2023-24 · Regular Season · Final
Minnesota Timberwolves at Portland Trail Blazers
Thursday, February 15, 2024 · tip-off time not recorded
MIN 0–1@POR 4–3 records going into the game NBA.com recap ↗
Forecast and result
| Team | Projected | Final | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MIN Minnesota Timberwolves | 113 | 128 | +15 |
| POR Portland Trail Blazers (home) | 109 | 91 | −18 |
Forecast: Minnesota Timberwolves to win, 53% win probability, projected margin 4.
Inside the Forecast
How the inputs are builtWhat the model received
| Input | MIN | POR |
|---|---|---|
| Elo ratingMargin-of-victory Elo; 1500 is average. | 1662 | 1334 |
| Elo gap, home minus road, incl. home court | −258 | |
| Season scoring marginPoints per game, blended with last season early in the year. | +6.7 | −8.3 |
| Games played this season | 54 | 53 |
| Offensive rating, last 10Points scored per 100 possessions. | 119.0 | 114.2 |
| Defensive rating, last 10Points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better. | 107.6 | 117.7 |
| Combined pace, last 10Possessions per game, both teams. | 95.3 | |
| Rotation points missingPoints per game of rotation players listed Out or Doubtful. | 0.0 | 16.8 |
| Rest days | 2 | 2 |
| Second night of a back-to-back | No | No |
This forecast can't be broken down exactly: the model version that made this forecast is not available. Explanations are shown only when the model that made a forecast can be rebuilt and reproduces it. How explanations are checked
Built from the box scores
How the breakdowns workWhere each input came from. Open a row to see the games and box-score stats behind it. A breakdown is shown only when rebuilding it from the stored stats gives exactly the number the model received.
Elo ratingMIN1662POR1334
Updated after every game from the final score only: wins, losses and margin. Each season starts by keeping 75% of last season's distance from the 1500 average.
MIN1662
- Ended last season at 1504 → started this one at 1503
- First 44 games: +108.8
- Last 10 games: +49.9
- W@BKN96–94+3.3
- L@SAS112–113−7.9
- W@OKC107–101+10.7
- WDAL121–87+8.6
- LORL106–108−8.7
- WHOU111–90+6.5
- L@CHI123–129−10.1
- W@MIL129–105+20.6
- W@LAC121–100+23.2
- W@POR121–109+3.7
POR1334
- Ended last season at 1315 → started this one at 1362
- First 43 games: −45.0
- Last 10 games: +17.5
- W@HOU137–131+14.3
- L@SAS100–116−12.0
- LCHI96–104−6.0
- WPHI130–104+36.7
- WMIL119–116+9.5
- L@DEN108–120−2.4
- L@DEN103–112−2.0
- LDET122–128−12.4
- LNOP84–93−4.5
- LMIN109–121−3.7
Season scoring marginMIN+6.7POR−8.3
Points scored minus points allowed per game this season, mixed with last season's margin until 20 games are played.
MIN+6.7
Scores 113.7, allows 107.0 over 54 games: +6.7 a game.
POR−8.3
Scores 108.2, allows 116.5 over 53 games: −8.3 a game.
Offensive rating, last 10MIN119.0POR114.2
Points scored per 100 possessions. Split into the four factors: right of center helps the team, left hurts, in points per 100 possessions compared with the league average (2023-24 to date: 115.3).
MIN119.0scored, +3.7 vs league
| Factor | MIN | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 58.5% | 54.9% | +5.4 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 11.9% | 11.5% | −0.5 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 24.0% | 24.3% | −0.1 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.200 | 0.202 | −0.1 | |
| Everything else | −1.0 |
POR114.2scored, −1.1 vs league
| Factor | POR | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 52.8% | 54.9% | −3.2 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 12.0% | 11.5% | −0.7 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 26.9% | 24.3% | +1.2 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.230 | 0.202 | +0.8 | |
| Everything else | +0.8 |
Defensive rating, last 10MIN107.6POR117.7
Points allowed per 100 possessions, built from what opponents did in those games. Bars point right when the defense held opponents below average. Split into the four factors: right of center helps the team, left hurts, in points per 100 possessions compared with the league average (2023-24 to date: 115.3).
MIN107.6allowed, −7.6 vs league
| Factor | Opponents | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 51.4% | 54.9% | +5.3 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 12.7% | 11.5% | +1.7 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 23.5% | 24.3% | +0.3 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.212 | 0.202 | −0.3 | |
| Everything else | +0.7 |
POR117.7allowed, +2.5 vs league
| Factor | Opponents | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 54.3% | 54.9% | +0.9 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 10.4% | 11.5% | −1.6 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 28.1% | 24.3% | −1.7 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.212 | 0.202 | −0.3 | |
| Everything else | +0.3 |
Pace, last 10average 95.3
Possessions per 48 minutes. The model uses the average of the two teams. Faster games mean more points for both sides, so pace mostly moves the projected total, not the margin.
MIN 95.5 and POR 95.1 → average 95.3 (league 2023-24 to date: 99.7)
Rotation points missingMIN0.0POR16.8
Points per game of rotation players (two or more of the last 10 games this season, 15+ minutes) listed Out or Doubtful on the official injury report.
MIN0.0pts/g missing
Every rotation player was available.
Source: official injury report, 2024-02-15 17:30 ET. 9 rotation players.
POR16.8pts/g missing
| Player | Pts | Min | Games |
|---|---|---|---|
| Malcolm Brogdon | 16.8 | 36.7 | 5 |
Source: official injury report, 2024-02-15 17:30 ET. 11 rotation players.
RestMIN2 daysPOR2 days
Days since the team's previous game, capped at 5. One day means the second night of a back-to-back.
MIN2days
Last played Feb 13 against POR.
POR2days
Last played Feb 13 against MIN.
The last 10 games behind these numbers, box-score totals
MIN
| Date | Opp | Score | FG | 3P | FT | TOV | OREB | Off | Def | Pace |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13 | @POR | 121–109 | 39-84 | 13-33 | 30-34 | 12 | 12 | 121.0 | 110.1 | 99.5 |
| Feb 12 | @LAC | 121–100 | 46-86 | 11-34 | 18-19 | 11 | 9 | 127.4 | 104.2 | 95.5 |
| Feb 8 | @MIL | 129–105 | 48-87 | 21-41 | 12-16 | 8 | 12 | 141.8 | 116.7 | 90.5 |
| Feb 6 | @CHI | 123–129 | 42-92 | 20-45 | 19-26 | 13 | 10 | 118.3 | 121.7 | 95.1 |
| Feb 4 | HOU | 111–90 | 40-90 | 11-30 | 20-27 | 15 | 11 | 107.8 | 89.1 | 102.0 |
| Feb 2 | ORL | 106–108 | 38-82 | 12-38 | 18-20 | 17 | 6 | 106.0 | 106.9 | 100.5 |
| Jan 31 | DAL | 121–87 | 45-80 | 13-30 | 18-30 | 10 | 9 | 127.4 | 92.6 | 94.5 |
| Jan 29 | @OKC | 107–101 | 40-83 | 14-29 | 13-15 | 13 | 9 | 113.8 | 109.8 | 93.0 |
| Jan 27 | @SAS | 112–113 | 45-79 | 14-26 | 8-15 | 13 | 7 | 121.7 | 122.8 | 92.0 |
| Jan 25 | @BKN | 96–94 | 37-75 | 10-21 | 12-16 | 14 | 5 | 104.3 | 102.2 | 92.0 |
POR
| Date | Opp | Score | FG | 3P | FT | TOV | OREB | Off | Def | Pace |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13 | MIN | 109–121 | 39-87 | 11-29 | 20-25 | 16 | 12 | 110.1 | 121.0 | 99.5 |
| Feb 10 | NOP | 84–93 | 33-76 | 6-21 | 12-17 | 17 | 11 | 97.7 | 106.9 | 86.5 |
| Feb 8 | DET | 122–128 | 41-89 | 11-30 | 29-33 | 15 | 11 | 115.1 | 121.9 | 95.5 |
| Feb 4 | @DEN | 103–112 | 39-85 | 11-31 | 14-15 | 13 | 15 | 115.7 | 124.4 | 89.5 |
| Feb 2 | @DEN | 108–120 | 37-80 | 10-28 | 24-30 | 8 | 13 | 118.7 | 130.4 | 91.5 |
| Jan 31 | MIL | 119–116 | 49-92 | 12-28 | 9-9 | 11 | 9 | 121.4 | 118.4 | 98.0 |
| Jan 29 | PHI | 130–104 | 46-84 | 12-28 | 26-29 | 13 | 11 | 134.0 | 107.2 | 97.0 |
| Jan 28 | CHI | 96–104 | 32-79 | 6-33 | 26-29 | 13 | 7 | 102.1 | 109.5 | 94.5 |
| Jan 26 | @SAS | 100–116 | 38-90 | 10-37 | 14-19 | 13 | 8 | 96.2 | 111.5 | 104.0 |
| Jan 24 | @HOU | 137–131 | 50-98 | 15-35 | 22-24 | 12 | 13 | 130.5 | 126.0 | 94.6 |
Off and Def are points scored and allowed per 100 possessions in each game; their averages are the 10-game ratings above. OREB is missing (–) where the source data didn't record it.
The result against the forecast
2023-24 surprise gamesSurprise is measured against this model's forecast, not against what other observers expected. Outcome surprise is −ln(winner's pregame probability): 0.69 for a coin flip, 2.3 for a 10% winner.
Team box score
What happened in the game. These numbers are not used by the forecast, and they are not offered as the reason it missed.
| Team stat | MIN | POR |
|---|---|---|
| Final score | 128 | 91 |
| Field goals | 46–89 · 51.7% | 31–83 · 37.3% |
| Three-pointers | 11–30 · 36.7% | 8–29 · 27.6% |
| Free throws | 25–27 · 92.6% | 21–30 · 70.0% |
| Rebounds | 52 | 35 |
| Assists | 24 | 18 |
| Turnovers | 13 | 15 |
| Steals | 8 | 8 |
| Blocks | 5 | 5 |
How the model does with these teams over time: Minnesota Timberwolves · Portland Trail Blazers
Where the forecast differed from the result
| Measure | Forecast | Actual | Actual − forecast |
|---|---|---|---|
| Home margin (POR) | −4 | −37 | −33 |
| Total points | 222 | 219 | −3 |
| MIN points | 113 | 128 | +15 |
| POR points | 109 | 91 | −18 |
Score by quarter
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | OT | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIN | 44 | 22 | 33 | 29 | – | 128 |
| POR | 14 | 37 | 25 | 15 | – | 91 |
Recent form before this game
Previous meetings
| Date | Matchup | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 13 2023-24 | MIN at POR | MIN 121 – 109 POR |
| Jan 12 2023-24 | POR at MIN | POR 93 – 116 MIN |
| Apr 2 2022-23 | POR at MIN | POR 107 – 105 MIN |
| Jan 4 2022-23 | POR at MIN | POR 106 – 113 MIN |
| Dec 12 2022-23 | MIN at POR | MIN 112 – 133 POR |