2023-24 · Regular Season · Final
Portland Trail Blazers at Miami Heat
Friday, March 29, 2024 · tip-off time not recorded
POR 4–4@MIA 4–2 records going into the game NBA.com recap ↗
Forecast and result
| Team | Projected | Final | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| POR Portland Trail Blazers | 101 | 82 | −19 |
| MIA Miami Heat (home) | 108 | 142 | +34 |
Forecast: Miami Heat to win, 68% win probability, projected margin 7.
Inside the Forecast
How the inputs are builtWhat the model received
| Input | POR | MIA |
|---|---|---|
| Elo ratingMargin-of-victory Elo; 1500 is average. | 1311 | 1530 |
| Elo gap, home minus road, incl. home court | +289 | |
| Season scoring marginPoints per game, blended with last season early in the year. | −8.3 | +0.4 |
| Games played this season | 73 | 72 |
| Offensive rating, last 10Points scored per 100 possessions. | 107.5 | 107.6 |
| Defensive rating, last 10Points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better. | 118.4 | 109.2 |
| Combined pace, last 10Possessions per game, both teams. | 95.4 | |
| Rotation points missingPoints per game of rotation players listed Out or Doubtful. | 29.6 | 14.2 |
| Rest days | 2 | 3 |
| Second night of a back-to-back | No | No |
This forecast can't be broken down exactly: the model version that made this forecast is not available. Explanations are shown only when the model that made a forecast can be rebuilt and reproduces it. How explanations are checked
Built from the box scores
How the breakdowns workWhere each input came from. Open a row to see the games and box-score stats behind it. A breakdown is shown only when rebuilding it from the stored stats gives exactly the number the model received.
Elo ratingPOR1311MIA1530
Updated after every game from the final score only: wins, losses and margin. Each season starts by keeping 75% of last season's distance from the 1500 average.
POR1311
- Ended last season at 1315 → started this one at 1362
- First 63 games: −22.0
- Last 10 games: −28.6
- LBOS99–121−3.6
- WATL106–102+7.7
- LNYK93–105−6.7
- L@NOP107–126−2.9
- L@CHI107–110−2.2
- LLAC103–116−6.2
- LLAC117–125−4.3
- LDEN111–114−1.7
- L@HOU92–110−4.2
- L@ATL106–120−4.5
MIA1530
- Ended last season at 1600 → started this one at 1575
- First 62 games: −8.4
- Last 10 games: −37.2
- L@OKC100–107−5.1
- LWAS108–110−11.9
- LDEN88–100−11.2
- W@DET108–95+6.3
- W@DET104–101+2.7
- L@PHI91–98−9.3
- W@CLE107–104+8.3
- LNOP88–111−18.5
- WCLE121–84+23.4
- LGSW92–113−21.9
Season scoring marginPOR−8.3MIA+0.4
Points scored minus points allowed per game this season, mixed with last season's margin until 20 games are played.
POR−8.3
Scores 107.6, allows 115.8 over 73 games: −8.3 a game.
MIA+0.4
Scores 109.3, allows 108.9 over 72 games: +0.4 a game.
Offensive rating, last 10POR107.5MIA107.6
Points scored per 100 possessions. Split into the four factors: right of center helps the team, left hurts, in points per 100 possessions compared with the league average (2023-24 to date: 114.8).
POR107.5scored, −7.3 vs league
| Factor | POR | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 52.5% | 54.8% | −3.4 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 14.1% | 11.5% | −3.7 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 25.4% | 24.2% | +0.6 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.155 | 0.196 | −1.2 | |
| Everything else | +0.4 |
MIA107.6scored, −7.2 vs league
| Factor | MIA | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 50.1% | 54.8% | −7.1 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 8.7% | 11.5% | +4.0 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 21.5% | 24.2% | −1.2 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.159 | 0.196 | −1.1 | |
| Everything else | −1.9 |
Defensive rating, last 10POR118.4MIA109.2
Points allowed per 100 possessions, built from what opponents did in those games. Bars point right when the defense held opponents below average. Split into the four factors: right of center helps the team, left hurts, in points per 100 possessions compared with the league average (2023-24 to date: 114.8).
POR118.4allowed, +3.6 vs league
| Factor | Opponents | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 54.8% | 54.8% | −0.0 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 10.2% | 11.5% | −1.9 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 28.1% | 24.2% | −1.8 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.192 | 0.196 | +0.1 | |
| Everything else | −0.1 |
MIA109.2allowed, −5.6 vs league
| Factor | Opponents | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 55.1% | 54.8% | −0.5 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 12.3% | 11.5% | +1.0 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 18.2% | 24.2% | +2.7 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.149 | 0.196 | +1.3 | |
| Everything else | +1.1 |
Pace, last 10average 95.4
Possessions per 48 minutes. The model uses the average of the two teams. Faster games mean more points for both sides, so pace mostly moves the projected total, not the margin.
POR 97.0 and MIA 93.8 → average 95.4 (league 2023-24 to date: 99.2)
Rotation points missingPOR29.6MIA14.2
Points per game of rotation players (two or more of the last 10 games this season, 15+ minutes) listed Out or Doubtful on the official injury report.
POR29.6pts/g missing
| Player | Pts | Min | Games |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anfernee Simons | 20.8 | 33.6 | 6 |
| Toumani Camara | 8.8 | 29.2 | 10 |
Source: official injury report, 2024-03-29 17:30 ET. 10 rotation players.
MIA14.2pts/g missing
| Player | Pts | Min | Games |
|---|---|---|---|
| Duncan Robinson | 14.2 | 30.8 | 6 |
Source: official injury report, 2024-03-29 17:30 ET. 10 rotation players.
RestPOR2 daysMIA3 days
Days since the team's previous game, capped at 5. One day means the second night of a back-to-back.
POR2days
Last played Mar 27 against ATL.
MIA3days
Last played Mar 26 against GSW.
The last 10 games behind these numbers, box-score totals
POR
| Date | Opp | Score | FG | 3P | FT | TOV | OREB | Off | Def | Pace |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27 | @ATL | 106–120 | 43-85 | 14-31 | 6-10 | 18 | 4 | 107.1 | 120.0 | 99.5 |
| Mar 25 | @HOU | 92–110 | 36-87 | 7-33 | 13-15 | 16 | 7 | 92.9 | 112.2 | 98.5 |
| Mar 23 | DEN | 111–114 | 43-93 | 10-28 | 15-17 | 15 | 11 | 113.3 | 115.2 | 98.5 |
| Mar 22 | LAC | 117–125 | 45-93 | 12-33 | 15-25 | 10 | 10 | 119.4 | 127.6 | 98.0 |
| Mar 20 | LAC | 103–116 | 39-81 | 15-34 | 10-15 | 17 | 8 | 106.2 | 119.6 | 97.0 |
| Mar 18 | @CHI | 107–110 | 40-88 | 8-28 | 19-25 | 13 | 13 | 110.3 | 113.4 | 97.0 |
| Mar 16 | @NOP | 107–126 | 42-84 | 12-33 | 11-12 | 19 | 10 | 110.3 | 128.6 | 97.5 |
| Mar 14 | NYK | 93–105 | 34-84 | 11-33 | 14-16 | 17 | 13 | 96.9 | 109.4 | 96.0 |
| Mar 13 | ATL | 106–102 | 38-82 | 10-30 | 20-24 | 18 | 12 | 109.3 | 105.2 | 97.0 |
| Mar 11 | BOS | 99–121 | 39-87 | 10-28 | 11-11 | 11 | 9 | 108.8 | 133.0 | 91.0 |
MIA
| Date | Opp | Score | FG | 3P | FT | TOV | OREB | Off | Def | Pace |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26 | GSW | 92–113 | 37-92 | 8-33 | 10-13 | 8 | 10 | 98.9 | 121.5 | 93.0 |
| Mar 24 | CLE | 121–84 | 43-83 | 15-38 | 20-23 | 9 | 9 | 128.7 | 88.4 | 94.5 |
| Mar 22 | NOP | 88–111 | 31-86 | 13-47 | 13-15 | 4 | 6 | 98.9 | 124.7 | 89.0 |
| Mar 20 | @CLE | 107–104 | 38-83 | 13-36 | 18-19 | 7 | 7 | 121.6 | 115.6 | 89.0 |
| Mar 18 | @PHI | 91–98 | 35-89 | 12-33 | 9-14 | 15 | 11 | 94.8 | 102.1 | 96.0 |
| Mar 17 | @DET | 104–101 | 40-89 | 12-35 | 12-16 | 9 | 11 | 109.5 | 107.4 | 94.5 |
| Mar 15 | @DET | 108–95 | 43-91 | 7-34 | 15-21 | 8 | 9 | 110.2 | 96.9 | 98.0 |
| Mar 13 | DEN | 88–100 | 34-80 | 5-21 | 15-18 | 8 | 8 | 96.7 | 112.4 | 90.0 |
| Mar 10 | WAS | 108–110 | 43-95 | 10-33 | 12-18 | 13 | 16 | 110.2 | 111.1 | 98.5 |
| Mar 8 | @OKC | 100–107 | 38-82 | 11-29 | 13-18 | 10 | 7 | 106.4 | 111.5 | 95.0 |
Off and Def are points scored and allowed per 100 possessions in each game; their averages are the 10-game ratings above. OREB is missing (–) where the source data didn't record it.
The result against the forecast
2023-24 surprise gamesSurprise is measured against this model's forecast, not against what other observers expected. Outcome surprise is −ln(winner's pregame probability): 0.69 for a coin flip, 2.3 for a 10% winner.
Team box score
What happened in the game. These numbers are not used by the forecast, and they are not offered as the reason it missed.
| Team stat | POR | MIA |
|---|---|---|
| Final score | 82 | 142 |
| Field goals | 35–87 · 40.2% | 54–92 · 58.7% |
| Three-pointers | 5–30 · 16.7% | 21–39 · 53.8% |
| Free throws | 7–11 · 63.6% | 13–18 · 72.2% |
| Rebounds | 43 | 44 |
| Assists | 20 | 41 |
| Turnovers | 23 | 8 |
| Steals | 4 | 17 |
| Blocks | 2 | 4 |
How the model does with these teams over time: Portland Trail Blazers · Miami Heat
Where the forecast differed from the result
| Measure | Forecast | Actual | Actual − forecast |
|---|---|---|---|
| Home margin (MIA) | +7 | +60 | +53 |
| Total points | 209 | 224 | +15 |
| POR points | 101 | 82 | −19 |
| MIA points | 108 | 142 | +34 |
Score by quarter
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | OT | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| POR | 19 | 21 | 23 | 19 | – | 82 |
| MIA | 29 | 45 | 33 | 35 | – | 142 |
Recent form before this game
Previous meetings
| Date | Matchup | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 27 2023-24 | MIA at POR | MIA 106 – 96 POR |
| Nov 7 2022-23 | POR at MIA | POR 110 – 107 MIA |
| Oct 26 2022-23 | MIA at POR | MIA 119 – 98 POR |
| Jan 19 2021-22 | POR at MIA | POR 92 – 104 MIA |
| Jan 5 2021-22 | MIA at POR | MIA 115 – 109 POR |