average (2024-25: 113.7).
UTA122.3allowed, +8.6 vs league
| Factor | Opponents | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 58.2% | 54.3% | −5.8 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 10.5% | 12.0% | −2.1 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 27.1% | 25.3% | −0.8 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.180 | 0.194 | +0.4 | |
| Everything else | −0.3 |
CHA120.2allowed, +6.5 vs league
| Factor | Opponents | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 57.1% | 54.3% | −4.2 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 11.0% | 12.0% | −1.5 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 26.3% | 25.3% | −0.5 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.185 | 0.194 | +0.3 | |
| Everything else | −0.6 |
Pace, last 10average 101.8
Possessions per 48 minutes. The model uses the average of the two teams. Faster games mean more points for both sides, so pace mostly moves the projected total, not the margin.
UTA 102.3 and CHA 101.3 → average 101.8 (league 2024-25: 99.4)
Rotation points missingUTA14.4CHA37.8
Points per game of rotation players (two or more of the last 10 games this season, 15+ minutes) listed Out or Doubtful on the official injury report.
UTA14.4pts/g missing
| Player | Pts | Min | Games |
|---|---|---|---|
| Walker Kessler | 14.4 | 30.8 | 5 |
Source: official injury report, 2025-11-02 17:30 ET. 9 rotation players.
CHA37.8pts/g missing
| Player | Pts | Min | Games |
|---|---|---|---|
| LaMelo Ball | 23.3 | 33.3 | 6 |
| Brandon Miller | 14.5 | 19.9 | 2 |
Source: official injury report, 2025-11-02 17:30 ET. 9 rotation players.
RestUTA2 daysCHA1 days
Days since the team's previous game, capped at 5. One day means the second night of a back-to-back.
UTA2days
Last played Oct 31 against PHX.
CHA1day, back-to-back
Last played Nov 1 against MIN.
The last 10 games behind these numbers, box-score totals
UTA
| Date | Opp | Score | FG | 3P | FT | TOV | OREB | Off | Def | Pace |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31 | @PHX | 96–118 | 30-80 | 12-37 | 24-32 | 21 | 12 | 95.0 | 115.7 | 101.5 |
| Oct 29 | POR | 134–136 | 41-84 | 11-35 | 41-49 | 21 | 16 | 120.7 | 123.6 | 110.5 |
| Oct 27 | PHX | 138–134 | 44-108 | 16-49 | 34-36 | 18 | 28 | 121.1 | 117.5 | 103.2 |
| Oct 24 | @SAC | 104–105 | 38-86 | 13-41 | 15-17 | 19 | 11 | 105.1 | 108.2 | 98.0 |
| Oct 22 | LAC | 129–108 | 48-87 | 17-44 | 16-20 | 12 | 13 | 135.8 | 113.7 | 95.0 |
| Apr 13 | @MIN | 105–116 | 40-89 | 16-42 | 9-11 | 13 | 7 | 107.1 | 119.6 | 97.5 |
| Apr 11 | OKC | 111–145 | 39-103 | 17-63 | 16-20 | 16 | 13 | 102.8 | 135.5 | 107.5 |
| Apr 9 | POR | 133–126 | 50-98 | 15-36 | 18-22 | 24 | 13 | 113.7 | 107.7 | 106.0 |
| Apr 6 | @ATL | 134–147 | 45-87 | 20-47 | 24-28 | 10 | 7 | 132.7 | 144.1 | 101.5 |
| Apr 4 | @IND | 112–140 | 39-104 | 16-52 | 18-21 | 11 | 17 | 108.7 | 137.3 | 102.5 |
CHA
| Date | Opp | Score | FG | 3P | FT | TOV | OREB | Off | Def | Pace |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1 | MIN | 105–122 | 34-86 | 13-45 | 24-27 | 14 | 10 | 104.0 | 122.0 | 100.5 |
| Oct 30 | ORL | 107–123 | 42-83 | 11-30 | 12-15 | 21 | 12 | 111.5 | 128.1 | 96.0 |
| Oct 28 | @MIA | 117–144 | 40-90 | 18-45 | 19-23 | 17 | 9 | 109.3 | 133.3 | 107.5 |
| Oct 26 | @WAS | 139–113 | 47-92 | 15-38 | 30-36 | 11 | 11 | 127.5 | 104.6 | 108.5 |
| Oct 25 | @PHI | 121–125 | 43-89 | 16-42 | 19-28 | 16 | 13 | 117.5 | 120.2 | 103.5 |
| Oct 22 | BKN | 136–117 | 48-90 | 17-36 | 23-33 | 16 | 14 | 128.3 | 110.4 | 106.0 |
| Apr 13 | @BOS | 86–93 | 32-85 | 11-39 | 11-18 | 17 | 9 | 95.6 | 103.3 | 90.0 |
| Apr 11 | @BOS | 94–130 | 36-93 | 15-40 | 7-10 | 17 | 11 | 94.0 | 130.0 | 100.0 |
| Apr 9 | @TOR | 96–126 | 36-82 | 11-35 | 13-16 | 19 | 2 | 94.1 | 124.8 | 101.5 |
| Apr 8 | MEM | 100–124 | 37-81 | 11-38 | 15-23 | 15 | 4 | 101.0 | 125.3 | 99.0 |
Off and Def are points scored and allowed per 100 possessions in each game; their averages are the 10-game ratings above. OREB is missing (–) where the source data didn't record it.
The result against the forecast
2025-26 surprise gamesSurprise is measured against this model's forecast, not against what other observers expected. Outcome surprise is −ln(winner's pregame probability): 0.69 for a coin flip, 2.3 for a 10% winner.
Team box score
What happened in the game. These numbers are not used by the forecast, and they are not offered as the reason it missed.
| Team stat | UTA | CHA |
|---|---|---|
| Final score | 103 | 126 |
| Field goals | 36–88 · 40.9% | 43–88 · 48.9% |
| Three-pointers | 7–32 · 21.9% | 18–43 · 41.9% |
| Free throws | 24–29 · 82.8% | 22–22 · 100.0% |
| Rebounds | 38 | 46 |
| Assists | 27 | 31 |
| Turnovers | 10 | 14 |
| Steals | 7 | 6 |
| Blocks | 3 | 6 |
How the model does with these teams over time: Utah Jazz · Charlotte Hornets
Where the forecast differed from the result
| Measure | Forecast | Actual | Actual − forecast |
|---|---|---|---|
| Home margin (CHA) | −8 | +23 | +31 |
| Total points | 230 | 229 | −1 |
| UTA points | 119 | 103 | −16 |
| CHA points | 111 | 126 | +15 |
Recent form before this game
Previous meetings
| Date | Matchup | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 31 2024-25 | UTA at CHA | UTA 106 – 110 CHA |
| Jan 15 2024-25 | CHA at UTA | CHA 117 – 112 UTA |
| Feb 22 2023-24 | CHA at UTA | CHA 115 – 107 UTA |
| Jan 27 2023-24 | UTA at CHA | UTA 134 – 122 CHA |
| Mar 11 2022-23 | UTA at CHA | UTA 119 – 111 CHA |