2026-27 · Regular Season · Final
Los Angeles Lakers at Golden State Warriors
Friday, October 30, 2026 · tip-off 10:00 PM ET
LAL 4–1@GSW 2–3 records going into the game NBA.com recap ↗
Forecast and result
| Team | Projected | Final | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| LAL Los Angeles Lakers | 116 | 95 | −21 |
| GSW Golden State Warriors (home) | 114 | 112 | −2 |
Forecast: Los Angeles Lakers to win, 56% win probability, projected margin 2.
Inside the Forecast
How the inputs are builtWhy the model leans LAL
- Home court+2.1 GSWWhat the model gives the home team on an average night.
- Team strength+3.8 LALElo GSW 1465, LAL 1585; season margin GSW −0.9, LAL +3.2.
- Recent form+0.7 LALLast 10 games, per 100 possessions: GSW scores 116.3 and allows 119.8; LAL scores 115.5 and allows 114.6.
Together: LAL by 2, a 56% chance. Smaller inputs make up the rest; the chart below has all of them.
Team-by-team notes from the box scores
LAL is 4–1, winning by 10 a game on average (scoring 123, allowing 114). Last season they were a +1 team, which still counts for 75% of their season margin. Their offense turns it over on 15.1% of possessions (league 12.2%), which alone costs about 4 points per 100 possessions. Smaller factors: shooting +4, getting to the line +1.3. Their defense forces turnovers on 13.7% of opponent possessions (league 12.2%), which alone adds about 2.1 points per 100 possessions. Smaller factors: shooting defense −1.4. Ziaire Williams (11 ppg) is out.
GSW is 2–3, losing by 2 a game on average (scoring 118, allowing 119). Last season they were a −1 team, which still counts for 75% of their season margin. Their offense turns it over on 13.8% of possessions (league 12.2%), which alone costs about 2.3 points per 100 possessions. Smaller factors: getting to the line +1.4, offensive rebounding +1.1. Their defense lets opponents shoot 59% eFG against a 55% league average, which alone costs about 7 points per 100 possessions. Smaller factors: forcing turnovers +2.5, defensive rebounding −1.4.
Written from the numbers in Built from the box scores, using only values that rebuild exactly.
How the projected margin was built
Points of home margin. Right of zero favors GSW; left favors LAL.
Every input the model received, with its effect
| Input | LAL | GSW | Effect, pts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elo ratingMargin-of-victory Elo; 1500 is average. | 1585 | 1465 | −0.1 |
| Elo gap, home minus road, incl. home court | −50 | −2.7 | |
| Season scoring marginPoints per game, blended with last season early in the year. | +3.2 | −0.9 | −0.8 |
| Games played this season | 5 | 5 | −0.3 |
| Offensive rating, last 10Points scored per 100 possessions. | 115.5 | 116.3 | +0.3 |
| Defensive rating, last 10Points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better. | 114.6 | 119.8 | −0.8 |
| Combined pace, last 10Possessions per game, both teams. | 98.2 | −0.1 | |
| Rotation points missingPoints per game of rotation players listed Out or Doubtful. | 11.3 | 0.0 | +0.3 |
| Rest days | 2 | 2 | −0.0 |
| Second night of a back-to-back | No | No | +0.0 |
All 21 raw inputs, in points for each team
| Input | Value | GSW pts | LAL pts | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elo gap incl. home court | -50.2 | −0.95 | +1.72 | −2.67 |
| Defensive rating, last 10 (home) | 119.8 | +0.25 | +1.61 | −1.36 |
| Rotation points missing (home) | 0.0 | +0.75 | −0.08 | +0.84 |
| Season scoring margin (home) | -0.9 | −0.39 | +0.26 | −0.65 |
| Rotation points missing (away) | 11.3 | −0.06 | +0.52 | −0.58 |
| Defensive rating, last 10 (away) | 114.6 | +0.56 | +0.01 | +0.55 |
| Games played (away) | 5.0 | +0.17 | +0.60 | −0.43 |
| Offensive rating, last 10 (home) | 116.3 | +0.24 | −0.05 | +0.29 |
| Home series wins | 0.0 | +0.36 | +0.11 | +0.24 |
| Season scoring margin (away) | 3.2 | +0.08 | +0.23 | −0.16 |
| Combined pace, last 10 | 98.2 | −1.74 | −1.61 | −0.13 |
| Elo rating (home) | 1465.3 | −0.09 | +0.04 | −0.12 |
| Games played (home) | 5.0 | +0.12 | +0.01 | +0.11 |
| Elo rating (away) | 1585.5 | +0.12 | +0.05 | +0.07 |
| Series pressure | 0.0 | +0.05 | −0.01 | +0.06 |
| Back-to-back (home) | 0 | +0.04 | −0.00 | +0.05 |
| Offensive rating, last 10 (away) | 115.5 | +0.04 | +0.07 | −0.03 |
| Rest days (away) | 2.0 | −0.01 | +0.01 | −0.03 |
| Elimination game | 0 | ±0.00 | −0.01 | +0.01 |
| Rest days (home) | 2.0 | +0.01 | +0.01 | +0.00 |
| Back-to-back (away) | 0 | ±0.00 | ±0.00 | ±0.00 |
| Baseline (average output) | 114.4 | 112.4 | +2.10 |
Built from the box scores
How the breakdowns workWhere each input came from. Open a row to see the games and box-score stats behind it. A breakdown is shown only when rebuilding it from the stored stats gives exactly the number the model received.
Elo ratingLAL1585GSW14652.7 pts toward LAL
Updated after every game from the final score only: wins, losses and margin. Each season starts by keeping 75% of last season's distance from the 1500 average.
LAL1585
- Ended last season at 1586 → started this one at 1564
- This season's 5 games: +21.2
- WGSW127–105+7.5
- WLAC125–117+5.9
- W@UTA132–123+4.5
- LPOR129–136−12.2
- W@LAC103–87+15.5
GSW1465
- Ended last season at 1422 → started this one at 1442
- This season's 5 games: +23.7
- L@LAL105–127−7.5
- LMEM108–111−9.2
- L@PHX122–131−5.2
- W@DEN134–114+32.3
- W@MIN119–114+13.3
Season scoring marginLAL+3.2GSW−0.91.1 pts toward LAL
Points scored minus points allowed per game this season, mixed with last season's margin until 20 games are played.
LAL+3.2
Scores 123.2, allows 113.6 over 5 games: +9.6 a game.
25% this season (+9.6) + 75% last season (+1.0) = +3.2
GSW−0.9
Scores 117.6, allows 119.4 over 5 games: −1.8 a game.
25% this season (−1.8) + 75% last season (−0.6) = −0.9
Offensive rating, last 10LAL115.5GSW116.30.3 pts toward GSW
Points scored per 100 possessions. Split into the four factors: right of center helps the team, left hurts, in points per 100 possessions compared with the league average (2025-26: 114.6).
LAL115.5scored, +0.9 vs league
| Factor | LAL | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 57.3% | 54.5% | +4.2 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 15.1% | 12.2% | −4.2 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 26.0% | 26.1% | −0.0 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.255 | 0.210 | +1.3 | |
| Everything else | −0.3 |
GSW116.3scored, +1.7 vs league
| Factor | GSW | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 54.1% | 54.5% | −0.6 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 13.8% | 12.2% | −2.3 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 28.5% | 26.1% | +1.1 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.260 | 0.210 | +1.4 | |
| Everything else | +2.0 |
Defensive rating, last 10LAL114.6GSW119.80.8 pts toward LAL
Points allowed per 100 possessions, built from what opponents did in those games. Bars point right when the defense held opponents below average. Split into the four factors: right of center helps the team, left hurts, in points per 100 possessions compared with the league average (2025-26: 114.6).
LAL114.6allowed, ±0.0 vs league
| Factor | Opponents | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 55.4% | 54.5% | −1.4 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 13.7% | 12.2% | +2.1 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 27.5% | 26.1% | −0.6 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.228 | 0.210 | −0.5 | |
| Everything else | +0.4 |
GSW119.8allowed, +5.2 vs league
| Factor | Opponents | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 59.2% | 54.5% | −7.1 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 13.9% | 12.2% | +2.5 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 29.3% | 26.1% | −1.4 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.200 | 0.210 | +0.3 | |
| Everything else | +0.6 |
Pace, last 10average 98.20.1 pts toward LAL
Possessions per 48 minutes. The model uses the average of the two teams. Faster games mean more points for both sides, so pace mostly moves the projected total, not the margin.
LAL 97.8 and GSW 98.5 → average 98.2 (league 2025-26: 100.0)
Rotation points missingLAL11.3GSW0.00.3 pts toward GSW
Points per game of rotation players (two or more of the last 10 games this season, 15+ minutes) listed Out or Doubtful on the official injury report.
LAL11.3pts/g missing
| Player | Pts | Min | Games |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ziaire Williams | 11.2 | 28.4 | 4 |
Source: official injury report, 2026-10-30 17:30 ET. 9 rotation players.
GSW0.0pts/g missing
Every rotation player was available.
Source: official injury report, 2026-10-30 17:30 ET. 10 rotation players.
RestLAL2 daysGSW2 daysno effect on the margin
Days since the team's previous game, capped at 5. One day means the second night of a back-to-back.
LAL2days
Last played Oct 28 against LAC.
GSW2days
Last played Oct 28 against MIN.
The last 10 games behind these numbers, box-score totals
LAL
| Date | Opp | Score | FG | 3P | FT | TOV | OREB | Off | Def | Pace |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28 | @LAC | 103–87 | 35-79 | 9-31 | 24-33 | 19 | 17 | 105.1 | 89.7 | 97.5 |
| Oct 27 | POR | 129–136 | 45-80 | 17-43 | 22-30 | 15 | 6 | 129.0 | 133.3 | 101.0 |
| Oct 25 | @UTA | 132–123 | 40-82 | 20-47 | 32-38 | 10 | 5 | 130.7 | 120.6 | 101.5 |
| Oct 23 | LAC | 125–117 | 46-79 | 14-32 | 19-25 | 21 | 8 | 122.5 | 113.6 | 102.5 |
| Oct 21 | GSW | 127–105 | 46-81 | 11-28 | 24-27 | 18 | 10 | 124.5 | 102.9 | 102.0 |
| May 11 | OKC | 110–115 | 38-75 | 10-28 | 24-27 | 19 | 7 | 112.2 | 117.3 | 98.0 |
| May 9 | OKC | 108–131 | 38-81 | 14-30 | 18-25 | 16 | 14 | 117.4 | 140.9 | 92.5 |
| May 7 | @OKC | 107–125 | 39-78 | 11-29 | 18-21 | 20 | 10 | 111.5 | 127.6 | 97.0 |
| May 5 | @OKC | 90–108 | 35-85 | 10-30 | 10-13 | 17 | 12 | 95.7 | 116.1 | 93.5 |
| May 1 | @HOU | 98–78 | 36-89 | 12-28 | 14-24 | 10 | 15 | 106.5 | 83.9 | 92.5 |
GSW
| Date | Opp | Score | FG | 3P | FT | TOV | OREB | Off | Def | Pace |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28 | @MIN | 119–114 | 39-89 | 11-35 | 30-37 | 17 | 13 | 110.2 | 105.6 | 108.0 |
| Oct 26 | @DEN | 134–114 | 46-85 | 22-44 | 20-21 | 17 | 13 | 139.6 | 117.5 | 96.5 |
| Oct 24 | @PHX | 122–131 | 41-91 | 17-39 | 23-32 | 16 | 19 | 119.6 | 129.7 | 101.5 |
| Oct 23 | MEM | 108–111 | 34-83 | 14-41 | 26-29 | 19 | 18 | 108.0 | 112.1 | 99.5 |
| Oct 21 | @LAL | 105–127 | 38-92 | 8-36 | 21-27 | 15 | 15 | 102.9 | 124.5 | 102.0 |
| Apr 12 | @LAC | 110–115 | 36-86 | 11-39 | 27-32 | 9 | 13 | 117.0 | 121.1 | 94.5 |
| Apr 10 | @SAC | 118–124 | 39-81 | 14-36 | 26-28 | 16 | 5 | 115.7 | 121.6 | 102.0 |
| Apr 9 | LAL | 103–119 | 41-81 | 9-30 | 12-12 | 19 | 9 | 112.0 | 129.3 | 92.0 |
| Apr 7 | SAC | 110–105 | 37-82 | 17-38 | 19-24 | 17 | 10 | 114.6 | 111.7 | 95.0 |
| Apr 5 | HOU | 116–117 | 42-84 | 14-40 | 18-20 | 10 | 6 | 123.4 | 124.5 | 94.0 |
Off and Def are points scored and allowed per 100 possessions in each game; their averages are the 10-game ratings above. OREB is missing (–) where the source data didn't record it.
The result against the forecast
2026-27 surprise gamesSurprise is measured against this model's forecast, not against what other observers expected. Outcome surprise is −ln(winner's pregame probability): 0.69 for a coin flip, 2.3 for a 10% winner.
Team box score
What happened in the game. These numbers are not used by the forecast, and they are not offered as the reason it missed.
| Team stat | LAL | GSW |
|---|---|---|
| Final score | 95 | 112 |
| Field goals | 33–82 · 40.2% | 38–89 · 42.7% |
| Three-pointers | 11–39 · 28.2% | 22–46 · 47.8% |
| Free throws | 18–24 · 75.0% | 14–17 · 82.4% |
| Rebounds | 45 | 44 |
| Assists | 18 | 31 |
| Turnovers | 20 | 15 |
| Steals | 8 | 11 |
| Blocks | 11 | 5 |
How the model does with these teams over time: Los Angeles Lakers · Golden State Warriors
Where the forecast differed from the result
| Measure | Forecast | Actual | Actual − forecast |
|---|---|---|---|
| Home margin (GSW) | −2 | +17 | +19 |
| Total points | 230 | 207 | −23 |
| LAL points | 116 | 95 | −21 |
| GSW points | 114 | 112 | −2 |
Recent form before this game
Previous meetings
| Date | Matchup | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 21 2026-27 | GSW at LAL | GSW 105 – 127 LAL |
| Apr 9 2025-26 | LAL at GSW | LAL 119 – 103 GSW |
| Feb 28 2025-26 | LAL at GSW | LAL 129 – 101 GSW |
| Feb 7 2025-26 | GSW at LAL | GSW 99 – 105 LAL |
| Oct 21 2025-26 | GSW at LAL | GSW 119 – 109 LAL |