2023-24 · Regular Season · Final
Milwaukee Bucks at Golden State Warriors
Wednesday, March 6, 2024 · tip-off time not recorded
MIL 2–1@GSW 0–1 records going into the game NBA.com recap ↗
Forecast and result
| Team | Projected | Final | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MIL Milwaukee Bucks | 108 | 90 | −18 |
| GSW Golden State Warriors (home) | 110 | 125 | +15 |
Forecast: Golden State Warriors to win, 59% win probability, projected margin 2.
Inside the Forecast
How the inputs are builtWhat the model received
| Input | MIL | GSW |
|---|---|---|
| Elo ratingMargin-of-victory Elo; 1500 is average. | 1594 | 1583 |
| Elo gap, home minus road, incl. home court | +59 | |
| Season scoring marginPoints per game, blended with last season early in the year. | +4.5 | +1.4 |
| Games played this season | 62 | 60 |
| Offensive rating, last 10Points scored per 100 possessions. | 116.3 | 113.7 |
| Defensive rating, last 10Points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better. | 103.2 | 112.1 |
| Combined pace, last 10Possessions per game, both teams. | 99.7 | |
| Rotation points missingPoints per game of rotation players listed Out or Doubtful. | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Rest days | 2 | 3 |
| Second night of a back-to-back | No | No |
This forecast can't be broken down exactly: the model version that made this forecast is not available. Explanations are shown only when the model that made a forecast can be rebuilt and reproduces it. How explanations are checked
Built from the box scores
How the breakdowns workWhere each input came from. Open a row to see the games and box-score stats behind it. A breakdown is shown only when rebuilding it from the stored stats gives exactly the number the model received.
Elo ratingMIL1594GSW1583
Updated after every game from the final score only: wins, losses and margin. Each season starts by keeping 75% of last season's distance from the 1500 average.
MIL1594
- Ended last season at 1556 → started this one at 1542
- First 52 games: +9.6
- Last 10 games: +42.3
- WCHA120–84+3.9
- WDEN112–95+13.5
- LMIA97–123−30.6
- L@MEM110–113−6.9
- W@MIN112–107+13.0
- W@PHI119–98+17.3
- WCHA123–85+6.2
- W@CHA111–99+5.4
- W@CHI113–97+13.6
- WLAC113–106+6.9
GSW1583
- Ended last season at 1581 → started this one at 1560
- First 50 games: −2.7
- Last 10 games: +25.3
- W@UTA129–107+19.7
- LLAC125–130−7.3
- W@UTA140–137+5.3
- WLAL128–110+9.4
- WCHA97–84+2.4
- LDEN103–119−17.7
- W@WAS123–112+4.3
- W@NYK110–99+13.2
- W@TOR120–105+9.2
- L@BOS88–140−13.2
Season scoring marginMIL+4.5GSW+1.4
Points scored minus points allowed per game this season, mixed with last season's margin until 20 games are played.
MIL+4.5
Scores 121.4, allows 116.9 over 62 games: +4.5 a game.
GSW+1.4
Scores 118.6, allows 117.2 over 60 games: +1.4 a game.
Offensive rating, last 10MIL116.3GSW113.7
Points scored per 100 possessions. Split into the four factors: right of center helps the team, left hurts, in points per 100 possessions compared with the league average (2023-24 to date: 115.0).
MIL116.3scored, +1.4 vs league
| Factor | MIL | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 56.2% | 54.8% | +2.2 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 10.4% | 11.5% | +1.6 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 19.4% | 24.2% | −2.1 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.198 | 0.199 | −0.0 | |
| Everything else | −0.3 |
GSW113.7scored, −1.3 vs league
| Factor | GSW | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 54.1% | 54.8% | −1.1 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 12.2% | 11.5% | −0.9 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 27.4% | 24.2% | +1.4 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.138 | 0.199 | −1.8 | |
| Everything else | +1.0 |
Defensive rating, last 10MIL103.2GSW112.1
Points allowed per 100 possessions, built from what opponents did in those games. Bars point right when the defense held opponents below average. Split into the four factors: right of center helps the team, left hurts, in points per 100 possessions compared with the league average (2023-24 to date: 115.0).
MIL103.2allowed, −11.8 vs league
| Factor | Opponents | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 49.9% | 54.8% | +7.4 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 12.0% | 11.5% | +0.7 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 19.1% | 24.2% | +2.3 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.162 | 0.199 | +1.1 | |
| Everything else | +0.3 |
GSW112.1allowed, −2.8 vs league
| Factor | Opponents | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 53.5% | 54.8% | +2.0 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 11.9% | 11.5% | +0.5 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 24.9% | 24.2% | −0.3 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.178 | 0.199 | +0.6 | |
| Everything else | +0.1 |
Pace, last 10average 99.7
Possessions per 48 minutes. The model uses the average of the two teams. Faster games mean more points for both sides, so pace mostly moves the projected total, not the margin.
MIL 97.4 and GSW 102.0 → average 99.7 (league 2023-24 to date: 99.6)
Rotation points missingMIL0.0GSW0.0
Points per game of rotation players (two or more of the last 10 games this season, 15+ minutes) listed Out or Doubtful on the official injury report.
MIL0.0pts/g missing
Every rotation player was available.
Source: official injury report, 2024-03-06 17:30 ET. 8 rotation players.
GSW0.0pts/g missing
Every rotation player was available.
Source: official injury report, 2024-03-06 17:30 ET. 8 rotation players.
RestMIL2 daysGSW3 days
Days since the team's previous game, capped at 5. One day means the second night of a back-to-back.
MIL2days
Last played Mar 4 against LAC.
GSW3days
Last played Mar 3 against BOS.
The last 10 games behind these numbers, box-score totals
MIL
| Date | Opp | Score | FG | 3P | FT | TOV | OREB | Off | Def | Pace |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4 | LAC | 113–106 | 37-78 | 15-38 | 24-28 | 11 | 2 | 114.1 | 108.2 | 98.5 |
| Mar 1 | @CHI | 113–97 | 37-86 | 15-46 | 24-32 | 7 | 11 | 118.9 | 103.2 | 94.5 |
| Feb 29 | @CHA | 111–99 | 39-86 | 16-39 | 17-20 | 7 | 8 | 118.1 | 105.3 | 94.0 |
| Feb 27 | CHA | 123–85 | 46-89 | 16-40 | 15-18 | 9 | 11 | 130.9 | 88.5 | 95.0 |
| Feb 25 | @PHI | 119–98 | 43-79 | 18-37 | 15-18 | 18 | 7 | 125.3 | 101.0 | 96.0 |
| Feb 23 | @MIN | 112–107 | 41-87 | 13-37 | 17-25 | 10 | 11 | 114.3 | 109.2 | 98.0 |
| Feb 15 | @MEM | 110–113 | 42-90 | 11-44 | 15-20 | 13 | 11 | 108.9 | 113.0 | 100.5 |
| Feb 13 | MIA | 97–123 | 37-83 | 13-39 | 10-11 | 18 | 5 | 96.0 | 121.8 | 101.0 |
| Feb 12 | DEN | 112–95 | 42-84 | 16-34 | 12-18 | 12 | 9 | 115.5 | 96.9 | 97.5 |
| Feb 9 | CHA | 120–84 | 41-94 | 18-52 | 20-24 | 5 | 10 | 121.2 | 84.8 | 99.0 |
GSW
| Date | Opp | Score | FG | 3P | FT | TOV | OREB | Off | Def | Pace |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3 | @BOS | 88–140 | 36-92 | 7-41 | 9-13 | 17 | 11 | 86.3 | 137.3 | 102.0 |
| Mar 1 | @TOR | 120–105 | 44-98 | 18-44 | 14-18 | 14 | 15 | 114.3 | 101.0 | 104.5 |
| Feb 29 | @NYK | 110–99 | 44-98 | 14-44 | 8-16 | 11 | 16 | 111.1 | 101.0 | 98.5 |
| Feb 27 | @WAS | 123–112 | 47-94 | 21-46 | 8-11 | 18 | 9 | 116.0 | 107.7 | 105.0 |
| Feb 25 | DEN | 103–119 | 35-81 | 11-34 | 22-29 | 17 | 11 | 104.0 | 121.4 | 98.5 |
| Feb 23 | CHA | 97–84 | 38-89 | 13-42 | 8-10 | 21 | 13 | 98.0 | 84.0 | 99.5 |
| Feb 22 | LAL | 128–110 | 50-107 | 16-41 | 12-14 | 9 | 15 | 128.0 | 108.9 | 100.5 |
| Feb 15 | @UTA | 140–137 | 49-92 | 20-42 | 22-28 | 13 | 13 | 135.9 | 131.7 | 103.5 |
| Feb 14 | LAC | 125–130 | 47-103 | 18-47 | 13-18 | 9 | 13 | 120.2 | 126.2 | 103.5 |
| Feb 12 | @UTA | 129–107 | 48-100 | 20-44 | 13-17 | 13 | 12 | 122.9 | 101.9 | 105.0 |
Off and Def are points scored and allowed per 100 possessions in each game; their averages are the 10-game ratings above. OREB is missing (–) where the source data didn't record it.
The result against the forecast
2023-24 surprise gamesSurprise is measured against this model's forecast, not against what other observers expected. Outcome surprise is −ln(winner's pregame probability): 0.69 for a coin flip, 2.3 for a 10% winner.
Team box score
What happened in the game. These numbers are not used by the forecast, and they are not offered as the reason it missed.
| Team stat | MIL | GSW |
|---|---|---|
| Final score | 90 | 125 |
| Field goals | 34–89 · 38.2% | 51–91 · 56.0% |
| Three-pointers | 11–39 · 28.2% | 19–39 · 48.7% |
| Free throws | 11–15 · 73.3% | 4–7 · 57.1% |
| Rebounds | 36 | 50 |
| Assists | 19 | 37 |
| Turnovers | 15 | 14 |
| Steals | 8 | 10 |
| Blocks | 5 | 13 |
How the model does with these teams over time: Milwaukee Bucks · Golden State Warriors
Where the forecast differed from the result
| Measure | Forecast | Actual | Actual − forecast |
|---|---|---|---|
| Home margin (GSW) | +2 | +35 | +33 |
| Total points | 218 | 215 | −3 |
| MIL points | 108 | 90 | −18 |
| GSW points | 110 | 125 | +15 |
Score by quarter
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | OT | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIL | 32 | 26 | 23 | 9 | – | 90 |
| GSW | 40 | 38 | 15 | 32 | – | 125 |
Recent form before this game
Previous meetings
| Date | Matchup | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 13 2023-24 | GSW at MIL | GSW 118 – 129 MIL |
| Mar 11 2022-23 | MIL at GSW | MIL 116 – 125 GSW |
| Dec 13 2022-23 | GSW at MIL | GSW 111 – 128 MIL |
| Mar 12 2021-22 | MIL at GSW | MIL 109 – 122 GSW |
| Jan 13 2021-22 | GSW at MIL | GSW 99 – 118 MIL |